Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +608. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 296,217–297,220 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 10:33
297,104
+113
11 Aug 2026, 13:02
296,991
+409
10 Aug 2026, 09:27
296,582
+191
9 Aug 2026, 10:51
296,391
+51
8 Aug 2026, 12:32
296,340
+7
7 Aug 2026, 11:17
296,333
-65
6 Aug 2026, 12:40
296,398
-98
6 Aug 2026, 03:22
296,496
first reading
Engagement
158 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.3%
avg views ÷ 297,104 subscribers
Avg views / post
69,200
158 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.625%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
158
of 158 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
158 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
10,935,370
Reactions total
68,385
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈26,600
Videos
≈13,200
Links
≈37,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
10m 12s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
62,060 reactions across 138 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
27,008
43.5%
❤
13,329
21.5%
😢
11,246
18.1%
🤣
5,738
9.25%
👍
3,591
5.79%
🔥
1,148
1.85%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 158 of the 158 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68,385reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 158 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
10.8%
17 of 158 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
71,800
over 17 measured posts
Median views · rest
71,900
over 141 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 158 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🤡 Після обходу Ямщикової на перехресті Європейської/Шевченка майже нічого не змінилося.
Комунальники прибрали оголошення зі стічної труби та зрізали дорожній знак. У результаті залишили голий стовп, схожий на хрест.
А от вибоїни, напливи асфальту та занедбані паркани – на місці. Поруч обласна лікарня, але про зручний наземний перехід для пацієнтів, яким важко долати підземку, схоже, ніхто не подумав.
ㅤ
Труха⚡️Полта…
🔥 Хочете додати нових емоцій та яскравих вражень у ваше особисте життя?
Love Story SexShop — це великий вибір якісних товарів для дорослих, які допоможуть урізноманітнити ваші романтичні моменти 🩷
У каталозі:
🔹 Вібратори та фалоімітатори
🔸 Анальні іграшки та BDSM-аксесуари
🔹 Еротична білизна
🔸 Збуджуючі гелі, рідкі вібратори, пролонгатори та багато іншого
✅ Ми гарантуємо нашим клієнтам повну анонімність та швидку …
Квартиру за $700 000 продають в Полтаві😳
5-кімнатні апартаменти на межі Колонії та Павленків. За ці гроші можна було б взяти елітне житло десь біля моря.
ㅤ
Труха⚡️Полтава | Надіслати новину
🛒 «Розстрочка 0% без переплат!»
Звучить як подарунок?
Спойлер: за все платиш ти. Відсотки банку вже зашиті в ціну товару.
А тепер поглянь інакше 👇
Купив телефон Apple у розстрочку.
А міг за ті ж гроші купити акції Apple.
Той самий бренд. Дві долі грошей.
Телефон за рік дешевшає вдвічі.
Акції - зростають разом із компанією.
«В пошуках ліквідності» - канал, де гроші перестають бути витратами і стають інструментом.…
💥Бойову частину ракети знешкодили на Полтавщині, – поліція.
Після чергової атаки рф виявили нерозірвану частину ворожої ракети. Вибухотехніки перемістили її на спецмайданчик для підриву.
Труха⚡️Полтава | Надіслати новину
👍249❤46🤣14
Showing the 12 most recent of 158 posts we hold for @truexapoltava. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@truexapoltava edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 158 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 321,923 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@truexapoltava named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@robotaua named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ПОