Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ГЛАВНЫЙ ОНКОЛОГ Андрей КАПРИН

Channel

ГЛАВНЫЙ ОНКОЛОГ Андрей КАПРИН

@ADKaprin

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

32,075subscribers

-265 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001743176068
TypeChannel
Username@ADKaprin
DescriptionЗаслуженный врач РФ Академик РАН и РАО Генеральный директор НМИЦ радиологии Минздрава России 📞+7 (495) 150-11-22 ✉️ [email protected] 🌐new.nmicr.ru
Created11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ADKaprin

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ADKaprin/1594 · this entry28 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC@nmicr/764528 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC1.002.3 hours
@nmicr/765428 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC@ADKaprin/1604 · this entry28 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC1.007 minutes
@ADKaprin/1605 · this entry28 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC@nmicr/765528 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC1.00under a minute
@nmicr/82436 Nov 2026, 13:11 UTC@ADKaprin/1631 · this entry6 Nov 2026, 13:11 UTC1.00under a minute
@nmicr/827013 Nov 2026, 08:13 UTC@ADKaprin/1633 · this entry13 Nov 2026, 08:13 UTC1.00under a minute
@ADKaprin/1634 · this entry13 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC@nmicr/827113 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@nmicr6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@nmicr (4–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 4 of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 49 comparable posts for this entry, running 21 June 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

32,07532,34332,2096 August 2026 — 32,340 subscribers6 August 2026 — 32,339 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,343 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32,340 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,336 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,334 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,335 subscribers13 August 2026 — 32,338 subscribers14 August 2026 — 32,329 subscribers16 August 2026 — 32,320 subscribers17 August 2026 — 32,316 subscribers18 August 2026 — 32,313 subscribers23 August 2026 — 32,304 subscribers24 August 2026 — 32,303 subscribers26 August 2026 — 32,304 subscribers26 August 2026 — 32,295 subscribers27 August 2026 — 32,291 subscribers28 August 2026 — 32,278 subscribers29 August 2026 — 32,270 subscribers30 August 2026 — 32,266 subscribers31 August 2026 — 32,265 subscribers1 September 2026 — 32,253 subscribers2 September 2026 — 32,239 subscribers7 September 2026 — 32,236 subscribers10 September 2026 — 32,240 subscribers12 September 2026 — 32,236 subscribers14 September 2026 — 32,231 subscribers15 September 2026 — 32,227 subscribers17 September 2026 — 32,230 subscribers29 September 2026 — 32,207 subscribers5 October 2026 — 32,222 subscribers9 October 2026 — 32,218 subscribers14 October 2026 — 32,227 subscribers15 October 2026 — 32,224 subscribers16 October 2026 — 32,220 subscribers17 October 2026 — 32,215 subscribers18 October 2026 — 32,208 subscribers19 October 2026 — 32,207 subscribers20 October 2026 — 32,201 subscribers21 October 2026 — 32,200 subscribers22 October 2026 — 32,197 subscribers23 October 2026 — 32,187 subscribers24 October 2026 — 32,177 subscribers25 October 2026 — 32,173 subscribers26 October 2026 — 32,170 subscribers27 October 2026 — 32,165 subscribers29 October 2026 — 32,156 subscribers30 October 2026 — 32,150 subscribers31 October 2026 — 32,138 subscribers1 November 2026 — 32,131 subscribers1 November 2026 — 32,126 subscribers2 November 2026 — 32,123 subscribers4 November 2026 — 32,127 subscribers4 November 2026 — 32,125 subscribers5 November 2026 — 32,121 subscribers6 November 2026 — 32,112 subscribers7 November 2026 — 32,111 subscribers9 November 2026 — 32,103 subscribers10 November 2026 — 32,095 subscribers13 November 2026 — 32,075 subscribers6 August 202613 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 99 days, net -265. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,035–32,383 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 01:2832,075-20
10 Nov 2026, 18:4732,095-8
9 Nov 2026, 03:3132,103-8
7 Nov 2026, 20:2832,111-1
6 Nov 2026, 21:1432,112-9
5 Nov 2026, 22:4932,121-4
4 Nov 2026, 23:1032,125-2
4 Nov 2026, 00:3832,127+4
2 Nov 2026, 22:5632,123-3
1 Nov 2026, 21:5832,126-5
1 Nov 2026, 00:0132,131-7
31 Oct 2026, 03:0932,138-12
30 Oct 2026, 02:2932,150-6
29 Oct 2026, 02:5532,156-9
27 Oct 2026, 23:3732,165-5
26 Oct 2026, 21:4932,170-3
25 Oct 2026, 20:2632,173-4
24 Oct 2026, 19:4032,177-10
23 Oct 2026, 18:0832,187-10
22 Oct 2026, 14:3932,197first reading

