Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лекции Умара Абу ль-Хасана

Channel

Лекции Умара Абу ль-Хасана

@umarabulhasan

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,465subscribers

+79 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001364349467
TypeChannel
Username@umarabulhasan
DescriptionКанал для распространения знаний и акыды ахлю сунна ва ль-джамаа. Бот с уроками: @UmarAbulHasanbot
Created8 May 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/umarabulhasan

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,3836,4736,4286 August 2026 — 6,386 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,386 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,383 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,385 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,389 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,391 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,400 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,404 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,399 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,413 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,404 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,393 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,385 subscribers27 September 2026 — 6,389 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,385 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,402 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,442 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,450 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,462 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,465 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,473 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,470 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,472 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,459 subscribers8 November 2026 — 6,465 subscribers6,4656 August 20268 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 95 days, net +79. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,370–6,487 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 22:506,465+6
5 Nov 2026, 09:466,459-13
2 Nov 2026, 10:416,472+2
30 Oct 2026, 14:576,470-3
27 Oct 2026, 07:276,473+8
24 Oct 2026, 10:206,465+3
21 Oct 2026, 01:086,462+12
17 Oct 2026, 21:296,450+8
15 Oct 2026, 08:086,442+40
11 Oct 2026, 20:396,402+17
5 Oct 2026, 06:016,385-4
27 Sept 2026, 02:416,389+4
15 Sept 2026, 17:206,385-8
12 Sept 2026, 06:226,393-11
7 Sept 2026, 14:426,404-9
2 Sept 2026, 23:486,413+14
30 Aug 2026, 13:146,399-5
27 Aug 2026, 10:036,404+4
23 Aug 2026, 23:256,400+9
19 Aug 2026, 20:386,391first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.0%
avg views ÷ 6,465 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,940
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held40 (21 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total40,770
Reactions total1,097
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 17:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈342
Videos
≈229
Links
≈1,710

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 20s
Average length
1m 33s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,935 reactions across 40 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍54628.2%
❤53227.5%
💯37919.6%
🔥1568.06%
✍1125.79%
custom 5892991401251050633593.05%
❤‍🔥452.33%
⚡331.71%
🤝331.71%
👏80.413%
🥰80.413%
🕊60.31%
🤔60.31%
🎉50.258%
🏆40.207%
🤩20.103%
😍10.052%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,935 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
27
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 40 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @umarabulhasan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (47.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 13:07 UTC640 views25 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍18❤3💯3🕊1

4 Nov 2026, 11:07 UTC≈2,260 views112 reactions1 Starread 9 November 2026

Представляете, хушетскому, сидя в Англии и попивая чай с молоком можно поливать грязью шейха Хазими и очень многих других ученых, а всем остальным нельзя упомянуть то, что есть и обосновано фактами касательно Ульвана. Хушетскому можно порочить Ибн База, Люхейдана, Фавзана и многих ученых, поддерживавших короля Саудии и критиковавших тех, кто вел себя не как подобает саляфитам, но всем остальным нельзя. Только ульван…

❤40💯30🔥21✍7⚡3custom 58929914012510506333🎉2🏆2

3 Nov 2026, 20:22 UTC≈1,590 views71 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Вопрос Ульванитам: это дуа вбирает себя вашего шейха Тарифи? Ведь известно, что он считает короля Салмана законным правителем и также известно, что Сулейман аль-Ульван никогда не говорил о неверии короля Саудии, и это доказывается еще и тем, что он был выпущен из тюрьмы в Саудии, а тот, кто уличен в такфире короля из тюрьмы не выходит, как не вышел Худейр и Фахд, хоть даже открыто покаялись. Поэтому вопрос: просите л…

❤31🔥16custom 58929914012510506338⚡4✍4🥰3👍2💯2

3 Nov 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,470 views33 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

Истинный ислам в харакитском понимании Ульвана.

👍17❤7✍6⚡2🕊1

3 Nov 2026, 17:48 UTC≈1,370 views39 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Сегодня опять подтвердилось, что некоторые сторонники Ульвана не выносят такфир тем, кто считает иудеев и христиан мусульманами, потому что по их мнению - это цепной такфир. Вот и думайте потом, с кем мы имеем дело. И проблема у них в том, что это приводит к цепному такфиру. И все это под именем Ульвана. Затем они вопрошают: почему говорят об Ульване?

💯22🔥8❤6👍2custom 58929914012510506331

3 Nov 2026, 17:46 UTC≈1,340 views23 reactionsread 9 November 2026

https://youtu.be/buNvK7Ui4aU?is=IN2vPZfmRGvUZ-sy

custom 58929914012510506339🔥5❤4🤝3✍2

3 Nov 2026, 17:37 UTC≈1,320 views43 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Ульваниты даже не знают на чем их шейх, который утверждает разногласие в этом вопросе и который является далилем для них в утверждении приемлемого разногласия. Или они не знают, что говорит часть ульванитов. Поэтому он и был упомянут, никто ему не приписывал мнение, что он сам не считает это большим ширком. Но его сторонники считают, что Ульван раз сказал разногласие, значит, разногласие. Этот суфийский фанатизм и до…

