So this is kind of a quiet big deal — The Clearing House, the outfit that handles settlement for a bunch of US banks, picked Quant to help build out tokenized deposit infrastructure 🏦 Rollout is planned for 2027, so it's not happening tomorrow, but it does mean Quant's tech could end up running behind the scenes of actual bank operations. It's one of those slow, boring-sounding infra deals that might matter more long…

Channel
Allinvex Crypto Exchange
@Allinvexc
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
133,148subscribers
-24,309 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002093453026 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @Allinvexc @NftAi_Ai |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 54 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Allinvexc |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:35 | 133,148 | -168 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 22:38 | 133,316 | -171 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 00:20 | 133,487 | +133,483 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 14:56 | 4 | -133,756 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:59 | 133,760 | -223 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:57 | 133,983 | -190 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 22:56 | 134,173 | -296 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 134,469 | -169 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:54 | 134,638 | -240 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 21:55 | 134,878 | -198 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:27 | 135,076 | -154 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 20:11 | 135,230 | -226 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:36 | 135,456 | -264 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 135,720 | -214 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 19:17 | 135,934 | -270 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 17:31 | 136,204 | -280 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 136,484 | -179 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:09 | 136,663 | -233 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 18:46 | 136,896 | -186 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 19:27 | 137,082 | first reading |
Engagement
971 posts held, back to 5 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 161 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.09%
- avg views ÷ 133,148 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 120
- 208 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.657%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 208
- of 971 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 208 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 971 (5 April 2025 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 25,063 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 00:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈955
- Links
- ≈1,050
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
4,231 reactions across 81 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,188 | 28.1% | |
| ❤ | 1,008 | 23.8% | |
| 🎉 | 530 | 12.5% | |
| 🔥 | 450 | 10.6% | |
| 🤝 | 341 | 8.06% | |
| 👌 | 255 | 6.03% | |
| 👏 | 164 | 3.88% | |
| 🐳 | 97 | 2.29% | |
| 🤩 | 78 | 1.84% | |
| 🗿 | 77 | 1.82% | |
| 😈 | 4 | 0.095% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 0.095% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.071% | |
| 👾 | 3 | 0.071% | |
| 😎 | 3 | 0.071% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 0.071% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 0.071% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.047% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 0.047% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 0.047% | |
| 8 further kinds | 14 | 0.331% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 90 of the 971 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,231 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 971 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2025 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Big one out of the US today 👀 The CFTC just approved perpetual futures on individual US stocks — the no-expiry contracts crypto traders already use constantly. Even the regulator said people won't need offshore platforms for this anymore. Feels like a crypto-native tool just got a official stamp in traditional markets. Do you think more exchanges start offering these soon? #CFTC #Perpetuals #CryptoRegulation #TradFi…
Big regulatory news out of the US today 📣 The top derivatives regulator just approved perpetual futures on individual stocks — first time that's ever happened. Perps have mostly been a crypto thing until now, so this is them crossing over into traditional equities. Feels like another sign that crypto-style market structure keeps creeping into TradFi. What do you think — natural evolution, or a bit of a culture clash?…
So there's a massive $6.3B hack tied to a major exchange, and North Korea is firmly denying any involvement 🧐 Kim Yo Jong called the findings "absurd" and hinted the US might be behind it instead — no evidence given though. Meanwhile the exchange says it's covering the full losses itself, so users won't be left footing the bill. Wild story either way — who do you think is actually behind something like this? 🤔 #Cryp…
Quick heads up for anyone in Hong Kong 👀 Crypto.com is shutting down its everyday consumer app there, effective Feb 1, 2027. To be clear — it's just that one app, not their whole business. Users will get official instructions to close accounts and pull their funds before the date hits. If that's you, sounds like a good time to start planning where things go next. Anyone here based in HK — are you already seeing the n…
📊 Daily Market Recap — Nov 3, 2026 (UTC) ₿ BTC $77,082 (-0.56%) Ξ ETH $2,267 (-0.30%) 🔥 Top mover: TRX +1.19% Trade 550+ markets on allinvex.com — follow @Allinvexc for daily updates. #crypto #bitcoin #ethereum #market #allinvex
