Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Журнал ЖОЖ

@journal_joj

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,397subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001708112117
TypeChannel
Username@journal_joj
DescriptionЖОЖ - это издание, созданное для тех, кто любит умный юмор и иронические замечания. В нашем паблике можно найти мощные карикатуры, иллюстрации на злободневные темы и остроумные статьи. Поддержать работу художников: 5336 6902 7153 7609 (Сбербанк)
Created20 June 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/journal_joj

Growth

9,3979,4299,4136 August 2026 — 9,428 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,428 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,429 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,410 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,397 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,392–9,434 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:359,397-13
9 Aug 2026, 12:389,410-19
6 Aug 2026, 19:239,429+1
6 Aug 2026, 02:509,428no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:139,428first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
71.4%
avg views ÷ 9,397 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,710
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held24 (10 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total127,450
Reactions total4,324
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,740
Videos
5
Links
1,510

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

5,146 reactions across 23 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,79234.8%
1,20523.4%
👍51610.0%
🔥3907.58%
💯2534.92%
🥰1502.91%
1282.49%
🤡941.83%
🤪721.40%
😐571.11%
👻541.05%
🤔541.05%
🍓470.913%
😱450.874%
🍌370.719%
🤩350.68%
❤‍🔥280.544%
🗿260.505%
🫡260.505%
😭160.311%
16 further kinds1212.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,423reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 24 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @journal_joj. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC≈1,470 views140 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Фанарт от Loudorc162 Делайте это упражнение каждый день и спина болеть не будет!

🥰75😁48🙈7🍌43🤔2🍓1

11 Aug 2026, 07:08 UTC≈3,870 views315 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мы живем в проклятом таймлайне. На днях режиссер Уилл Глак, снимающий романтические комедии, признался, что в новой картине «One Night Only» («Всего одна ночь», «Только на одну ночь») вырезал "огромное количество" откровенных сцен из-за того, что современные зрители испытывают неловкость при виде совокупляющихся голых людей на экране. Разговоры об асексуальности зумеров и поколения альфа идут уже давно. Но нынче ре

😁242🤔42👍17👎53😱2🍌1🍓1

7 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC≈5,140 views70 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🥰48😭8🤡6🗿52🍌1

7 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC≈4,970 views173 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, отошли от ОбщеЖожа? Если ещё не делились впечатлениями, можете это сделать в комментариях под постом! Нарисовала Нафинлефт

140👍18🔥7😍3🤡2🍌1💅1🗿1

7 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC≈5,310 views337 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

6 августа на широкие экраны кинотеатров выходит «Последний богатырь. Колобок» - спинофф и приквел к совместной серии России и Диснея «Последний богатырь». Хоть Дисней и прекратил сотрудничество с отечественными киноделами, наши всё ещё пытаются хоть что-то выдоить из франшизы: так уже вышли фильм «Финист. Первый богатырь» и сериал «Последний богатырь. Наследие». И вот российского зрителя решили «порадовать» приключен

177😁107👍17🥱9🫡7🤣6🦄6🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC≈6,410 views244 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Новость, которая и не новость вовсе. Дойная корова компании Blizzard World of Warcraft рассматривается компанией Blizzard как дойная корова. В этой связи они хотят ещё больше превратить свою ММОшку в соцсеть, чтоб народ туда на пикнички и в чатики забегал чисто. Озвучание этих "планов" "стратегии на десятилетия вперед" никого не возмутило. А вот полушутка креативного директора Warcraft Криса Метцена, озвученная на

👍159👻5415😁6🤡5👏3🍌1😢1

31 Jul 2026, 15:18 UTC≈5,990 views68 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥55🤡6🗿32👍2

31 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC≈5,800 views180 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Кстати, 1 августа на Общежоже на столе нашей редакции вы сможете найти кучу пинапной мерчаги со всеми нашими маскотами! Нарисовал DAHR

128👍26🔥147🤡2💅1🤯1🥰1

29 Jul 2026, 07:12 UTC≈6,620 views283 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#дзнч Нарисовала Bed Babayka

😁22826😱22👍2🤡2🍌1💅1🤔1

28 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTC≈7,050 views310 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Из новостей массовой культуры. В мае 2026 года на большие экраны вышел фильм «Закулисье реальности», основанный «Backrooms» - одной из самых известных крипипаст последних лет. В целом фильм оставил положительное впечатление у зрителей. А вот студия-дистрибьютер А24, выпустившая эту киноленту, чуть было не заработала плохую репутацию. Backrooms появился и обрёл популярность в 2019 году. Сеттинг этой крипипасты можно

🔥23548👍19🤬5🤡2💅1

25 Jul 2026, 16:47 UTC≈6,290 views289 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Многого мы ещё не знаем о традициях грузинского застолья. Песни, вино, шашлыки и ломание носов девушкам. Туристкам из России не повезло праздновать день рождения в грузинском отеле рядом с не самым адекватным празднованием грузинской свадьбы. Они помахали ей из окошка своего гостиничного номера, а в результате их обвинили в порче оборудования, послали на три всем известные буквы, а потом "брат жениха" поднялся к ним

💯213😁389❤‍🔥8💊7🤡6😐3🤬2

24 Jul 2026, 15:17 UTC≈6,590 views71 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

44🤡17🔥4🗿3👍2🤬1

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @journal_joj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 169,263 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Журнал ЖОЖ” (@journal_joj), 9,397 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/journal_joj.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.