صرفا اومدم سه تا خبر رو بدم فرصت خاصی تو بازار نمیبینم و پروژه هایی که فعال بودیم هم خبری نیست ازشون 1. InfiniFI توکنش داره لانچ میشه و تا فردا بعد از ظهر بیشتر برای ثبت والت فرصت ندارید https://x.com/infiniFi/status/2117640930752704958 فکر نمیکنم چیز خاصی بشه ولی خب ... 2. Extended توکنش داره لانچ میشه و نرخ تبدیل امتیاز به توکنش مشخص شده هر امتیاز حدود 4.3 XTEN میشه درحال حاضر تو پری مارکت ها حدود 2.5 دلار ارزش…

Channel
Cryptology
@cryptology_0x
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,639subscribers
-236 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001440746256 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptology_0x |
| Description | DM @mahdi_zocker X (Twitter) x.com/mahdizocker En @the_cryptology_com |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptology_0x |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 15:06 | 8,639 | -16 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 01:51 | 8,655 | -2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 22:11 | 8,657 | -7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:49 | 8,664 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 19:21 | 8,673 | -5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:08 | 8,678 | -5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:09 | 8,683 | -6 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 10:01 | 8,689 | -6 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 14:30 | 8,695 | -11 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 14:39 | 8,706 | -20 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 09:17 | 8,726 | -11 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 14:16 | 8,737 | -36 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:02 | 8,773 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 8,778 | -11 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 8,789 | -9 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 8,798 | -16 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 8,814 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 8,822 | -12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 8,834 | -9 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 8,843 | first reading |
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 20.8%
- avg views ÷ 8,639 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,800
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 33 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (4 June 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,800 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 13:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,580
- Videos
- ≈12
- Links
- ≈1,980
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
یه روشی که هزینه تون رو کاهش میده اینه که سعی کنید حجم معامله زیاد باشه ولی تند تند پوزیشن باز نکنید و بیشتر بزارید باز بمونه مثلا میتونید کلا دو سه تا پوزیشن هفتگی باز کنید و حداقل چند روز بزارید بمونه یا اقتصادی تر پوزیشن ها رو یک هفته باز نگه دارید اینطوری هزینه فارمتون خیلی کمتر میشه
توکنومیک و جزئیات لانچ Variational مشخص شد • قرار بود آخر Q3 توکن رو لانچ کنن که تعداد کل امتیاز ها میشد حدود 9.15 میلیون امتیاز • زمان لانچ توکن رو عقب انداختن و گفتن Q4 میشه • اینطوری اگر هفته آخر سال رو فرض کنیم و تا آخر همین 150 هزار امتیاز هفتگی توزیع بشه، نهایتا میشه حدود 11.1 میلیون امتیاز • اعلام کردن 32% از توکن رو برای ایردراپ اولیه اختصاص میدن (مشابه Hyperliquid عمل کردن شده) • 18% برای اکوسیستم و 50% برا…
Concrete • دور جدید جذب سرمایه (استراتژیک) داشته • توکن خودش رو رسما معرفی کرده و گفته آماده لانچ توکن هستش • بنیاد Concrete رو ایجاد کرده (برای لانچ توکن لازمه) • دو هفته قبل هم خبرش اومد که Coinbase قراره لیستش کنه • هنوز چیزی درمورد فروش توکن، پاداش یا ... صحبت نکرده و گفته منتظر اخبار بعدی باشید 🔗 خبر جذب سرمایه 🔗 خبر معرفی توکن و Foundation
InfiniFI ۳ میلیون دلار سرمایه جذب کردن با رهبری Electric Capital (مجموع جذب سرمایه شون به 6 میلیون دلار میرسه) گفتن قدم بعدی لانچ توکنه که تو همین سه ماه چهارم 2026 انجام میشه https://x.com/infinifi/status/2102761878216749511
