Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Что мы будем делать в понедельник утром

Channel

Что мы будем делать в понедельник утром

@cancer_care_weekly

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,295subscribers

+31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001701759208
TypeChannel
Username@cancer_care_weekly
Created5 December 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cancer_care_weekly

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,2559,3029,278.56 August 2026 — 9,264 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,264 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,262 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,255 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,258 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,256 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,279 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,285 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,282 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,290 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,292 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,302 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,295 subscribers9,2956 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net +31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,248–9,309 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 10:219,295-7
13 Sept 2026, 17:409,302+10
10 Sept 2026, 05:189,292+2
4 Sept 2026, 21:169,290+8
1 Sept 2026, 01:059,282-3
28 Aug 2026, 15:049,285+6
25 Aug 2026, 19:579,279+23
22 Aug 2026, 22:279,256-2
16 Aug 2026, 19:149,258+3
13 Aug 2026, 07:269,255-7
9 Aug 2026, 20:529,262-2
6 Aug 2026, 05:159,264no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:089,264first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,334 reactions across 16 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
77658.2%
🔥30723.0%
😍614.57%
❤‍🔥473.52%
👍473.52%
💩272.02%
🎉171.27%
🤮161.20%
🙏60.45%
🍓50.375%
👎40.3%
🤣40.3%
30.225%
👏30.225%
🖕20.15%
😐20.15%
😱20.15%
🤔20.15%
🤗20.15%
👌10.075%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,444 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cancer_care_weekly. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC≈2,420 views98 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Трастузумаб-дерукстекан тем временем врывается в первую линию Her2 мутированного рака легкого! Увеличение PFS (контрольная группа chemo + pembro) !!!

🔥6026👍7💩2😐2🎉1

12 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC≈2,670 views14 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @russco1Photo

Уважаемые коллеги! Приглашаем вас принять участие в анонимном опросе, посвященном актуальным трудностям коммуникации между врачом-онкологом, пациентом и его родственниками. Цель исследования – определить наиболее распространенные организационные и клинические ситуации, требующие поддержки, обучения и разработки практических инструментов коммуникации. Пройти опрос: https://rosoncoweb.ru/surveys/communication_with_pa

👍10💩2👎1🤮1

7 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC≈4,060 views153 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Ну что!!!!!!!!!! Это победа!!!!! Для пациентов!!!!!!!!

110❤‍🔥37🙏6

7 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC≈3,560 views208 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Трастузумаб Дерукстекан (Энхерту, АстраЗенека) Показания: • HER2-положительный рак молочной железы с метастазами, ранее получивших не менее двух режимов таргетной терапии, • HER2-слабо-положительный (HER2-low) рак молочной железы при наличии метастазов после предшествующей химиотерапии, • Нерезектабельный метастатический HER2-положительный рак легкого, • Местнораспространенная или метастатическая HER2-положительная

140🔥51👍13🤮2😱2

4 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC≈3,550 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

Формулировка в консилиуме: Лечение проводить до прогрессирования или непереносимой токсичности

  1. Норм83%
  2. Стрем17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

💩2

4 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC≈3,130 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

Как правильно (формулируем диагноз)

  1. Состояние после радикальной резекции от 01.01.200856%
  2. Радикальная резекция от 01.01.200831%
  3. Радикальная резекция (01.01.2008)13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤮51

4 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC≈2,860 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

Как правильно?

  1. Данных за наличие...38%
  2. Данных о наличии...54%
  3. Да хватит уже канцелярщины, пишите нормальным языком9%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

💩21

4 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC≈2,630 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

Как правильно?

  1. Канцероматоз73%
  2. Карциноматоз15%
  3. Неважно11%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2🤮2

3 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC≈2,930 views39 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Biology trumps size (биология опухоли переселивает? размеры или даже не знают как сказать) Проанализировали большую базу flatiron, оттуда взяли в итоге 7481 пациентку и разделили на когорты - кто подходил бы под NATALEE, кто подходил бы под MonarchE (и еще там где они пересекаются) и те, кто не подходили ни туда ни сюда И посмотрели на их выживаемость. Медиана наблюдения 78 месяцев. Самое наверное клинически важно

🔥179👍7❤‍🔥2💩2👌1🤮1

2 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC≈2,850 views99 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Тем временем подкаст Между Нами Химия скоро возвращается! В этот раз мы пошли дальше, и он будет еще и в видео формате! А пока (если вдруг еще не слушали) послушайте предыдущие сезоны! А те, кто уже слушали - расскажите о нем!

63🔥23👍6😍3💩2🖕1🤣1

28 Jul 2026, 17:35 UTC≈4,860 views66 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Расскажу про «побочный» эффект маммографии. Маммографию делают миллионам (!) женщин ежегодно. Можно много говорить о number needed to screen и других «показателях эффективности» тем не менее это очень очень распространенное исследование. А оказалось вот что. На этом исследовании помимо образований в молочных железах виден еще и кальциноз артерий молочной железы. Он есть на 15- 20% скрининговых маммограмм, после 70

45🔥73🤣3👍2🤮2😍2💩1

12 Jul 2026, 05:03 UTC≈10,800 views131 reactions2 Starsread 29 August 2026
File

Тем временем вышла ASCO SEP 2026 года! По мне так это ГЛАВНАЯ настольная книга любого ординатора, а вообще и всех врачей, кто хочет освежить знания в нозологиях, с которыми не сталкивается каждый день! Ловите!

😍5636🔥19❤‍🔥8🍓5💩3👍2👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @cancer_care_weekly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTCAnonymous Poll956 voters

Формулировка в консилиуме: Лечение проводить до прогрессирования или непереносимой токсичности

  1. Норм83%
  2. Стрем17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTCAnonymous Poll976 voters

Как правильно (формулируем диагноз)

  1. Состояние после радикальной резекции от 01.01.200856%
  2. Радикальная резекция от 01.01.200831%
  3. Радикальная резекция (01.01.2008)13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTCAnonymous Poll903 voters

Как правильно?

  1. Данных за наличие...38%
  2. Данных о наличии...54%
  3. Да хватит уже канцелярщины, пишите нормальным языком9%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTCAnonymous Poll999 voters

Как правильно?

  1. Канцероматоз73%
  2. Карциноматоз15%
  3. Неважно11%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ГЛАВНЫЙ ОНКОЛОГ Андрей КАПРИН
@ADKaprin · 32,230
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
Клинфарм замес | Евгений Никитин
@tgnikitin · 44,506
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
Медицинская Литература
@clinirec · 34,336
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
Поясни за мед
@poyasni_za_med · 22,289
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 September 2026
Аккредитация врачей | Ординатура
@credit_med · 23,124
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
SYNAPSE I СИНАПС
@synapse_channel_1 · 40,119
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Pathoma Videos 2026
@Pathoma_Videos · 24,444
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 16 September 2026
Медач | Medical Channel
@medach · 28,118
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Dr.Ivashkov
@drivashkov · 34,458
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 6 September 2026
Reclin - live
@reclinlive · 30,488
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 September 2026
Занимательная эндокринология
@funwithmedicine · 22,699
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 September 2026
Ordinatura.org | Ординатура орг
@ordinatura_org · 24,329
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
Онкология простыми словами
@oncolya · 27,282
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 September 2026
Медицинская Россия
@mediamedics · 143,118
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Что мы будем делать в понедельник утром” (@cancer_care_weekly), 9,295 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cancer_care_weekly.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.