Channel
@we_are_gangs
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
7,636subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001703604253 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @we_are_gangs |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/we_are_gangs |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 7,636 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 7,633 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 7,636 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:00 | 7,635 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:59 | 7,635 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (22 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 72,560 |
| Reactions total | 697 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
697 reactions across 24 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 229 | 32.9% | |
| 👍 | 215 | 30.8% | |
| 💔 | 164 | 23.5% | |
| 🕊 | 74 | 10.6% | |
| 🙏 | 15 | 2.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 697reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @we_are_gangs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
بعد از توییت base برای builder program ای که در نظر گرفته یکی از یوزر ها پرسیده که: - چرا فقط بیلدرها و چرا برای کامیونیتی برنامه ای در نظر گرفته نمیشه؟ + تیم base پاسخ داده که بزودی Creator program هم داریم خبر خوبیه برای بچه هایی که تولید محتوا میکنن و توییت میزنن 💙 خلاصه که برید سراغش و انجامش بدید شاید که خوشحال کننده بود براتون!
❤20👍9💔4
📣 انتقال Secret Labs به Arbitrum از تاریخ ۱ سپتامبر توکن های SCRT به شبکه Arb منتقل میشه بصورت Erc20 ، هم زمان یک اسنپ شات هم گرفته میشه از دارایی کسایی که Scrt Native هولد میکنند یا استیک کردن ، اگر که استیک کردید هم نگران نباشید از طریق سیستم اسنپ شات Redeemer میتونین کوین جدید رو روی شبکه Arbitrum claim کنین ، نیاز آن استیک کردن نیست. 🔔 کاری که باید انجام بدید اینه ، کسایی که داخل استخر ها پوزیشن دارید باید سریع…
❤14
#MultiPli https://x.com/i/status/2085767485995819404 - اینا هم توکن میخوان بدن ، این برنامه پیشفروشه ، چک کنید توصیه ای نیست که شرکت کنید یا نه . برا ایر هم چیزی نگفتن فعلا ، احتمالا بعد پیشفروش جزئیات میاد .
👍8❤2
این NFT رو با 33 تا سکه جمع کردن وایت لیست بشین(طول میکشه فک نکن راحته :) https://galleria.theflorentines.xyz/ وقتی کل ۳۳ تا سکه رو جمع کردین یه پاپ آپ میاد بالا و ازتون آدرس ولت میگیره آدرس فلگ شده ندین چون مینت بروی opensea هست برای پیدا کردین راحت تر سکه ها با کلیک چپ دیوارهارو نشونه دار کنین که تو یک فضا چندبار نگردین دنبال سکه مینت :13 آگوست 2618 Supply Ethereum https://opensea.io/collection/the-galler…
👍17
https://wallet.cyber.co/assets - اینا هم خیلی وقت پیش جمع کردن ولتو ولی هنوز ۶ روز وقت داره برا برداشت اگه یادتون رفته چک کنید ، موجودی اسمارت گس هم گفتن نمیدیم ! https://cyber.co/bridge - رو شبکه هم اگه چیزی دارید بردارید اونم خاموش میشه احتمالا چند وقت دیگه 😏
❤12💔1
#Base https://x.com/JRojeres/status/2085686780599124330 - با لینک داخل توییت یه کارت بسازید و شیر کنید رو X ، هزینه ای نداره فقط یوزرنیم X وارد میکنید و MakeMyImage بزنید . دوست داشتین حمایت کنید با کمی دیلی بک میدم 🤝
👍31
#Jumper https://jumper.xyz/missions/jumper-advanced-launch - اگه فعالید انجام بدین .
❤15💔2
https://farcaster.xyz/jjolly/0x69ca4453 - میتونید یوزر نیم برا ولت کلودفلر بگیرید ، هزینه و اتصال ولت نمیخواد ، لینک داخل کست بالا هست با گوگل لاگین کنید ، دوست داشتین ❤️
👍24🕊2
https://x.com/i/status/2084613346729353332 - همین شد ، دارایی رو انتقال بدید .
💔15
پواپ هم بعد ۵ سال و کلی خاطره کرکره شو داد پایین. https://x.com/i/status/2084273977938080092
💔80👍5❤2
#Galxe https://x.com/GravityChain/status/2079748700461822011 - اینا هم یه سری تغییرات دادن اگه توکن رو شبکشون دارید استیک/هولد چک کنید ، همه لینک ها داخل مقاله هست تا ۱ نوامبر فرصت داره .
❤19🙏1
- این رفل جوین بدین : https://debank.com/stream/3548459?t=1693966352783&r=91619
❤13💔5
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @we_are_gangs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@we_are_gangs edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
یه گروه تروتمیز بزنیم برای فالو و بالا بردن اکانت X؟ نظرتون چیه؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 140,862 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GANGs” (@we_are_gangs), 7,636 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/we_are_gangs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.