Engagement

52 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 177 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 32,075 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,290
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.826%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 52 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held52 (21 June 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total39,460
Reactions total326
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 09:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
384
Videos
342
Links
413

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1h 30m
Average length
45m 02s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,016 reactions across 51 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,00249.7%
👍45722.7%
👏25512.6%
🔥23611.7%
🎉482.38%
🥰80.397%
🕊30.149%
😢30.149%
🤔20.099%
👎10.05%
😘10.05%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,016 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (8.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC≈1,090 views14 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Дорогие друзья! Запись ПРЯМОГО ЭФИРА ГЛАВНОГО ОНКОЛОГА по ссылке: VK: https://vk.ru/wall-89382804_4817 Спасибо за Ваше участие и интересные вопросы!

👍8🔥5❤1

13 Nov 2026, 08:13 UTC≈1,160 views2 reactionsread 14 November 2026

⚡️Прямо сейчас идёт прямой эфир Главного онколога Минздрава России Академика РАН и РАО Генерального директора ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России ⚡️Присоединяйтесь и задавайте ваши вопросы : VK: https://vk.ru/wall-89382804_4817 Сайт: https://glavonco.ru

❤2

12 Nov 2026, 12:27 UTC≈1,570 views22 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

ПРЯМОЙ ЭФИР 13 ноября| 11:00 На прошлой неделе мы впервые провели наш прямой эфир в новом формате — вместе с коллегами, за одним столом собрали команду специалистов НМИЦ радиологии, чтобы посмотреть на ваши вопросы с позиций разных медицинских специальностей. И, судя по вашим откликам, такой формат оказался действительно востребованным. Поэтому решили продолжать. Завтра, 13 ноября в 11:00, вновь встречаемся на наше…

❤22

6 Nov 2026, 13:11 UTC≈3,040 views20 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Дорогие друзья! Запись ПРЯМОГО ЭФИРА ГЛАВНОГО ОНКОЛОГА по ссылке: VK: https://vkvideo.ru/video-89382804_456239263 Спасибо за Ваше участие и интересные вопросы!

❤20

5 Nov 2026, 11:52 UTC≈3,010 views56 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Дорогие друзья, добрый день. За время наших встреч я не раз замечал: многие вопросы, которые вы присылаете, находятся на стыке нескольких медицинских специальностей. В онкологии это совершенно естественно, ведь решение о диагностике и тактике лечения пациента нередко требует мнения сразу нескольких специалистов. Поэтому завтра, 6 ноября в 15:00, мы с Вами запускаем обновленный формат наших встреч. Я приглашу к нашем…

❤34🔥22

30 Oct 2026, 11:05 UTC≈3,850 views25 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Дорогие друзья! Запись ПРЯМОГО ЭФИРА ГЛАВНОГО ОНКОЛОГА по ссылке: VK: https://vk.ru/wall-89382804_4679 Спасибо за Ваше участие и интересные вопросы!

❤23👍2

30 Oct 2026, 10:22 UTC≈3,680 views10 reactionsread 14 November 2026

⚡️Прямо сейчас идёт прямой эфир Главного онколога Минздрава России Академика РАН и РАО Генерального директора ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России ⚡️Присоединяйтесь и задавайте ваши вопросы : VK: https://vk.ru/wall-89382804_4679 Сайт: https://glavonco.ru

❤9👍1

29 Oct 2026, 14:40 UTC≈3,830 views32 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Друзья, завтра пятница, а значит, мы снова собираемся вместе в прямом эфире. 30 октября в 13:00, буду ждать вас и ваши вопросы. У нас будет час, чтобы поговорить о том, что вас волнует: о диагнозе, обследованиях, лечении, дальнейших шагах — обо всем, что бывает сложно понять без пояснения врача. Хочу обратить внимание на один важный момент. Формат прямого эфира в социальных сетях не может и не должен заменить полно…

❤29👍3

23 Oct 2026, 13:06 UTC≈4,280 views28 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Дорогие друзья! Запись ПРЯМОГО ЭФИРА ГЛАВНОГО ОНКОЛОГА по ссылке: VK: https://vk.ru/wall-130132233_16398 Спасибо за Ваше участие и интересные вопросы!

