National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 12 of the 12 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 2,320 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
68 measurements spanning 100 days, net +18,027. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 377,945–405,160 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 68
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Nov 2026, 22:15
400,407
+815
11 Nov 2026, 04:19
399,592
-23
9 Nov 2026, 13:58
399,615
-194
8 Nov 2026, 02:31
399,809
-19
7 Nov 2026, 01:16
399,828
-52
6 Nov 2026, 00:19
399,880
-152
4 Nov 2026, 20:51
400,032
-142
3 Nov 2026, 21:39
400,174
-154
2 Nov 2026, 19:49
400,328
-107
1 Nov 2026, 19:40
400,435
-103
31 Oct 2026, 17:31
400,538
-113
30 Oct 2026, 20:39
400,651
-173
29 Oct 2026, 23:05
400,824
-128
28 Oct 2026, 20:28
400,952
-204
27 Oct 2026, 18:17
401,156
-148
26 Oct 2026, 21:19
401,304
-208
25 Oct 2026, 19:27
401,512
-213
24 Oct 2026, 16:19
401,725
+213
23 Oct 2026, 16:27
401,512
-56
22 Oct 2026, 15:17
401,568
first reading
Engagement
2,649 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 203 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.77%
avg views ÷ 400,407 subscribers
Avg views / post
19,100
794 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
794
of 2,649 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 793 of 794 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held
2,649 (5 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total
15,149,788
Reactions total
164,194
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 14:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈86,800
Videos
≈30,900
Links
≈45,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4h 13m
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 411 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
218,561 reactions across 999 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
33,834
15.5%
🤣
33,066
15.1%
❤
32,408
14.8%
👎
24,560
11.2%
👍
22,014
10.1%
🙏
12,653
5.79%
😱
11,616
5.31%
😢
9,413
4.31%
😁
6,753
3.09%
🔥
6,205
2.84%
🤯
4,650
2.13%
💯
2,643
1.21%
💔
2,231
1.02%
❤🔥
2,098
0.96%
🕊
1,957
0.895%
🤔
1,719
0.787%
🥰
1,222
0.559%
😐
1,153
0.528%
🗿
1,084
0.496%
☃
1,022
0.468%
17 further kinds
6,260
2.86%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 999 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 218,561 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 7 October 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
1.00%
10 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
10
posts carrying an erid · 10 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
15,700
over 10 measured posts
Median views · rest
19,500
over 990 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqvQSTWv
1
4 November 2026
4 November 2026
2VtzqwZGHen
1
5 November 2026
5 November 2026
2W5zFGZGgkJ
1
30 October 2026
30 October 2026
2W5zFH4tkyY
1
29 October 2026
29 October 2026
2W5zFHZ92jT
1
8 October 2026
8 October 2026
2W5zFHnATPf
1
16 October 2026
16 October 2026
2W5zFHoXEtJ
1
30 October 2026
30 October 2026
2W5zFHuGTk6
1
11 November 2026
11 November 2026
2W5zFHuYP93
1
20 October 2026
20 October 2026
2W5zFJF6LTj
1
14 October 2026
14 October 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 7 October 2026 to 14 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 226 of 794 posts held from the last 30 days (28.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🏚 Дом, построенный в честь тайной любви, прячется в центре Ростова
На улице Горького стоит необычная пятиэтажка, известная как «Дом актёра». Её построили в 1935–1938 годах по проекту архитектора Леонида Эберга. Если посмотреть на здание сверху, можно заметить, что оно напоминает букву «З».
По городской легенде, Эберг был влюблён в актрису Зинаиду Зорич и специально придал дому такую форму — по первой букве её имени…
🔥 Мебельный магазин сгорел в Таганроге
Пожар вспыхнул днём 14 ноября на улице Фрунзе, 79/6. Огонь охватил 150 квадратов. Его продолжают тушить.
👉 Это Ростов! Подпишись
📨 Прислать новость
💢 Подпишись на наш канал в МАХ и узнавай новости первым
⚖️ Логвиненко могут посадить на 20 лет!
Такой прогноз озвучил политолог Евгений Михайлов. Он допускает, что в деле бывшего главы администрации Ростова появятся новые эпизоды и фигуранты - бизнесмены и бывшие подчинённые чиновника.
