Channel
@Cinemaee_ir
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,129subscribers
-42 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001103775950 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Cinemaee_ir |
| Description | نگاهی متفاوت به سینما و ادبیات [This Channel is not intended to violate any condition of use. Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism,comment,news reporting,teaching] |
| Created | 10 June 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Cinemaee_ir |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 23,129 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 23,134 | -13 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 23,147 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 23,149 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:53 | 23,148 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 23,153 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 23,159 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 23,165 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 23,167 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 23,171 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:21 | 23,171 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 10 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (10 February 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,560 |
| Reactions total | 141 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
919 reactions across 22 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 728 | 79.2% | |
| 👍 | 164 | 17.8% | |
| 👎 | 27 | 2.94% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 919reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
مشکل من با جمع، این نیست که چطور با بقیه ارتباط برقرار کنم؛ مشکل اینه که چطور باید «باشم». بعضیها خیلی راحت با جمع جور میشن و شکوفا میشن. اما من احساس میکنم همه اطرافم زندهاند، جز من. انگار وجود ندارم. شفافم؛ نامرئیام. من دیگران رو میبینم، اما آنها من رو نمیبینن… A Summer’s Tale (1996) @Cinemaee_IR | #دیالوگ
👍32❤18👎1
• A Summer’s Tale (1996) IMDb: 7.6 اریک رومر با سادهترین گفتوگوها، فیلمی میسازد دربارهی تردید، میل، انتظار و پیچیدگیِ روابط انسانی. اینجا خبری از درامهای پرهیجان نیست؛ جذابیت فیلم در مکالمههایی است که شخصیتها را لایهلایه آشکار میکنند. اگر به فیلمهایی علاقه دارید که بیشتر از آنکه جواب بدهند، سؤال ایجاد میکنند، این فیلم را از دست ندهید. این فیلم کمتر دربارهی روابط عاشقانه است و بیشتر دربارهی خودِ انسان ا…
❤23👍1
خوشبختی یعنی زندگی کردن در جریان عادی روزها، بیآنکه مدام از خودت بپرسی چقدر خوشبختی. عمیقترین شکل خوشبختی، همان لحظهای است که دیگر آگاه نیستی که خوشبخت هستی. 📚مغز اندرو ✍🏻 ای. ال. دکتروف @Cinemaee_IR | #کتاب
👍35❤15
• مغز اندرو نویسنده: ای. ال. دکتروف «مغز اندرو» فقط روایت زندگی یک عصبشناس نیست؛ سفری است به ذهن انسانی که میان خاطره، احساس گناه، عشق و حقیقت سرگردان است. ای. ال. دکتروف در آخرین رمانش، مرز میان ذهن و مغز، واقعیت و توهم، و اختیار و تقدیر را به چالش میکشد. روایت تکهتکه و اعترافگونهی کتاب، خواننده را وادار میکند مدام از خودش بپرسد: آیا حافظه حقیقت را روایت میکند، یا آن را از نو میسازد؟ اگر به رمانهای روانش…
❤13👍3
• The Brown Bunny (2003) IMDb: 4.9 داستان درباره «باد کلی»، موتورسوار مسابقهای است که پس از پایان یک رقابت، سفری طولانی را از شرق تا غرب آمریکا آغاز میکند. اما این جاده، بیش از آنکه مسیری روی نقشه باشد، سفری در خاطرات، حسرتها و زخمهای مردی است که هنوز از گذشتهاش رها نشده است. هر توقف، هر ملاقات و هر کیلومتر از این مسیر، لایهای دیگر از تنهایی و اندوه او را آشکار میکند. فیلم با ریتمی کند، دیالوگهای اندک و نما…
❤26👎2
• مرشد و مارگاریتا نویسنده: میخاییل بولگاکوف داستان در مسکوِ دوران شوروی آغاز میشود؛ جایی که ورود مردی مرموز به همراه گروهی عجیب، نظم شهر را بههم میریزد. اما پشت این روایتِ ظاهراً طنزآمیز و فانتزی، رمانی عمیق دربارهی عشق، آزادی، حقیقت، قدرت و مرز میان خیر و شر پنهان شده است. بولگاکف با ترکیب طنز سیاه، فلسفه و عناصر سوررئال، اثری خلق کرده که همزمان میتواند شما را بخنداند، متعجب کند و وادار به فکر کردن کند. مر…
❤43
اگر بخوای همهچیز رو بفهمی، نمیتونی زندگی کنی. بعضیچیزها فقط باید تحمل بشن، نه فهمیده… Drive my car (2021) @Cinemaee_IR | #دیالوگ
❤47👍5👎2
فیلمهایی آرام، اما ویرانکننده… Drive My Car روایتی آرام از سوگواری، پشیمانی و حرفهایی که هیچوقت گفته نشدند. فیلمی که بهجای شوک، با سکوت و گفتوگو قلب مخاطب را میشکند. A Ghost Story تأملی شاعرانه درباره زمان، فقدان و گذرا بودن انسان. فیلمی که با کمترین دیالوگ، عمیقترین احساسات را منتقل میکند. Still Walking یک دورهمی خانوادگی ساده که زیر لایههای سکوت، سالها حسرت، رنج و سوءتفاهم را پنهان کرده ا…
❤34
«ما زندگی را، همانطور که رخ میدهد و بدون هشدار، زندگی میکنیم؛ مثل هنرپیشهای که برای اولینبار نقش خود را تمرین میکند. و اگر نخستین تمرین برای زندگی، خودِ زندگی باشد، دیگر چه میتوان انتظار داشت؟ در چنین وضعی، هیچ راهی برای سنجیدن درستی یا نادرستی انتخابها وجود ندارد؛ چون تنها یک بار زندگی میکنیم و هیچ فرصتی برای آزمون دوباره نداریم.» 📚 بار هستی ✍🏻 میلان کوندرا @Cinemaee_IR | #کتاب
❤33👍7
زندگی ترکیبی از جادو و پاستاست… فدریکو فلینی @Cinemaee_IR | #نقل_قول
❤29👍9
سکان کشتی زندگی را آنطور که بلدی به دست میگیری؛ گاهی دریا آرام است، گاهی هم کشتی به صخره میخورد... The Sopranos (1999-2007) @Cinemaee_IR | #دیالوگ
❤32👍11
قدرت، پول، خیانت؛ ۷ سریال مافیایی که هر عاشق این ژانر باید ببیند. 1. The Sopranos 🇺🇸 داستان تونی سوپرانو؛ رئیس مافیایی که میان ادارهی امپراتوری جنایت، خانواده و مشکلات روانی گرفتار شده است. یکی از تأثیرگذارترین سریالهای تاریخ. 2. Narcos 🇨🇴 روایتی نفسگیر از ظهور و سقوط پابلو اسکوبار و جنگ بیامان کارتلهای مواد مخدر با دولت و DEA. 3. Gomorrah 🇮🇹 تصویری تلخ، خشن و واقعگرایانه از مافیای کامورا در ناپل؛ جایی که قد…
❤24👍6👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @Cinemaee_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 409,158 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CINEMAee | سینمایی” (@Cinemaee_ir), 23,129 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cinemaee_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.