👍28

23 Oct 2026, 12:33 UTC≈4,110 views17 reactionsread 14 November 2026

⚡️Прямо сейчас идёт прямой эфир Главного онколога Минздрава России Академика РАН и РАО Генерального директора ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России ⚡️Присоединяйтесь и задавайте ваши вопросы : VK: https://vk.ru/wall-130132233_16398 Сайт: https://glavonco.ru

👍17

22 Oct 2026, 11:05 UTC≈4,500 views36 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Друзья, добрый день. Завтра снова встречаемся в прямом эфире. 23 октября в 15:00 буду ждать ваши вопросы, которые возникают после постановки диагноза, в процессе обследования и лечения или тогда, когда нужно лучше понять, что делать дальше. За нашими эфирами я вижу одну важную вещь: даже при совершенно разных диагнозах людям часто не хватает именно понимания происходящего. Что означают результаты обследований? Поче…

❤33👍3

16 Oct 2026, 12:04 UTC≈5,340 views64 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

Друзья, добрый день. В октябре во всем мире особое внимание уделяется проблеме рака молочной железы — самого распространенного онкологического заболевания среди женщин. Поэтому сегодня мы решили вновь показать один из наших эфиров, полностью посвященный этой теме. За годы работы я вижу, что у пациентов, столкнувшихся с этим диагнозом, возникает очень много схожих вопросов. Как правильно пройти диагностику? От чего з…

❤43🔥15👍6

Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @ADKaprin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ADKaprin edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