شرایط فروش توکن Jumper هم اومد و مشخص شده مشخصات فروش JUMP • ارزش گذاری (FDV) فروش 75 میلیون دلار • تعداد کل توکن ها 1 میلیارد • قیمت هر توکن برای فروش حدود 0.075$ • حدود 4% از کل توکن ها برای فروش در نظر گرفته شده • سقف جذب سرمایه (فروش توکن) 3 میلیون دلار و Soft Cap برابر 2 میلیون دلار • فروش از 29 سپتامبر تا 2 اکتبر روی پلتفرم Legion انجام میشه • زمان TGE رو گفتن Q4 ولی تاریخ دقیق مشخص نیست • تضمینی نیست که …
توکنومیکس • حدود 33% برای کامیونیتی (Community) در نظر گرفته شده / هنوز معلوم نیست چه مقدار مستقیما برای Airdrop یا XP باشه • حدود 26% برای سرمایه گذار ها (Investors) • حدود 22% برای خزانه (Treasury) • حدود 15% برای تیم (Team) • حدود 4 برای فروش عمومی (Public Sale) اولویت خریداران • کسایی که XP و Level بالاتری دارن، تو سهمیه (Allocation) فروش اولویت بیشتری خواهند داشت • 500 نفر برتر Waitlist Leaderboard هم اولویت ب…
فروش توکنش تو Legion قطعیه (ظاهرا با FDV 75 میلیون دلار که اگر باشه عدد منطقی هستش) اینکه آیا پاداش جدایی برای کسایی که XP و NFT شو داشتن میده یا نه مشخص نیست هنوز تا الان در مجموع حدود 52 میلیون دلار جذب سرمایه هم داشته
Jumper/LIFI https://x.com/MahdiZocker/status/2102412795866492982?s=20
KYCnot.me اینم سایت کاربردیه یک دایرکتوری برای پیدا کردن و مقایسه سرویس های کریپتویی No-KYC و Privacy-focused هستش سرویس هایی مثل صرافی ها، P2P ها، Swap ها و ابزار های مرتبط رو از نظر نیاز به احراز هویت، حریم خصوصی، اعتماد و امنیت بررسی و امتیازدهی میکنه
الان مثلا Bulk اگر فعالیت کنید early هستید مزیت هاشو هم قبلا تو پستش گفتم (30% رو گفتن برای ایردراپ اولیه اختصاص دادن، پشتش فاندر سولانا هستش و ...) حالا اینو نخواستید بقیه صرافی هایی که دوستان معرفی میکنن هم خوبن بعضیاشون تا یه حجم مشخصی معامله کنید بخاطر مشوقی که دارن فی شو بهتون بر میگردونن برای Bulk اگر خواستید فعالیت کنید و نیاز به کد دعوت داشتید PV پیام بدید
چند روز پیش هم یه پروژه ای به نام TreadFI (که باهاش میتونید روی PerpDEX هایی که پشتیبانی میکنه بات ست کنید تا معامله کنه) توکن لانچ کرد که ایرداپش بد نشد با اینکه کلا 50 میلیون دلار FDV خورده ولی کسی early میبود پاداشش خوب میشد (اینکه زیاد هم فارم نشده بود بی تاثیر نیست) منظور اینکه پروژه های PerpDEX همیشه پتانسیل پاداش خوب دادن رو دارن اگر توشون early باشید یا حداقل با برنامه (حساب و کتاب) پیش برید
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @cryptology_0x. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cryptobyalireza · 36,647
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 September 2026
@icoandidoupdate · 606,536
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@gheermeez · 26,770
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 September 2026
@goshayeshe786 · 27,877
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 19 September 2026
@TetherLand · 71,029
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 August 2026
@commanderBTC · 24,350
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
@Bitpin_Academy · 36,539
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
@ccoineres · 20,809
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 September 2026
@bistoyekrypto · 40,057
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
@mahaneconomy · 293,710
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
@xanastrology · 46,620
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
@ramzali_sc · 149,934
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
@heshmati_finance · 25,950
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
@crypto0commander · 31,061
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
@SonicAnnouncements · 20,319
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026
@Holders_News · 57
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 September 2026
@moji_anti_left · 43,071
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
@GemsVIPOfficial · 20,792
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 September 2026
@iamusd · 26,774
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cryptology” (@cryptology_0x), 8,639 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptology_0x.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.