Уделите пять минут сейчас, чтобы программа TeamLead Conf 2026 отвечала на то, что действительно волнует вас в работе 😎 Мы продолжаем собирать программу конференции и хотим сверить её фокус с вашими текущими задачами и интересами. Для этого проводим короткий опрос: в нём всего 7 вопросов, это займёт не больше 5 минут. Ваши ответы помогут нам понять, каким темам стоит уделить больше внимания, и сделать программу ещё …

Channel
TeamLead Сonf
@TeamLeadChannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,263subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001305804929 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TeamLeadChannel |
| Description | Информационный канал крупнейшей мультиформатной конференции для тимлидов и руководителей TeamLead Conf 2026 пройдёт 3 и 4 декабря в Москве: https://teamleadconf.ru/moscow/2026 @TeamLeadTalks - здесь чат тимлидов |
| Created | 14 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TeamLeadChannel |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 5,263 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 5,262 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 5,261 | first reading |
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 20.0%
- avg views ÷ 5,263 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,050
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.405%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (26 June 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,763 |
| Reactions total | 55 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,500
- Videos
- ≈177
- Links
- ≈1,530
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 17s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
92 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 32.6% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 22.8% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 18.5% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 8.70% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 7.61% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 6.52% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.09% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.09% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 4.17%
- 1 of 24 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 1,080
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 1,110
- over 23 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFFwCVn9 | 1 | 7 July 2026 | 7 July 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Когда просят внедрить изменения без сопротивления команды... #будниТимлида
😁6❤1💯1
Почему одна заявка проходит отбор, а другая — нет? Обсудим это на онлайн-встрече с Программным комитетом TeamLead Conf 2026. 📍11 августа, 19:00 (мск) Разберём: •по каким признакам заявки проходят отбор; •чем хорошая заявка отличается от сильного доклада; •какие ошибки чаще всего приводят к отказу; •что важно не упустить при подготовке. Также участников встречи ждут: гайд по подготовке доклада, приоритетные темы с…
❤3
🚀 Ищем волонтеров на TeamLead Сибирь 📍Конференция пройдёт 10 и 11 сентября в Новосибирске Если вам интересно увидеть закулисье нашей конференции, получить опыт организации мероприятия такого масштаба и стать частью профессионального сообщества — присоединяйтесь к команде помощников-организаторов. Вас ждет: классная команда, понятные задачи и поддержка координаторов, доступ к контенту конференции, общение с эксперт…
👍2❤1
Что отметили участники Saint TeamLead Conf 2026 🌟 После каждого выступления участники оценивали доклады (и другие форматы) по двум критериям: содержание и подача. В этом посте 5 докладов, которые получили самые высокие оценки аудитории. На днях опубликуем вторую часть с недокладными форматами. После каждой конференции мы подводим такие итоги, и всегда интересно посмотреть, какие темы и выступления получили наибольш…
❤3
Привет, коллеги! 14 августа в 12:00 мы приглашаем на вебинар «Применение ИИ в разработке: переход к AI-native SDLC». Что обсудим: ▪️почему внедрение ИИ не всегда приводит к ожидаемым результатам; ▪️как компании переходят от использования ИИ-помощников к AI-native SDLC; ▪️какие ошибки могут замедлять внедрение ИИ; ▪️что нужно изменить в процессах разработки, чтобы применять ИИ на уровне всей команды. В конце вебинар…
Какие задачи сейчас требуют вашего внимания? Друзья, мы собираем программу TeamLead Conf 2026 и хотим сфокусироваться на темах, которые действительно важны в вашей работе. Чтобы учесть актуальные задачи и интересы при подготовке программы, проводим короткий опрос и просим вас принять участие. В нём всего 7 вопросов, прохождение займёт не больше 5 минут. Ваши ответы помогут нам выбрать темы для конференции и сделат…
❤2
📍Осень, Новосибирск и два дня среди своих... TeamLead Сибирь пройдет 10–11 сентября, программа уже собрана, и нам не терпится показать, ради чего ехать. ✏️ Тема года у нас одна и большая: AI. За последний год он тихо перебрался из новостей в обычный рабочий день тимлида, в код, в найм, в оценку команды, в разговоры с бизнесом про деньги. Мы отдали этому целый трек и позвали тех, кто уже прошел через внедрение: 🤩X5…
❤2🔥2
Планируете подать заявку на TeamLead Conf 2026? Тогда не пропустите онлайн-встречу с Программным комитетом. 📍11 августа, 19:00 (мск) Разберём: 🟣по каким признакам заявки проходят отбор, 🟣чем хорошая заявка отличается от сильного доклада, 🟣какие ошибки чаще всего приводят к отказу 🟣и что важно не упустить при подготовке. Можно будет задать свои вопросы напрямую Программному комитету. А ещё участников встречи ждут …
❤1👍1
🔥 Разыгрываем 3 билета на TeamLead Сибирь Условие простое: пройти наш опрос про AI в работе тимлида. На все 14 вопросов уйдет 3-6 минут. Спрашиваем, какие задачи вы уже отдали AI и что из этого получилось. Из ответов соберем срез того, как это устроено у тимлидов в России. 🧭Дедлайн прохождения: 14 августа. Трех победителей выберем с помощью рандомайзера. Остальным пришлем промокод на скидку 10% на билет. Полный …
🎉2🔥2❤🔥1🥰1
Выгорание инженеров, найм в эпоху ИИ, командная работа, лидерство и новые требования к разработчикам. В сегодняшнем дайджесте — исследования, аналитика и экспертный взгляд на трансформацию инженерной профессии. 🔴The 2026 engineer paradox: more capable, but more alone. ИИ делает инженеров более автономными, но разрушает командную коллаборацию и передачу знаний. Исследование 133 open-source проектов показывает, что 6…
❤3👍2
Компании всё чаще внедряют агентную разработку, но пока сложно понять, насколько широко этот подход используется, какие сценарии действительно работают и с какими сложностями сталкиваются команды. Мы запускаем исследование адаптации агентной разработки и приглашаем вас принять в нём участие. Если в вашей компании уже используют AI-агентов — в разработке, тестировании, ревью кода или других процессах, — расскажите о…
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @TeamLeadChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 16,664 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@iteventsnsk · 1,0792 postsАпазиди АйТи: про IT, разработку и менеджмент
@apazidi_IT · 2,9981 postСибирские Нейросети: Речевая аналитика и малые безопасные языковые модели для бизнеса
@dialoger_tech · 2571 postНет глупых вопросов
@IT1CQA · 2771 postMoscowPython Conf Channel
@MoscowPythonConfChannel · 4571 postОнтико
@onticochannel · 4281 postРИТ++ Channel
@RITFestChannel · 4031 postTestDrivenChannel
@TestDrivenChannel · 721 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TeamLead Сonf” (@TeamLeadChannel), 5,263 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TeamLeadChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.