Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 10 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 23 of the 23 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 262 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 93 days, net -51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,865–7,968 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 23:50
7,905
-5
5 Nov 2026, 22:45
7,910
-4
3 Nov 2026, 03:07
7,914
-1
28 Oct 2026, 03:09
7,915
+11
24 Oct 2026, 23:56
7,904
-3
22 Oct 2026, 02:56
7,907
-4
19 Oct 2026, 02:27
7,911
-5
16 Oct 2026, 04:37
7,916
-3
12 Oct 2026, 19:37
7,919
-2
29 Sept 2026, 07:37
7,921
+44
19 Sept 2026, 01:00
7,877
-7
14 Sept 2026, 12:38
7,884
-5
11 Sept 2026, 05:20
7,889
-8
6 Sept 2026, 05:15
7,897
-5
2 Sept 2026, 01:09
7,902
-1
29 Aug 2026, 23:14
7,903
-2
27 Aug 2026, 05:42
7,905
-10
24 Aug 2026, 07:38
7,915
-9
21 Aug 2026, 01:14
7,924
-8
17 Aug 2026, 18:05
7,932
first reading
Engagement
332 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.37%
avg views ÷ 7,905 subscribers
Avg views / post
345
149 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
149
of 332 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 146 of 149 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
332 (6 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
51,457
Reactions total
1,320
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 01:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈16,300
Videos
≈13,500
Links
≈334
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 22m
Average length
1m 49s
Measured directly from 112 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,303 reactions across 287 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
725
31.5%
👍
572
24.8%
❤
357
15.5%
😁
197
8.55%
🤣
94
4.08%
👏
76
3.30%
💔
71
3.08%
👌
62
2.69%
👎
50
2.17%
🔥
30
1.30%
🤮
26
1.13%
🤡
15
0.651%
🍌
7
0.304%
😢
6
0.261%
😭
5
0.217%
😨
3
0.13%
👀
2
0.087%
🙏
2
0.087%
🤔
2
0.087%
🤪
1
0.043%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 290 of the 332 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,303 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 332 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 39 of 149 posts held from the last 30 days (26.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
⭕️سفیدشویی روزنامه غربگرای سازندگی از مزدوران آمریکا در منطقه!
🔹درحالی که ترامپ بارها از جمله طی روزهای اخیر صراحتا اعلام کرده که حامیان منطقه ای آمریکا خواستار ادامه محاصره ایران هستند و حتی هزینه های حضور نظامی آمریکا در منطقه را فراهم کردند، با این حال روزنامه غربگرای سازندگی به سفیدشویی آنان مشغول است.
🆔@Armanirn
⭕️ولوله در اردوگاه حامیان قالیباف بخاطر سوءتفاهم اسلام آباد ادامه دارد / از سردبیر فرهیختگان تا اکبر گنجی همچنان در حال فحاشی به سعید جلیلی
🔹تک عبارت سوءتفاهم اسلام آباد به مثابه سیلی بود که تمام زرق و برق خودساخته تیم مذاکره کننده و حامیان آنها از مذاکرات اسلام آباد و نتیجه آن را با خود شست و برد.
🔹حجم عصبانیت حامیان قالیباف داخل و خارج نشین با گذشت ۴ روز نه تنها کاسته نشده بلکه شدت یافته است و پروژه بگیران اینست…
⭕️وقتی ساده انگاری تیم مذاکره کننده ایران در سوءتفاهم اسلام آباد برای سایر کشورها درس می شود
لاوروف:
🔹ما با توافق بر سر آتشبس دیگری، یا هرگونه توافقی که با هر نامی بخواهید آن را صدا کنید، بدون درک اینکه بعد از آن چه اتفاقی خواهد افتاد، موافقت نخواهیم کرد.
🔸رفتار عجیب تیم مذاکره کننده و قانع بودن به امضای ترامپ با اینکه سبب درس گرفتن کشورهای دیگر از جمله روسیه و یمن و ... شده و به آن بعنوان آیینه عبرت نگاه می کن…
⭕️حمایت روحالامینی نماینده وفاقی از بازداشت رسایی: راه دیگری جز زندان رفتن رسایی وجود نداشت!
🔹عبدالحسین روحالامینی از نمایندگان سوپروفاقی و حامی قالیباف از زندانی شدن همکار خود حمید رسایی دفاع کرد.
🔹 وی در گفتگو با سایت اصلاحطلب جماران در توجیه شکایت قالیباف از رسایی و زندانی شدن وی، گفت: "چند روز پیش از اجرای حکم، خودم به آقای رسایی پیشنهاد دادم شما از قالیباف عذرخواهی کنید، من واسطه میشوم تا موضوع فیصله پیدا…
⭕️ادعای شرکت البحری سعودی:
امروز، ۴ فروند کشتی متعلق به شرکت ما از تنگه هرمز عبور کردند. دولت عربستان سعودی در حال هماهنگی با آمریکا در مورد عبور کشتیهای ما از تنگه هرمز است.
🆔@Armanirn
⭕️ حق ماموریت روزانه ۱۳۰ دلاری مسئولان دولت پزشکیان/ دولت پزشکیان به نیروهای مسلح در مرزها روزانه ۷۰۰ هزار تومان حق ماموریت میدهد، اما به مدیرانش بابت سفر خارجی روزانه ۳۶ میلیون تومان
🔹 افشاگری محسن زنگنه رئیس کمیسیون ویژه حمایت از تولید مجلس: برای فردی که در جایگاه سازمانی سرتیپی قرار دارد، نه از نظر درجه نظامی، بلکه از نظر جایگاه خدمتی، حق مأموریت روزانه در مرزهای کشور تنها ۷۰۰ هزار تومان است؛ این در حالی است که…
⭕️رفتار خصمانه دولت الزیدی علیه ایران پس از دیپلماسی رئیس مجلس تشدید شد / دولت عراق مجوز پرواز تیم ملی ایران برای مسابقات بصره را صادر نکرد
🔹در حالی که حامیان قالیباف موج سنگین تبلیغاتی حول سفر الزیدی به ایران و دیپلماسی قالیباف راه انداختند، با این حال شواهد نشان می دهد رویکرد خصمانه دولت الزیدی علیه کشورمان پس از این دیدار تشدید شده است.
🔹در تازه ترین اقدام پس از بستن مرز سومار که امروز اتفاق افتاد ، خبر رسیده دو…
⭕️ چاک شومر، رهبر دموکراتها در مجلس سنای آمریکا: جنگ فاجعهباری که ترامپ علیه ایران به راه انداخت، به عنوان یکی از بزرگترین شکستهای سیاست خارجی در تاریخ ایالات متحده در یادها خواهد ماند
🔹شهروندان آمریکایی خواهان پایان دادن به این جنگ هستند؛ جنگی که هرگز خواستار آن نبودهاند و هر روز هزینههای سنگینی را به آنها تحمیل میکند.
🔹ادامهی این جنگ از سوی دونالد ترامپ و پیت هگست نمیتواند بیش از این تحقیرآمیز باشد.
🆔 …
⭕️ ثابتی: بعضیها نقشه کشیده بودند تا بعد از شهادت رهبر انقلاب، نقش "دلسی رودریگز" را بازی کنند و کشور را تقدیم امریکا کنند
🔹زنده ماندن آیتالله سید مجتبی خامنهای یک معجزه الهی بود تا کشور از دست نرود؛ البته که پشتوانه ایشان برای اداره کشور نیز خود شما مردم هستید و تا وقتی میادین پر از حضور مردم است جریان کودتا ناکام خواهد بود
🆔 @Armanirn
👍12
Showing the 12 most recent of 332 posts we hold for @armanirn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@armanirn edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 November 2026
Most recent edit
8 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
اقتصاد ۱۲۰ @Eghtesad120 · 55,893 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 24 August 2026
تهرانآنلاین ࡆ اخبارفوری جنگ ࡆ خبرفوری کرج @te_h6 · 212,157 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
عصر قانون ـ اخبار جنگ @AsrGhanoon · 22,407 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 October 2026
خبرگزاری دفاع مقدس @defapress_ir · 82,801 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
مجلس نیوز @Majlles_News · 22,022 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 September 2026
رفیق مدیا @rafighmedia · 34,577 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 August 2026
پایگاه خبری سراب نیوز @News_Sarab · 26,503 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 September 2026
ایران تایمز @irantimes_com · 388,698 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
اصولگرا نیوز 🇮🇷 @osoulgaranews · 20,323 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 September 2026
اخبارلحظه ای @akhbarelahzei_ir · 205,966 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
رصد اخبار | اخبار جنگ @Rasadeakhbaar · 20,271 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 September 2026
تاریخ پهلوی @tarikhe_paahlavi · 37,424 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
اخبار دکتر سعید جلیلی @jalili_saeed · 21,732 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026
انقلابی نیوز @enghllabi · 23,686 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 September 2026
روزنامه وطن امروز @vatanemrooz · 16,326 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 5 September 2026
توییتر مقاومت @twitter_Quds · 45,725 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
خبر فوری جنگ ایران @irzagrosnews · 1,132,608 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 August 2026
سلام آنلاین @salamonlline · 53,932 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 19 August 2026
ایران اقتصادی | اخبار مهم @iran_eghtesadi · 135,928 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
حمید رسایی @rasaee · 22,746 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 September 2026
اخبار جنگ / خبر یک خطی @khabar1khatti1400 · 327,944 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
اخبار فوری و محرمانه @MohemFoori · 93,703 Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
روزپلاس @roozplus_ir · 202,696 Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
خبر ۲۴ @bisto4news · 55,294 Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آرمان ایران” (@armanirn), 7,905 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/armanirn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.