Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Football & FPL ⚽️ Fantasy Premier League

@FPLFootball

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,700subscribers

+104 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001466136657
TypeChannel
Username@FPLFootball
DescriptionYour source for Premier League goals, news, stats & FPL ⚽️ Fantasy Premier League updates. 💬 Group chat: @FootballFPL
Created27 September 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FPLFootball

Growth

17,59517,70017,647.56 August 2026 — 17,596 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,595 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,596 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,612 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,630 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,642 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,680 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,700 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +104. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,579–17,716 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:3717,700+20
11 Aug 2026, 19:1117,680+38
10 Aug 2026, 17:0117,642+12
9 Aug 2026, 18:4217,630+18
8 Aug 2026, 16:0717,612+16
7 Aug 2026, 12:3617,596+1
6 Aug 2026, 09:1117,595-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:4717,596first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.8%
avg views ÷ 17,700 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,140
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.782%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 34 of 35 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held35 (31 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total110,026
Reactions total834
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
19,800
Videos
9,210
Links
3,800

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 19s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

774 reactions across 32 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍17222.2%
14919.3%
🤣13817.8%
🔥11414.7%
🤯293.75%
😁283.62%
😢263.36%
🤡253.23%
🤔162.07%
🤬151.94%
💔101.29%
😘70.904%
😱70.904%
💅60.775%
😎60.775%
🤮60.775%
30.388%
😨30.388%
🤪30.388%
🖕20.258%
7 further kinds91.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 834reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC759 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🇫🇷🏆 Paris Saint-Germain wins the Super Cup.

43🤮2😭2💩1🖕1

Signed Nathan

12 Aug 2026, 20:58 UTC797 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Paris Saint-Germain [2] - 1 Aston Villa - Désiré Doué 62'

🤔3

Signed Nathan

12 Aug 2026, 19:59 UTC≈1,060 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

PSG 1-[1] Aston Villa - Brian Madjo 45'

11🖕1

Signed Nathan

12 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC≈1,440 views19 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Paris Saint-Germain [1] - 0 Aston Villa - Khvicha Kvaratskhelia 21'

16😢2👎1

Signed Nathan

12 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC≈1,450 views18 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🇳🇱 Xavi Hernández is the new head coach of the Netherlands national football team.

🔥16😐2

Signed Nathan

12 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC≈1,580 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

PSG vs. Aston Villa 🏆 UEFA Super Cup Final

👍42

Signed Nathan

12 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC≈2,060 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Posted without readable text

😁4💅1

Signed Nathan

12 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC≈2,420 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚽️ Chelsea have signed left-back Pep Chavarría from Rayo Vallecano for ~£16m.

👍14

Signed Nathan

11 Aug 2026, 21:59 UTC≈2,590 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚽️ Gustavo Hamer has returned to Coventry City from Sheffield United. 🇧🇷 The Brazilian attacking midfielder netted 19 goals in 123 appearances with Coventry. In Sheffield United's Premier League relegation season, Hamer accumulated 4 goals and 7 assists in 36 appearances.

👍5💅1

Signed Nathan

11 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC≈2,770 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚽️ Fulham sign Shea Charles from Southampton in a deal worth up to £30m. The 22-year-old midfielder becomes the most expensive Northern Ireland footballer of all time after signing a five-year contract at Craven Cottage.

👍62

Signed Nathan

11 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC≈2,800 views19 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚽️💎 Nottingham Forest complete the signing of highly-rated centre-back Ousmane Diomande for £34m. 🇨🇮 The Côte d'Ivoire 22-year-old has made more than 150 senior appearances for club, and 15 for the national team.

👍11😱71

Signed Nathan

10 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC≈3,080 views31 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

💰⚽️ Amazon founder Jeff Bezos nears deal to buy ~30% stake in Liverpool Football Club. 🇺🇸 Fenway Sports Group (FSG) will retain the controlling share. ⚽️ The consortium, led by Amit Bhatia, includes Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin, who was part of a failed takeover bid of Chelsea FC in 2022 following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

🤬14🔥10😨32👍1😡1

Signed Nathan

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @FPLFootball. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 201,758 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Bein Fantasy - بي ان فانتاسي
@bein_fantasy · 146,330
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 August 2026
Premier League News
@Premier_League_News_TG · 240,966
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
Sky Sports Football
@Sky_sports_football_updates · 258,577
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Football & FPL ⚽️ Fantasy Premier League” (@FPLFootball), 17,700 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FPLFootball.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.