Михайлов утверждает, ссылаясь на неофициальную информацию, что следствие изучает работу Логвиненко и на предыдущих должностях. Названный срок - оценка политолога.
Арест бывшего градонача…
😱 «Что молодёжь творит с собой? Молодую девчонку накрыло на Днепровском! Может, позвонить кому-нибудь?», - переживает подписчица
👉 Это Ростов! Подпишись
📨 Прислать новость
💢 Подпишись на наш канал в МАХ и узнавай новости первым
😡 В парке Лога разбили ларец для добровольных пожертвований и украли деньги, которые посетители оставляли на содержание животных и поддержку парка.
Вход здесь бесплатный, а собранные средства шли на помощь парку.
👉 Это Ростов! Подпишись
📨 Прислать новость
💢 Подпишись на наш канал в МАХ и узнавай новости первым
😁 Александр Скрябин поблагодарил ростовчан, расчистивших ливнёвки
И пообещал, что службы тоже будут работать
— Ночью, в самый сильный дождь, жители переулка сами расчищали решетки. Спасибо всем, кто вышел и помог. Ночью и утром на Газетном работала бригада: ливнеприемники очистили, водоотведение восстановили, подтопление устранено. Такие же работы идут по всему городу, — написал мэр в соцсетях.
👉 Это Ростов! Подпи…
🎄В каких цветах нельзя вcтречать Новый год. Сохраните и распространите!
👉 Это Ростов! Подпишись
📨 Прислать новость
💢 Подпишись на наш канал в МАХ и узнавай новости первым
🤣40👎6❤5🫡4🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,649 posts we hold for @etorostov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@etorostov edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 40 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
РОСТОВ ГЛАВНЫЙ - РОСТОВ НОВОСТИ - 161 @rostov_glavniy · 286,838#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ЭТО РОСТОВ, ДЕТКА! 💎 @etorostov_tg · 21,762 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 September 2026
MDK Ростов @MDK_RnD · 24,309 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
Работа и вакансии в Ростове @rabotai_rostov · 32,220 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 4 September 2026
Жесть Ростов @zhest_rostov_161 · 32,410 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
Новости Ростова - Rostovnews61 @rostovnews61 · 40,796 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
РОСТОВ ГЛАВНЫЙ новости @glavnyi_rostov · 70,716 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 August 2026
Новости Ростова-на-Дону @rnd_my · 86,198 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Privet-Rostov.ru - новости Ростов-на-Дону @privet_rostov_ru · 176,415 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
РОСТОВ ГЛАВНЫЙ - РОСТОВ НОВОСТИ - 161 @rostov_glavniy · 286,838 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Новости Ростова и Области @rostov_smi · 151,267 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
ГЛАВНЫЕ НОВОСТИ РОСТОВА - НА - ДОНУ РОСТОВ ВКУРСЕ @vkurserostov · 24,196 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
РОСТОВ ПАПА РОСТОВ-НА-ДОНУ @rostovrnd · 31,410 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
АО "Донэнерго" Отключения @ao_donenergo · 37,808 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
Ростов Главный @rostovnadonuvk · 20,205 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 September 2026
ЛЕВЕНЦОВКА | СОСЕДИ | ГЛАВНЫЙ @levencovka_sosedi · 19,926 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 3 October 2026
Ростов №1 @rstv01 · 32,008 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
Подслушано Ростов-на-Дону @rostov0 · 116,444 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
Enter Ростов-на-Дону @enter_rostov · 18,978 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 October 2026
Мой Батайск @my_bataysk · 38,666 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 31 August 2026
Че по Ростову?💤 @cheRostov · 28,117 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
Ростов-на-Дону * Новости * Важное @Rostov_vajnoe · 25,101 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 September 2026
АЗОВ СОБЫТИЯ @azov_sobytiya · 29,576 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 17 here — alongside 16 others — read 8 September 2026
Блокнот Ростов @bloknot_rostov · 40,053 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
Тютина @tutina · 19,592 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 September 2026
This channel appears in 56 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Ростов-на-Дону(ru.wikipedia.org) “…ru/ Официальный портал городской Думы и Администрации города]
* [https://t.me/s/etorostov ЭТО РОСТОВ — новости Ростов-на-Дону 161]
* [http://dontourism…” read 1 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Это Ростов новости” (@etorostov), 400,407 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/etorostov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.