Channel
@zimabank
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
326,401subscribers
-2,057 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001634806745 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zimabank |
| Description | Zima Bank — your world’s first Telegram banking app & new generation bank, focused on traditional and crypto solutions. Web, social media and details: https://linktr.ee/zimabank |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zimabank |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 326,401 | -286 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 326,687 | -449 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:41 | 327,136 | -415 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 327,551 | -264 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 327,815 | -434 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:20 | 328,249 | -209 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 328,458 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
116 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 85 | 73.3% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 10.3% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 5.17% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 5.17% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 2.59% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 2.59% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.862% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2025 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎄 HAPPY NEW YEAR FROM ZIMA BANK! 2025 is the year where finance goes global-first and blockchain-native. Grateful to our community, clients, and partners — you’re the reason the future is already in motion. 💎 Wishing you: growth, freedom, strong rails, and smart capital moves. A new generation starts now. #HappyNewYear #Crypto #Tokenization #FintechFuture
🔥7❤4
#RWA #Crypto #Macro Standard Chartered forecasts explosive growth in the real-world asset (RWA) tokenization market — from today’s $35 billion to $2 trillion by 2029. ⬇️ The report cites a shift in institutional adoption as the key driver: 💬 Tokenized bonds, private credit, and real estate are leading the charge. 💬 Major financial institutions are experimenting with on-chain settlement. 💬 Regulatory clarity in Eu…
❤7
🇨🇭 #crypto #banks #bitcoin #institutional The Swiss National Bank (SNB) has disclosed a US$213 million investment in shares of companies that actively accumulate Bitcoin — marking a significant institutional move into the world’s largest crypto asset. 💡 What it means: – Central bank exposure to Bitcoin is no longer hypothetical, it’s happening. – Traditional monetary authorities are embracing digital-asset strategie…
❤2
🇪🇺 #CBDC #Europe #Crypto The ECB now targets mid-2029 for the launch of the “digital euro” — a central bank digital currency that could revolutionize how payments are made in the Eurozone. ✔️What it means: – Digitized cash backed by the central bank, ready for everyday use – Europe takes control of its payment system and financial sovereignty – A strategic anchor in the global CBDC race 💸When cash goes digital, th…
👍1
🇺🇸 #crypto #banks #payments #stablecoins Visa’s CEO announced a bold next step: support for four stablecoins operating across four unique blockchains, convertible into fiat (25+ currencies). 📌 Why it matters: – Traditional payments network embracing blockchain rails – Cross-border liquidity and settlement become crypto-native – Stablecoins shift from niche to infrastructure 🔮 The future of payments is being rebuil…
❤6👍2👏1🥰1
🇫🇷 #crypto #bitcoin #sovereignfund #France France’s UDR party, led by Éric Ciotti, proposes a bold new law: establishing a national Bitcoin reserve of ~420 000 BTC — funded through state purchases, confiscated crypto assets and mining using surplus energy. 💡What this means: – Sovereign asset diversification: diversifying beyond traditional reserves into digital gold – Institutional acceptance of BTC as reserve asset…
😁2
🇯🇵#crypto #banks #Japan #stablecoins Japan’s three largest banks — MUFG, Sumitomo Mitsui, and Mizuho — plan to jointly issue a stablecoin pegged to the yen, with possible future support for the U.S. dollar, according to Nikkei. 💡Why it matters: – Sets the stage for bank-driven stablecoins in Asia – Enables tokenized transactions across Japanese corporate networks – Traditional financial powerhouses entering crypto …
❤3
🏦 #crypto #banks #stablecoins #TradFi 🇺🇸 A consortium of major global banks — Santander, Bank of America, Barclays, Citi, and Goldman Sachs — is joining forces to launch a jointly-issued stablecoin designed for institutional use, according to Reuters. 💡 What this means: – Traditional finance is no longer resisting crypto — it’s merging with it – A unified digital token could streamline global settlements and cross-…
❤3
🇱🇺 Luxembourg takes the Bitcoin leap! The Luxembourg Intergenerational Sovereign Wealth Fund (FSIL) has officially invested 1% of its portfolio into a Bitcoin ETF, becoming the first Eurozone country to do so. 💡What it means: – Institutional trust in Bitcoin is growing across Europe – Sovereign wealth funds are diversifying into digital assets – Marks a pivotal shift toward Bitcoin’s recognition as a long-term stor…
❤3
🇪🇺 Deutsche Börse x Circle: Stablecoins Go Mainstream in Europe Deutsche Börse and Circle are exploring the use of USDC and EURC in European financial markets. 💡Why it matters: – First steps toward integrating regulated stablecoins into core EU market infrastructure – Strengthens Europe’s position in the global digital finance race – Bridges traditional finance with tokenized assets 🔮 The line between TradFi and D…
❤1
🇪🇺 Societe Generale is making its move into stablecoins — choosing Bullish Europe as the launch venue for its new USD CoinVertible (USDCV). 💡 Why it matters: – Marks one of the first European bank-issued stablecoins on a major exchange – Signals growing institutional adoption of tokenized money – Strengthens Europe’s role in the global digital asset race 🔮 A pivotal step where TradFi meets DeFi, with banks taking s…
❤3
🇺🇸 SEC under Paul Atkins launches Project Crypto — bold plan to move U.S. financial markets on-chain and rewrite securities rules to match blockchain reality. 🔹 New guidelines to classify crypto tokens clearly 🔹 Rules to enable tokenized securities and trading 🔹 Emphasis on innovation, clarity, and lighter regulation 💎 Big shift: TradFi embracing the ledger. Markets on blockchain are no longer a vision — they’re be…
👏2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zimabank. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 261,685 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zima Bank” (@zimabank), 326,401 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zimabank.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.