Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Министерство Логики

Channel

Министерство Логики

@minlogiki

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,908subscribers

-130 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001497326411
TypeChannel
Username@minlogiki
DescriptionПравила комьюнити Министерство Логики ► https://goo.su/XWLsciX Разбан► @chimchir_bot и команда /unban Предложка► @chimchir_bot Министерский чат► @minlogiki_chat Министерство Логики в MAX► https://goo.su/1RPob
Created9 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/minlogiki

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,9087,0386,9736 August 2026 — 7,038 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,038 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,033 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,026 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,021 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,013 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,011 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,013 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,000 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,988 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,991 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,992 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,987 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,983 subscribers29 September 2026 — 6,957 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,949 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,947 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,944 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,938 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,934 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,925 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,919 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,912 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,911 subscribers6 November 2026 — 6,909 subscribers9 November 2026 — 6,908 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 95 days, net -130. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,889–7,058 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 00:466,908-1
6 Nov 2026, 03:196,909-2
3 Nov 2026, 13:296,911-1
31 Oct 2026, 06:556,912-7
28 Oct 2026, 04:076,919-6
25 Oct 2026, 00:076,925-9
21 Oct 2026, 17:466,934-4
18 Oct 2026, 04:376,938-6
15 Oct 2026, 09:366,944-3
12 Oct 2026, 19:476,947-2
5 Oct 2026, 23:416,949-8
29 Sept 2026, 01:206,957-26
16 Sept 2026, 03:186,983-4
12 Sept 2026, 18:216,987-5
8 Sept 2026, 16:426,992+1
3 Sept 2026, 06:186,991+3
31 Aug 2026, 07:266,988-12
28 Aug 2026, 04:127,000-13
24 Aug 2026, 23:577,013+2
21 Aug 2026, 18:377,011first reading

Engagement

136 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.4%
avg views ÷ 6,908 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,580
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 136 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held136 (5 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total46,516
Reactions total597
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 16:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈12,200
Videos
≈7,300
Links
≈4,190

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
19m 41s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,159 reactions across 111 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁71522.6%
💩49915.8%
🤣39912.6%
🔥37111.7%
❤2247.09%
👍1845.82%
🤔1394.40%
👀973.07%
💯611.93%
👏501.58%
🫡461.46%
❤‍🔥431.36%
🖕381.20%
🥰381.20%
😱331.04%
🤡270.855%
😢250.791%
🤯240.76%
👌230.728%
🏆210.665%
21 further kinds1023.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 127 of the 136 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,607 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 136 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 127 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @minlogiki. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 136 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (19.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 16:06 UTCviews —

Министерство Логики pinned «⚡️СТРИМА АНОНС начало в 19:05 мск 🟢ЖИВОЙ ПОДКАСТ с Андреем Оранжевым - главным фанатом Стаса Ай как Просто (спросим за базар паренька) https://youtu.be/-kUcrsOpdgY ❗️Тормозит YouTube? Тогда смотри стрим тут ► https://live.vkplay.ru/minlogiki тут ► ht…»

10 Nov 2026, 14:01 UTC648 views22 reactionsread 10 November 2026

⚡️СТРИМА АНОНС начало в 19:05 мск 🟢ЖИВОЙ ПОДКАСТ с Андреем Оранжевым - главным фанатом Стаса Ай как Просто (спросим за базар паренька) https://youtu.be/-kUcrsOpdgY ❗️Тормозит YouTube? Тогда смотри стрим тут ► https://live.vkplay.ru/minlogiki тут ► https://boosty.to/minlogiki тут ► https://vk.com/minlogiki тут ► https://vkvideo.ru/@minlogiki и тут ► https://rutube.ru/channel/13127019/ 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤Поддержать автора и з…

🔥17💩2🤔2👏1

9 Nov 2026, 14:13 UTC≈1,220 views45 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Завтра стрим с гостем

👀29💩6🔥6🤔2🤨2

9 Nov 2026, 07:05 UTC≈1,410 views57 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

#предложка ---прислал Дмитрий ---Хочешь прислать тоже? Это ЗДЕСЬ

🤣28🔥20💩4😁3💊2

8 Nov 2026, 09:36 UTC≈1,590 views33 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Что там со светом в Куеве?

🫡15💩10😁8

8 Nov 2026, 09:04 UTC≈1,540 views35 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤33💩2

7 Nov 2026, 21:39 UTC≈1,550 views14 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

❤12💩2

7 Nov 2026, 16:07 UTCviews —

Министерство Логики pinned «⚡️СТРИМА АНОНС начало в 19:05 мск 🟢 БАЗОВЫЙ ОБЗЁР на то как ЗИО унизил и задоминировал Мэдисона https://youtu.be/b8YqQBdpEdE ❗️Тормозит YouTube? Тогда смотри стрим тут ► https://live.vkplay.ru/minlogiki тут ► https://boosty.to/minlogiki тут ► https:/…»

7 Nov 2026, 15:27 UTC≈1,620 views27 reactionsread 10 November 2026

⚡️СТРИМА АНОНС начало в 19:05 мск 🟢 БАЗОВЫЙ ОБЗЁР на то как ЗИО унизил и задоминировал Мэдисона https://youtu.be/b8YqQBdpEdE ❗️Тормозит YouTube? Тогда смотри стрим тут ► https://live.vkplay.ru/minlogiki тут ► https://boosty.to/minlogiki тут ► https://vk.com/minlogiki тут ► https://vkvideo.ru/@minlogiki и тут ► https://rutube.ru/channel/13127019/ 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤Поддержать автора и задать вопрос в прямом эфире можно тут ►…

🔥20💩4🤣2👍1

5 Nov 2026, 21:31 UTC≈1,890 views27 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

👍13💩8🖕2🤡2😴2

Showing the 12 most recent of 136 posts we hold for @minlogiki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Oct 2026, 12:20 UTCFinal Results163 voters

Какие? (и те и те +/- 65к обойдутся)

  1. УНО58%
  2. ДОС46%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 136 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

James Alone Official Entertainment System
@jamesaloneteam · 37,850
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
Брянск | События | Подслушано
@Bryansk_podslushal · 36,218
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 20 September 2026
НВОРК
@N_4an · 19,067
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 October 2026
Зио
@zio402 · 43,480
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 27 August 2026
Мятежник Джек
@rebel_jack_review · 21,338
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 September 2026
MountShow
@mountshow · 55,730
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
PØZØR PØLKÅ/ПОЗОР ПОЛКА🤞
@pozor_polka1 · 20,447
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 27 September 2026
Мэмисон (поиск мемов)
@memsearch · 47,402
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Министерство Логики” (@minlogiki), 6,908 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/minlogiki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.