НМИЦ радиологии Минздрава России
@nmicr · 8,419
#1
Онкология простыми словами
@oncolya · 27,663
#2
НМИЦ онкологии им. Н.Н. Блохина Минздрава России
@nmic_blokhina · 15,350
#3
Фонд «Александра»
@pobedirak · 4,508
#4
RUSSCO - Российское общество клинической онкологии
@russco1 · 7,338
#5
Онкологика
@oncologica · 7,237
#6
НМИЦ онкологии им. Н.Н. Петрова Минздрава России
@niioncologii · 7,674
#7
Об онкологии - профессионально! НМИЦ онкологии им. Н.Н. Петрова
@NiiPetrova · 5,490
#8
Ассоциация онкологов России
@oncologyassociation · 2,676
#9
Онкология. Беседы о здоровье
@onco_beseda · 1,627
#10
Очерки фундаментальной онкологии
@oncofundamental · 8,960
#11
Вместе против рака
@protivrakaru · 3,132
#12
Доктор Максим Смолярчук. Официальный канал радиолога рентгенолога.
@drsmolyarchuk · 13,685
#13
Школа Химиотерапевтов
@schoolofchemotherapy · 5,444
#14
Рак излечим
@netonco · 6,859
#15
Oncolitatuzumab
@oncolitatuzumab · 1,565
#16
62 Московская городская онкологическая больница
@onco62 · 2,899
#17
МОД "Движение против рака"
@protivraka2008 · 2,064
#18
Rare Cancers/ Редкие Опухоли 🦞
@rarecancer · 2,117
#19
Читаем. Думаем. Живем.
@chitayemdymayem · 1,693
#20
Афиша супергероев
@oncoafisha · 451
#21
ОнкоЛикбез
@oncolikbez · 2,502
#22
🩷 РЕАБИЛИТАЦИЯ РМЖ | Лимфостаз
@ONCOREHABRUS · 7,629
#23
Опухоли Головы и Шеи
@head_and_neck_tumors · 1,474
#24
HSO community
@hsotalks · 7,280
#25
Кардиотоксичность противоопухолевого лечения.
@cardiotox · 2,511
#26
Мария Макаркина: об онкологии бережно
@dr_mariastepanova · 3,377
#27
Онко 66
@onko66 · 575
#28
Лечение рака молочной железы
@mastopathy · 5,419
#29
Онко Хелп
@helponcocanal · 1,432
#30
ЦНИИОИЗ Минздрава России
@cniioizofficial · 9,600
#31
АНО "Анастасия" для всех, кто столкнулся с онкодиагнозом🎗
@ano_anastasiya · 722
#32
МКНЦ им. А.С. Логинова
@mkncenter · 10,419
#33
Ассоциация специалистов по изучению сарком🎗
@sarcomarus · 919
#34
Очерки внутренних болезней
@internalnotes · 1,246
#35
ONCO TV
@Plans_for_life · 287
#36
Рак Простаты. Победители!
@cancerprostate · 1,846
#37
Anntaress
@annatarubarowa · 3,062
#38
Doc_shilo
@clinresearch · 4,687
#39
Около медицины
@okomed · 1,080
#40
Ассоциация «Здравствуй!»
@russcpa · 2,351
#41
Опухоль мозга / Канал
@tumorb · 2,334
#42
ОнкоАкадемия
@onco_academy · 2,402
#43
Заметки химиотерапевта
@chemonotes · 1,482
#44
Second Opinion
@second_opinion_kbran · 1,765
#45
ONCOLIVER (канал)
@ONCOLIVER · 670
#46
oncoinsight
@oncoinsight · 3,062
#47
Красножон Д.А. Хирург-онколог, маммолог
@breastcancernews · 15,822
#48
Радиоточка
@radiotochkaoncology · 2,936
#49
НЭО-НЕЙРОЭНДОКРИННЫЕ ОПУХОЛИ - КАНАЛ ПАЦИЕНТСКОЙ ГРУППЫ
@cancerneo · 1,905
#50
Доктор_Ильялов
@doctor_ilyalov · 2,335
#51
Онкогинеколог Носов
@onconosov · 2,087
#52
Здоровое общество
@healthy_project · 1,336
#53
Оксана Гончарук • МЕДКОР • Онко Школа
@medcoreschool · 6,543
#54
МИССИЯ-РЕМИССИЯ
@cervical_cancer · 2,261
#55
Oncoprotection_DAO
@oncoprotection_dao · 2,700
#56
Онкофорум «Белые ночи» | WNOF
@forumonco · 1,261
#57
Фонд «Я люблю жизнь!»
@ilovelifefund · 1,426
#58
ОНКОРУС про ОНКОЛОГИЮ
@onkorus · 1,557
#59
Якутский онкологический диспансер
@oncosakha · 1,234
#60
ЗдравКонтроль
@martynovevgueni · 214,941
#61
Поддерживающая терапия в онкологии
@rassconco · 1,078
#62
онкопитание
@onkopytanie · 2,838
#63
МИБС
@mibs_ru · 2,760
#64
Новости онкологии
@oncology_news_2022 · 10,258
#65
Что мы будем делать в понедельник утром
@cancer_care_weekly · 9,375
#66
Есть, чтобы жить. Питание для онкопациентов
@nutrien_medical · 7,609
#67
ONCOLOGY 🎗 ОНКОЛОГИЯ
@ONCOLOGYru · 3,264
#68
Минздрав России
@minzdrav_ru · 53,153
#69
Крутышки (о важном)
@onkokrutyshki · 3,604
#70
КОБЯКОВА 🄼🄳
@okobyakova · 10,235
#71
Всероссийский союз пациентов (ВСП)
@PatientsRu · 1,711
#72
Медицинская Россия
@mediamedics · 142,800
#73
Рак легких🎗Канал "Легко о раке Легких"🎗
@lungscancer · 1,645
#74
Про Паллиатив
@propalliativ · 4,159
#75
Междисциплинарное общество специалистов по опухолям печени (МОСОП)
@oncohepa · 1,133
#76
Центр персонализированной медицины
@personmknc · 622
#77
Кабинет онколога | Гронская Юлия
@gronskaya_health · 1,859
#78
Химия была, но мы расстались
@myphototherapy2021 · 637
#79
Право на здоровье
@right_to_health · 5,526
#80
Онко Твит/TWIT Oncology
@thoracicjournalclub · 792
#81
Лена против раков
@eleniel_le · 1,011
#82
Комитет ГД по охране здоровья
@komitetzdorovduma · 1,593
#83
Доктор Волченко
@dr_volchenko · 2,583
#84
Vademecum Live
@vademecum_live · 12,586
#85
Vademecum
@vademecum_ru · 12,489
#86
Рак Лёгких 🫁 Канал
@legkie1ru · 1,359
#87
Клинические исследования в онкологии
@onco_clinical_trials · 1,001
#88
Nutricia | Онкология
@nutricia_onco · 1,129
#89
БОТКИНСКАЯ БОЛЬНИЦА (Москва)
@botkinmoscow · 8,080
#90
Новости Минздрава РФ
@minzdravru · 10,883
#91
Общество онкомаммологов
@breastonco · 1,845
#92
Клиника доктора Ласкова. Онкология, гематология, химиотерапия.
@hemoncru · 4,525
#93
Мурашко по коже 🩺🏥
@murashko_med · 130,879
#94
ЦЭККМП Минздрава России
@rosmedex · 3,677
#95
Онконавигатор
@oncoguide · 2,083
#96
ВОИ ♿️ Всероссийское общество инвалидов
@voirussia · 4,666
#97
Фармсервис | Аптечная сеть
@phsv_apteka · 1,295
#98

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Инна Тулина хирург онколог, кмн
@inna_tulina_a · 30,579
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
Онкология простыми словами
@oncolya · 27,663
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Каприн, Андрей Дмитриевич (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…публикаций Каприна А. Д.] на [[Академия Google|Google Scholar]] * [https://t.me/ADKaprin Официальный Telegram-канал «Главный онколог Андрей КАПРИН»] {{ВС}}…”
read 1 November 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ГЛАВНЫЙ ОНКОЛОГ Андрей КАПРИН” (@ADKaprin), 32,075 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ADKaprin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.