Hey folks 👋 Quick one for you — BlackRock just offloaded about $405M worth of Bitcoin in a single day. That's their biggest one-day BTC outflow in over four months 👀 Doesn't tell us where things go next, just a notable data point on the radar. Curious what you think — rebalancing, or something worth watching? #Bitcoin #BTC #BlackRock #CryptoNews #Markets 🔗 allinvex.com
So here's a wild one 👀 North Korea is pushing back hard on claims tying it to that roughly $6.3B crypto theft — one of the biggest heists ever reported in this space. They're calling the whole accusation a straight-up fabrication. No hard proof either way yet, just a loud public denial making the rounds. Stuff like this is a good reminder of why solid security and self-custody habits matter so much 🔐 What do you thin…
Rough few hours across the markets today 😬 Stocks, metals, and crypto all dipped around the same time as tensions flared between Iran and the US over bases in Europe. This is just classic risk-off behavior — when geopolitics gets tense, money gets jumpy everywhere at once, not just in crypto. Markets hate uncertainty more than almost anything else. How's everyone holding up through today's chaos? 👀 #MarketNews #Cryp…
Heads up on something happening in Brazil 🇧🇷 The country's biggest crypto exchange just paused all deposits and withdrawals. They're saying it's while they look into a 'security incident' — not many details yet. No word yet on how long this'll take or what actually happened. Stuff like this is always a good reminder to pay attention to where your funds sit 👀 Anyone catching more updates on this one? #crypto #CryptoN…
📊 Daily Market Recap — Nov 2, 2026 (UTC) ₿ BTC $78,020 (+0.05%) Ξ ETH $2,294 (+1.19%) 🔥 Top mover: AVAX -1.77% Trade 550+ markets on allinvex.com — follow @Allinvexc for daily updates. #crypto #bitcoin #ethereum #market #allinvex
Saw a wild stat today 👀 North Korea has reportedly pulled in $12.8B in stolen crypto since 2017. And more than half of that — $7.4B — happened just this year. Some analysts are saying they're behind the vast majority of all crypto theft worldwide in 2026 so far. State-backed hacking is basically its own industry at this point. Does this make you think differently about where you keep your funds? 🤔 #Crypto #CryptoSec…
Showing the 12 most recent of 971 posts we hold for @Allinvexc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Allinvexc named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 3 posts, 13 August 2026 – 15 August 2026 · confirmed gone 3 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@blumcrypto · 12,991,024#1
@catapult_extreme · 7,709,049#2
@TimeFarmChannel · 4,772,910#3
@hotonnear · 4,340,729#4
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,325,431#5
@therealyescoin · 1,951,315#6
@Holdcoin_Channel · 2,011,417#7
@boopupdates · 1,217,445#8
@cedex_io · 1,035,571#9
@Birds_announcement · 1,425,155#10
@spinnercoin · 1,275,780#11
@dogs · 6,506,149#12
@monorixofficial · 1,231,935#13
@theyescoin · 5,221,431#14
@hamster_kombat · 19,776,658#15
@notcoin · 7,949,184#16
@the_signal_24 · 5,464,533#17
@seedupdates · 7,370,459#18
@boomloudcoin · 1,564,142#19
@dotcoincommunity · 3,673,582#20
@catizenann · 3,341,697#21
@tapswapai · 9,707,108#22
@tomarket_ai · 5,996,966#23
@hexnio · 1,856,617#24
@theTapCoins · 2,698,106#25
@pigscrew · 1,979,151#26
@the_vertus · 1,996,955#27
@Cats_housewtf · 7,148,692#28
@rockyrabbitio · 3,279,305#29
@realgoats_channel · 4,254,877#30
@banana_update · 1,303,000#31
@builders · 3,259,709#32
@trendingapps · 3,583,944#33
@WILD_EC0SYSTEM · 1,008,148#34
@avagoldcoin · 1,614,817#35
@gram · 6,288,372#36
@pixelverse_xyz · 2,945,636#37
@watbird · 1,381,960#38
@catgoldminerann · 840,891#39
@nomis_protocol · 1,445,612#40
@walt_news · 3,320,168#41
@onus_globalchannel · 1,520,157#42
@diamoremarket · 318,190#43
@token_1win · 2,803,767#44
@tonstationgames · 2,919,657#45
@AmioCommunity · 1,540,569#46
@pocketfi · 1,666,045#47
@gameechannel · 1,786,350#48
@notboredpuppies_news · 1,071,644#49
@mediarussia · 2,021,210#50
@babydogecoin · 953,402#51
@Monkey_on_TON · 760,832#52
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 3,593,252#53
@smpl_app · 1,515,144#54
@autoruss · 768,922#55
@matchain_fam · 1,653,688#56
@CloutCoinSol · 906,358#57
@Coin_Strategist · 954,465#58
@cactusbox · 303,127#59
@aquaprotocolxyzchannelen · 713,057#60
@metazoneofficial · 526,037#61
@TaskNChannel · 844,233#62
@obixtoken · 491,090#63
@deckforge_official · 1,914,578#64
@birdton · 770,965#65
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,020,230#66
@CryptoAirdrop · 509,750#67
@pepe_miner_community · 264,284#68
@EraOfExplorers · 663,085#69
@battle_games_com · 2,457,991#70
@atarappai · 799,474#71
@gemswall · 1,290,478#72
@iamalexfalcon · 2,831,535#73
@theYescoin_News · 308,624#74
@zeehnpolsaz · 142,850#75
@mrdigiarz · 62,842#76
@LLchain_ai · 28,459#77
@durov · 10,148,044#78
@corn_battles · 980,990#79
@hayzonn · 2,587,321#80
@WagmiHub_News · 1,020,528#81
@zp_cryptotraining · 85,065#82
@tabdealplatform · 555,991#83
@zeehnpoolsaz · 239,698#84
@vestirussia · 915,945#85
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ApeVote_official · 24,541
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 September 2026
@LLchain_ai · 28,459
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 7 September 2026
@zeehnpolsazz · 61,047
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
@zeehnpolsaz · 142,850
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
@asacoine · 122,655
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
@zeehnpoolsaz · 239,698
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
@zp_cryptotraining · 85,065
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 August 2026
@mrdigiarz · 62,842
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Allinvex Crypto Exchange” (@Allinvexc), 133,148 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Allinvexc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.