Channel
@okponytale
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
42subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002872316389 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @okponytale |
| Description | Предложка - https://t.me/OkponyBot Или пишите в ЛС данного канала Ютуб: www.youtube.com/@ОКПОНЯЛ Чат для работяг: https://t.me/ponimaeshhh Донат: https://www.donationalerts.com/r/ok_gotcha Бусти: https://boosty.to/okponyal Патреон: patreon.com/okpony |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/okponytale |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 42 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 42 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 10 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
26 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤔 | 9 | 34.6% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 19.2% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 15.4% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 11.5% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 7.69% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 3.85% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 3.85% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 3.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 31 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Нарушители общественного спокойствия, а кто из вас рисовать умеет? Это я ни к чему не подвязываю вопрос, просто стало интересно, сколько среди вас талантливых людей, или вы в рисовании такие же бездарности как и я . хотя почему только в рисовании Кароче, скидывайте свои работы в комментариях. P.S.: кто скинет анимэ или фуррей, тому по жопе
🤔3
Все уже посмотрели видос?
🤔2🥰2
понимайте как хотите
Но вообще, знаете, то что два людоедыча из противоположных лагерей с кайфом общаются, и при этом считают взгляды миролюбивого чела Дедпи либо тупыми (Маргинал), либо неиронично русофобскими (Бэбэй) - это конечно о многом говорит. Ты можешь быть за одну сторону, ты можешь быть за противоположную, всегда можно сказать "да чел принципы хуйня ты мне друг". Но не дай Бог тебе оказаться нейтральным адекватычем... Тебя сожр…
🤔2😁1
Кароч, апдейт по гей-драме Если кратко - Маргинал и Бэбэй типа дружбаны. Не то, чтобы лучшие, это бы сделало историю уморительной. Нет, так, осторожничая, Маргинал говорит что мол, дружииище, мы же так с тобой общались, приходи на коллабу. А то что у тебя зетная аудитория, а у меня заукраинская - ну да и поебать на этих гоев, принципы хуйня, важнее личные отношения (цитата). Ну и ответ Бэбэя совсем уж не походит на ч…
👍1
Чуваки, пока вы пердели в диван, я пересмотрел все топовое аниме в мире. Вот, мои любимые аниме персонажи: Гаку Навата, Татсуя Ито, Хотару Ямагучи, Акито Фукумори, Косуке Киношита, Соя Фудживара, Содай Хасукава, Юто Ивасаки, Таиро Хираока, и многие многие другие 😊
👍3
Photo, posted without a caption
🤔2
Voice message, posted without a caption
😁1
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
🍌1
Криенпепе
Патпещик ожидал годноту,а вляпался в мое видео:
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @okponytale. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ОК, понял” (@okponytale), 42 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/okponytale.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.