3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 204–205 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 01:07
204
-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:17
205
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:21
205
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
57.1%
avg views ÷ 204 subscribers
Avg views / post
117
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held
20 (1 January 2025 – 26 July 2026)
Views total
466
Reactions total
10
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
150 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
70
46.7%
❤
24
16.0%
🔥
13
8.67%
⚡
12
8.00%
🤡
11
7.33%
💯
6
4.00%
🤔
6
4.00%
👎
3
2.00%
😁
2
1.33%
👏
1
0.667%
💊
1
0.667%
🕊
1
0.667%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 January 2025 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пара клоунов, оставивших здесь свои аватары, навели на идею провести опрос:
Что такое " политическое животное"?
Скотина0%
Скотина, ещё и политикой занимается14%
Политический активист0%
Продажный политик14%
Коррупционер0%
Человек50%
Альфа-самец в стае гамадрил36%
"Бродяга, смертный прыщ!"14%
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Почему нельзя придираться к Нолану за неисторичные наряды и локации?
Потому что фильм не про древних греков, а про нас...
Обрисую общую картину для понимания.
Эгейский мир, основа Западной и не только цивилизации, был гораздо древнее греков времён Гомера. "Илиада" и "Одиссея" это квинтэссенция и осмысление до-греческого мира, о котором сами греки уже не помнили. Фактически, это Библия античного мира, сборник преда…
⬆️
Сюжет эпоса, кто не знает, можете погуглить. А вот что привнес своё Нолан, чего не было у Гомера:
1. Мир забыл "закон Зевса"
2. Нашествие "народов моря" - неведомых варваров, разрушивших цивилизацию.
Давайте по пунктам. Закон Зевса это отношение к человеку как к личности, а не объекту приложения усилий, с которого можно поиметь материальную выгоду. В фильме все персонажи сплошь и рядом нарушают его - начиная от …
ОДИССЕЯ
Ненадолго вынырну из пучин забвения.
И только чтобы поделиться впечатлениями от самого антиповесточного фильма, который я когда либо видел.
Ещё на этапе трейлеров я проклял и заклеймил "Одиссею" Нолана за негров и небинаров в кадре. Притчей во языцех задолго до выхода фильма стали доспехи "а-ля" звёздные войны и корабли греков "а-ля" драккары викингов.
Первые кадры с негром - рапсодом легли в матрицу ожид…
Сегодняшний пост ув. коллег навёл на мысли по антропологии власти/влияния в Российской империи середины 19 века.
Рабочими лошадками двух главных реформ Александра II были братья Милютины - Дмитрий и Николай Алексеевичи. Выходцы из неродовитого разорившегося дворянского рода стали выдающимися реформаторами военного и крестьянского вопросов.
Кто или что их привело к большим должностям? Личные качества - исполнительно…
Ув. коллеги дали анализ "Левши" Лескова с позиции разведывательной работы.
Левша произведение многослойное, позволяющее различные толкования. Историй здесь несколько: это и трагическая судьба Левши, и пострадавшее государево дело, и бесчеловечные тиски бюрократии, и... много чего можно вычитать. На линию блохи мало кто обращает внимание. А она здесь ключевая. И делает "Левшу" лучшей философской притчей в русской ли…
В нашей гуманитарной коммуналке обычно тихо и академично. Порывы ветра и сквозняки бывают из за открытых форточек разве что(метафора новых книг и новых идей).
Я выглянул из дверей своей комнаты теории и истории культуры, услышав шум, который уже некоторое время доносится из соседней комнаты антропологов здесь и здесь. Нешуточный всплеск эмоций в связи с выходом на русском языке книги Девида Гребера и Девида Уингроу…
QUO VADIS?*
Думаю, пониманию того, что происходит за океаном поможет вот какое сравнение. В аналитике оно встречается.
Европа, вступив в эпоху модерна, в 17 веке, выносит на аутсорс несколько проектов. Точнее, активные акторы на периферии европейской мир-системы берут из волшебного котелка идей Просвещения то, что им кажется истинным.
В 1620 г. фанатики-пуритане основывают сияющий "Град на холме" на пустынном конт…
Уважаемая Диля задаёт вопрос по "секте писаного права", как я её называю.
Якобы мир управляется двумя системами права - континентальной и морской. Первая это симулякр для прикрытия делишек со второй. Последней реальной системой континентального права был СССР. После его краха пронырливые торгаши(?) навязали всему миру морское право, и выжимают все соки из не подозревающих ничего народов: Конституция не работает, все…
В этот день 164 года назад Государь Освободитель Александр Второй даровал личную волю крепостным.
Всех причастных с годовщиной!🎉🎉🎉
На минуточку, в начале 19 века доля крепостных составляла до 50% от всего населения Российской империи. Так что причастных среди нас найдется достаточно.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wishyouwasthere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Пара клоунов, оставивших здесь свои аватары, навели на идею провести опрос:
Что такое " политическое животное"?
Скотина0%
Скотина, ещё и политикой занимается14%
Политический активист0%
Продажный политик14%
Коррупционер0%
Человек50%
Альфа-самец в стае гамадрил36%
"Бродяга, смертный прыщ!"14%
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 January 2025 to 26 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Я тут рядом стоял” (@wishyouwasthere), 204 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wishyouwasthere.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
