Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Что мы будем делать в понедельник утром

Channel

Что мы будем делать в понедельник утром

@cancer_care_weekly

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,371subscribers

+107 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001701759208
TypeChannel
Username@cancer_care_weekly
DescriptionПривет! Меня зовут Настя Данилова, я онколог из 62-й городской онкологической больницы Москвы. В этом канале очень много новостей с конференций, много статей с описаниями результатов, иногда бывают холивары, иногда пишу про образование!
Created5 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/cancer_care_weekly

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,2559,3759,3156 August 2026 — 9,264 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,264 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,262 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,255 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,258 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,256 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,279 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,285 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,282 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,290 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,292 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,302 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,295 subscribers26 September 2026 — 9,313 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,309 subscribers11 October 2026 — 9,321 subscribers14 October 2026 — 9,323 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,334 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,333 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,343 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,339 subscribers29 October 2026 — 9,357 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,371 subscribers5 November 2026 — 9,375 subscribers8 November 2026 — 9,371 subscribers9,3716 August 20268 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 94 days, net +107. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,237–9,393 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 13:059,371-4
5 Nov 2026, 11:199,375+4
2 Nov 2026, 06:489,371+14
29 Oct 2026, 22:179,357+18
26 Oct 2026, 22:509,339-4
24 Oct 2026, 00:059,343+10
21 Oct 2026, 07:459,333-1
18 Oct 2026, 02:009,334+11
14 Oct 2026, 21:569,323+2
11 Oct 2026, 15:389,321+12
5 Oct 2026, 03:209,309-4
26 Sept 2026, 05:169,313+18
17 Sept 2026, 10:219,295-7
13 Sept 2026, 17:409,302+10
10 Sept 2026, 05:189,292+2
4 Sept 2026, 21:169,290+8
1 Sept 2026, 01:059,282-3
28 Aug 2026, 15:049,285+6
25 Aug 2026, 19:579,279+23
22 Aug 2026, 22:279,256first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.4%
avg views ÷ 9,371 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,380
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held27 (17 June 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total21,400
Reactions total514
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 22:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,360
Videos
≈47
Links
≈325

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,848 reactions across 25 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤96852.4%
🔥36819.9%
👍874.71%
😁784.22%
😍613.30%
❤‍🔥472.54%
💔321.73%
💩271.46%
😨251.35%
🤪251.35%
😱211.14%
🙈180.974%
🎉170.92%
🤮160.866%
⚡100.541%
😢100.541%
🤡70.379%
🙏60.325%
🍓50.271%
👎40.216%
7 further kinds160.866%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,958 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 27 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cancer_care_weekly. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 03:52 UTC≈1,120 views18 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @oncology_news_2022Photo

Дорогие коллеги - онкологи! В преддверии Российского онкологического конгресса приглашаем вас принять участие в анонимном опросе RUSSCO о профилактике онкологических заболеваний. Мы изучаем, как онкологи в России относятся к профилактике онкологических заболеваний, как применяют её в практике и что этому мешает. 📚 Ваши ответы помогут подготовить клинические материалы, образовательные программы и предложения по орг…

❤18

2 Nov 2026, 18:07 UTC≈2,360 views176 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Сижу, никому не мешаю! Мне приходит письмо от официального сайта Lobular Breast Cancer Alliance. И не просто письмо. А приглашение на charity ужин, задача которого собрать деньги на исследования в области долькового рака молочной железы. Я уже в голове начала выбирать себе платье, думала как рядом с главными исследователями будем что-то обсуждать. В письме было мало информации, нужно было всего лишь перейти по ссы…

😁75💔32😨25😱19❤14😢10🔥1

29 Oct 2026, 08:04 UTC≈3,340 views91 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Войну ИИ презентациям объявили все!

❤58👍15⚡7🔥6🤡5

28 Oct 2026, 19:29 UTC≈2,990 views51 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Poll

Пока лечу домой, выбираем самый отпетый (не выговариваемый) конъюгат

  1. Плозализумаб плевистинаг36%
  2. Тамботатуг пелитекан6%
  3. Изалонтамаб бренгитекан17%
  4. Мозистобарт зоратолимод51%
  5. Рисвутатуг резетекан8%
  6. Калотатуг гинистинаг16%

The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🤪25🙈18❤6🤡2

27 Oct 2026, 14:22 UTC≈2,760 views84 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

В последний день конгресса сбежали в пригород Мадрида в национальный парк La Pedriza. Потрясающе красивый с очень непонятной навигацией пеших троп;) Но все успели, посмотрели, а потом еще съели в кафе у заправки сногсшибательный горошек с хамоном! Теперь можно и домой собираться!

