Channel
@effort_never_betrays_U
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,183subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003172464972 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @effort_never_betrays_U |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/effort_never_betrays_U |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 2,183 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 2,186 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 2,188 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 2,188 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 13,819 |
| Reactions total | 129 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
285 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 235 | 82.5% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 8.77% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 4.56% | |
| 🐳 | 5 | 1.75% | |
| custom 5422538735394766352 | 4 | 1.40% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 1.05% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 285reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
우리가 이미 다 아는 킹터린치 햄 이야긴데, 또 한 번 곱씹기 좋게 설명되어있네요 ㅎ 함 쓱 보심 좋을 듯 합니다. 가장 공감되는 문구는 이거네요. “사실 보는 것까지는 모두가 다한다. 하지만 보고나서 파고드는 것은 아무나 못한다.” - 이상 캐시캣을 보기만 하고 파고들지 않았던 과거의 나를 회상하며 - https://youtu.be/oE6PWcQQHn8?si=zzIPPdW82CvqRtWH
❤2
만약 내일 국장에서 다시 하락하면 타이트하게 롱잡을 계획 이미 하리에선 개처럼 물려있음 저기에 바낸포지션까지 하면 한 100억쯤 물려있겠네 7월의 실수는 주말간 좀 쉬니까 쓸만해서 작성중. 거의 끝나가는데 아무래도 오늘 올리긴 힘들어서 내일 업로드할듯
❤5
그리고 제가 ㅈ밥이긴 하지만 다음주 월 개장할 때 하이닉스 하락 시작하면 주울만하지 않나 싶긴 혀요.(가격이 궁금하면 비봉이나 디젠님이나 낭랑화님이나 그런 고수님께 물으시고...) 되돌림 최소 210만원은 어차피 무조건 올텐데 단기 올지 중기(2-3개월) 올지 차이니....(물론 전고돌 못한다는 건 아니고 최소 되돌림유) 전 약간 요새 투자할 시간이 없어서 멀리서 보니 좀 그냥 객관적으로 그런 생각이 들긴 합니다
❤10
그리고 비트는 여기서 8월봉을 횡보로 마감하면 모르겠지만, 그게 아니라면 신저갱 혹은 저점 더블바텀은 반드시 거쳐야하는게 맞는 거라 생각함. 10월 전 8월 중순을 저점 보고있긴 했지만, 저점에 대해 감히 그렇게 예상하는 것보다는 매주 하루살이마냥 생각해야되는 게 맞다고 봄. 66 안착 못하니 내려앉은 건 다들 보다시피...흑
❤14
마스코인 살 바에는 밈즈 사는게 맞지 아늠...?
custom 54225387353947663524
무조건 알파 만 사셈. 바낸알파 말하는 게 아니고, 그냥 돈이 몰리는 알파. 재킷보다는 마스코인인거임
🔥7❤1
불굴의 의지로🔥 pinned «보니깐 븐밈들 사고 한 번 칠거 같은데 창펑햄이 밈좀 산다고 하는데, 절대 플랩거만 사진 않을거임. 플랩 하나, 포밈 하나 살거라 생각하고 포밈 중에선 알파인 거 살거라 생각듦. 알파 중에선 선물 상장 안된거 살거라 생각하고 그걸 마스코인 키높이기 시킨 다음 같이 살 가능성 높다 봄. 플랩꺼는 창펑햄이 살 게 $marscoin 말고 없긴함;;;»
보니깐 븐밈들 사고 한 번 칠거 같은데 창펑햄이 밈좀 산다고 하는데, 절대 플랩거만 사진 않을거임. 플랩 하나, 포밈 하나 살거라 생각하고 포밈 중에선 알파인 거 살거라 생각듦. 알파 중에선 선물 상장 안된거 살거라 생각하고 그걸 마스코인 키높이기 시킨 다음 같이 살 가능성 높다 봄. 플랩꺼는 창펑햄이 살 게 $marscoin 말고 없긴함;;;
❤7
66에 대해선 몹시 동의
❤10
이번주 관전포인트 매우 심플. 1) 비트코스 주봉마감 66위에서 하는가만 보면 됨. 더 나아가 월봉마감도 66 위에서 하는지 보면 될 듯함, 담주까지. 2) 알트 굳이 싶음. 손익비 안 좋음. 66안착 후 보던말던 해도 될 듯함.
❤🔥13❤3🔥1
그리고 전 연우님과 직접적 친분은 없지만 채팅방에서 이야기하면서 많은 말들을 나눴는데 이번에 캐시캣 투자 건으로 큰 돈을 버셨다 들었을 때 진심으로 축하했고 저에 대한 기대감이 커졌고, 이 사람이 이 부를 이루기 전에 소통했던 게 너무 값지다 생각했습니다. 결국 내가 소통했던 사람이 부를 이룬 게 그 사람이 잘된 거에 대해 배아플게 아니라 1. 난 이 사람과 관계를 맺었던 과거가 오히려 더 값진게 되는 것이고, 그 사람의 가치가 더 대단해짐으로써 저도 돈을 벌게 되는거라는 생각이 듭니다. 표현이 좀 이상하지만요;;;; 저는 감사하게도 연우님이 저를 예전에 팔로우해주시는데 이번에 연우님 체급이 커지니 저도 기분이 너무 좋더라구요?! 세상의 인정을 받는 사람에게 인정받은 느낌이 들어서요...!!! 2. 그 성공한 사람은 나와의 과거를 토대로…
❤32🔥5💩3
인생의 진리를 꿰뚫는 말이라 생각합니다. 밈코인 뿐 아니라 모든 자산 영역에서요. 읽어보심 좋을 듯 합니다.
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @effort_never_betrays_U. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“불굴의 의지로🔥” (@effort_never_betrays_U), 2,183 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/effort_never_betrays_U.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.