👍22✍9❤9❤‍🔥3

3 Nov 2026, 17:22 UTC≈1,260 views62 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Ps. Эти люди до сих пор не вышли из своей «войны» с теми кого они называют «джамитами» и в которых не затрагивается ни один вопрос акыды, а борьба идет вокруг тех или иных склок за единственным исключением вопрос суда не по закону Аллаха. Во всех остальных случаях «ихваны» и те, кто их опровергает не затрагивают ни одного вопроса акыды. Потому что они не отличаются в этом друг от друга. Тут же мы конкретно указываем …

🔥29💯12✍9❤5custom 58929914012510506333⚡2🏆1👍1

3 Nov 2026, 17:12 UTC≈1,310 views81 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

В ответ на моё видео про дружбу Ульвана и главного ихвана Саудии Салмана аль-Авды, проблемы Ульвана со стороны манхаджа и вопросов акыды, «ихван» Хушетский приплел вообще сторонние вопросы, которые никак не обсуждались, отнес их к тому, кто и слово об этом не сказал и показал свое банкротство по обсуждаемым конкретным темам. При чем тут Салман, кто ему служит и все прочее? И при чем тут вообще события на Кавказе? Им …

👍47❤15💯14⚡3🎉1custom 58929914012510506331

3 Nov 2026, 12:02 UTC≈1,280 views34 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Поражает то, как о справедливом подходе поют люди, которые никогда к своим оппонентам справедливо не относились. Кто посеет ветер, тот пожнет бурю.

💯17👍9❤5✍3

3 Nov 2026, 11:59 UTC≈1,440 views29 reactionsread 9 November 2026

https://youtu.be/JNKG9AiDnFU?is=V0tXOD29oyiCBlrw Шейх Ибн Баз, да помилует его Аллах, говорит, что книги Сейида Кутба следует утилизировать. И что его «тафсир» тоже гиблый. Ни один человек, кроме закоренелого ихвана-кутбита, кем бы он ни был, не будет хвалить книги этого лицемера, после их прочтения. Затем, если даже человек прочитал и опровергает их, то это не говорит о том, что человек ихван, но если человек проч…

👍24❤5

30 Oct 2026, 18:04 UTC≈1,840 views61 reactions7 Starsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @tauhid_aVideo

Просьба шафаа у мертвых - большое многобожие единогласно https://t.me/umarabulhasan Умар абу ль-Хасан

💯38🤝13🔥10

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @umarabulhasan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Дагестан | Общество Дидо (Цунта)
@didozunta · 97
8 posts
__WANDERER07__
@wandereer07 · 18
8 posts
الفوائد الفقهية
@alfavdid · 1,629
7 posts
Дешархой
@desharkhoy · 313
4 posts
Не рабочий канал
@islam_dovodi_sestram · 1
4 posts
Rajab
@Rajab6 · 188
3 posts
Ислам . Манхадж саляфов . Акыда . Таухид .
@islamEdinobojie · 910
3 posts
سبيل النجاة
@sabeelnajah · 2,147
3 posts
سبيل السنة
@sabeelsunnah · 1,464
3 posts
TAQWA
@Taqwa_ilm · 7,818
2 posts
𝑷𝒓𝒐 𝑰𝒔𝒍𝒂𝒎
@Vse_Pro_Islam_I · 6,902
2 posts
الـدعـوة الـسـلـفـيـة
@addauatussalafiya · 519
2 posts
прямой путь отличился
@pentiuum04 · 370
2 posts
TAUHID_
@tauhid_a · 1,264
2 posts
ا
@tauuuhid · 5
2 posts
SUNNA
@Ask_Islam_Nasiha · 4,823
1 post
ИДУЩИЕ К АЛЛАХУ
@Chujdaya_Dusha_lslama · 3,505
1 post
Намаз
@Islam_namaz · 310
1 post
✨ Quran || Sunna
@Quranisunn · 2,499
1 post
Из уст в уста | Абу Зейд
@aby_zeud · 1,657
1 post
Саляфитский призыв словами имамов Неджда
@aimmatunejd · 3,534
1 post
الفرقة الناجية
@alfirqatunajiia · 331
1 post
САЛАФИЯ ✒️
@alsalyafiya · 437
1 post
БЛЕСК ЕДИНОБОЖИЯ
@bles_sokrovisha · 3,019
1 post
Студент
@ctydent_1 · 3,923
1 post
Фетвы шейха Абдуль-Азиза ибн База
@fatava_bnbaz · 455
1 post
АЯТЫ И ХАДИСЫ
@hadisiayati · 7,486
1 post
Путь Спасения | طريق النجاة
@imams_of_sunnah · 2,124
1 post
ОСНОВЫ ИСЛАМА ✒️
@islam_osnovi · 3,781
1 post
🏳️ حق
@islamski_e · 3,573
1 post
el hadid
@miramir14 · 23
1 post
Reminder
@napominanieizimana · 5,674
1 post
العلم نور
@noterpu · 82
1 post
ОСНОВЫ СУННЫ 🏹
@osnovisunni · 3,210
1 post
Ⲡⲟⲗⲉⳅⲏⲟ
@poleezno · 3,062
1 post
просто пользы
@riyaduumm · 617
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Умма «Читай»
@ummah_chitay · 20,965
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 September 2026
Saudia Press © Новости КСА
@SaudiaPress · 20,048
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 September 2026
Институт «Дироя» | معهد الدراية
@Diroya · 49,849
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лекции Умара Абу ль-Хасана” (@umarabulhasan), 6,465 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/umarabulhasan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.