❤62🔥15👍7

27 Oct 2026, 06:27 UTC≈2,160 views35 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍18🔥14😁3

26 Oct 2026, 16:26 UTC≈2,510 views14 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Классное замечание дискутанта Джарушка Найду про дизайны нон-инфериорити Насколько общество/медицинское сообщество/регуляторы готово снизить эффективность терапии *ака noninferiority margin* чтобы деэскалировать терапию?

🔥11❤3

26 Oct 2026, 16:12 UTC≈1,930 views5 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Идея отличная: пациентов, которые находятся в частичном или полном ответе (все опухоли кроме меланомы) рандомизировали на стандартное введение иммунотерапии и более редкое (раз в 12 недель) С дизайном, на мой взгляд, намудрили. Дизайн нон-инферилрити, но смешали все опухли вместе: почка, легкое, уротелиальный рак.. По ходу исследвония оказалось, что стандартное введение лучше чем редкое, да еще и токсичность не уме…

❤5

26 Oct 2026, 15:45 UTC≈2,230 views40 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Наконец-то!!!! Мы видим прогресс в лечении остеосаркомы! Препарат Риз-Рез анти B7-H3 антитело и ингибитором топоизомеразы медиана ВБП 5.5 мес vs 1.4 и даже при условии кроссовера есть тренд к увеличению ОВ Медиана возраста этих пацентов 21 год Включали детей и взросых с 12 лет Для остеосарком это гигантский прорыв!

❤26🔥14

18 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC≈2,420 views98 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Трастузумаб-дерукстекан тем временем врывается в первую линию Her2 мутированного рака легкого! Увеличение PFS (контрольная группа chemo + pembro) !!!

🔥60❤26👍7💩2😐2🎉1

12 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC≈2,670 views14 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @russco1Photo

Уважаемые коллеги! Приглашаем вас принять участие в анонимном опросе, посвященном актуальным трудностям коммуникации между врачом-онкологом, пациентом и его родственниками. Цель исследования – определить наиболее распространенные организационные и клинические ситуации, требующие поддержки, обучения и разработки практических инструментов коммуникации. Пройти опрос: https://rosoncoweb.ru/surveys/communication_with_pa…

👍10💩2👎1🤮1

7 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC≈4,060 views153 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Ну что!!!!!!!!!! Это победа!!!!! Для пациентов!!!!!!!!

❤110❤‍🔥37🙏6

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @cancer_care_weekly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Oct 2026, 19:29 UTCAnonymous Poll386 voters

Пока лечу домой, выбираем самый отпетый (не выговариваемый) конъюгат

  1. Плозализумаб плевистинаг36%
  2. Тамботатуг пелитекан6%
  3. Изалонтамаб бренгитекан17%
  4. Мозистобарт зоратолимод51%
  5. Рисвутатуг резетекан8%
  6. Калотатуг гинистинаг16%

The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTCAnonymous Poll956 voters

Формулировка в консилиуме: Лечение проводить до прогрессирования или непереносимой токсичности

  1. Норм83%
  2. Стрем17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTCAnonymous Poll976 voters

Как правильно (формулируем диагноз)

  1. Состояние после радикальной резекции от 01.01.200856%
  2. Радикальная резекция от 01.01.200831%
  3. Радикальная резекция (01.01.2008)13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTCAnonymous Poll903 voters

Как правильно?

  1. Данных за наличие...38%
  2. Данных о наличии...54%
  3. Да хватит уже канцелярщины, пишите нормальным языком9%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTCAnonymous Poll999 voters

Как правильно?

  1. Канцероматоз73%
  2. Карциноматоз15%
  3. Неважно11%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ГЛАВНЫЙ ОНКОЛОГ Андрей КАПРИН
@ADKaprin · 32,103
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
Клинфарм замес | Евгений Никитин
@tgnikitin · 44,098
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
Медицинская Литература
@clinirec · 36,244
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
Поясни за мед
@poyasni_za_med · 22,216
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 September 2026
Аккредитация врачей | Ординатура
@credit_med · 23,156
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
Техника за 30% | Аккаунты сплит
@synapse_channel_1 · 28
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Pathoma Videos 2026
@Pathoma_Videos · 24,330
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 16 September 2026
Медач | Medical Channel
@medach · 27,944
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Dr.Ivashkov
@drivashkov · 34,408
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 6 September 2026
Reclin - live
@reclinlive · 31,471
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 September 2026
Занимательная эндокринология
@funwithmedicine · 22,750
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 September 2026
Ordinatura.org | Ординатура орг
@ordinatura_org · 24,174
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
Онкология простыми словами
@oncolya · 27,618
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 September 2026
MD.school | Медицинский онлайн-университет | Доказательная медицина
@medicina_discendi · 21,242
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 September 2026
Медицинская Россия
@mediamedics · 142,949
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Что мы будем делать в понедельник утром” (@cancer_care_weekly), 9,371 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cancer_care_weekly.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.