Channel
@who_is_bithoven
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,929subscribers
-105 since we began measuring on 15 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002190061447 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @who_is_bithoven |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/who_is_bithoven |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 21,929 | -56 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 21,985 | -49 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 22,034 | no change |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:47 | 22,034 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
331 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 211 | 63.7% | |
| ❤ | 57 | 17.2% | |
| 💩 | 14 | 4.23% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 2.72% | |
| 🍾 | 8 | 2.42% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 2.42% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 2.42% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 1.51% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 1.21% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 0.906% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.604% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.302% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.302% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 331 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2025 to 10 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hey, Bithovens! We've moved the feature for adding or changing your Bitcoin address from the Telegram mini-app to the UTXORD website only, due to Telegram's policies. Please reach out if you need any help adding or changing your Bitcoin addresses - we will guide you ☺️
👍35❤6
WHO•IS•BITHOVEN pinned «Let’s Talk TGE After observing the initial drops in the space, we realized it wouldn’t bring real profit for you, so we never committed to that path. UTXORD is about tech innovation, experimentation, and long-term value. The choice is yours - dive deeper…»
Okay, Bithovens - I’m done with today’s tests! Now heading off to prepare the Xverse wallet integration announcement. Hopefully, the Xverse team will repost it and bring more customers to UTXORD to buy your artworks. Fingers crossed! 🤞 Adeala will be back in about 6-8 hours to help with any questions you have 😊🚀 k.
👍15🥰8❤1
Just bought this one! Meow! 🐾✨
Testing Xverse wallet integration! 🚀 Bithovens, whose artwork should I buy? :) Please drop a link to your artwork’s UTXORD minting page in the chat - I’ll grab it right now! 🎨✨
👍3🔥1
🔥 Sold artworks: check your earnings! 🔥 We’ve put together a list of users whose artworks have been SOLD💰 Here it is: @Kb12271 @lazyreporta @ozie0z @kamshi4u @tinkkiwinkki @davee149 @amir_torkamani @greatnessuniverse @oluwakemiadewole_ @mrasms14 @iam5588 @helloedisantoso @muhd_opera @krizq13 @alfonso @Phophaphy @Ramjan8292 @vagorbanov @Dspthrbdcjskw @Daysos (2 artworks) @basquiattoh @saeidshokohi @lxwhvrm @zaap_tv…
👍21❤8
So far, 67 of your artworks have been sold! How’s everything going? Winners, were you able to check your balances? Bithovens, would you like us to publish a list of those whose works have been sold? 🚀
👍14
Hey fam, we've put together a step-by-step video tutorial on how to mint Ordinals on the UTXORD Genetic Launchpad. Now you can watch it here: 🎥: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKynblOTwfE
👍11🔥1
Congrats to the first co-creators with sold artworks! 🎉 In the SUPER DUPER BEACH BALLS Bitcoin NFT collection, which you contributed to, 65 artworks have been sold! 🎨💥 Creators of 52 artworks have provided their Bitcoin addresses - if you're one of them, you can check your revenue share. More sales and events ahead - stay tuned! 🚀
👍15🍾8
Let’s Talk TGE After observing the initial drops in the space, we realized it wouldn’t bring real profit for you, so we never committed to that path. UTXORD is about tech innovation, experimentation, and long-term value. The choice is yours - dive deeper and explore the new opportunities we’re uncovering, or stay focused on TGEs. We don’t want to put you at risk, which is why TGE isn’t our priority.
👍31👏9❤7🤔4
We are grateful to the 12K+ members of the Who Is Bithoven community for co-creating a Bitcoin NFT collection with XCPinata and for the 35K+ amazing creations you made. Honestly, none of us expected such a surge. Much love! It was a huge pleasure working with you! Read more.
👍11❤9😁1
Last chance to mint your favorite ball at the current price from the Super Duper Beach Balls collection and become one of the first holders! What’s so special about it: ✨10.000 pieces ✨Curated by Sotheby’s selling artist - XCPinata ✨Recreated with AI ✨Co-created by almost 10.000 people ✨Backed by Bitcoin-based Genetic Provenance by UTXORD The price change: 10 am PST, February 11th 👀 Time to join the history: http…
👍2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @who_is_bithoven. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WHO•IS•BITHOVEN” (@who_is_bithoven), 21,929 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/who_is_bithoven.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.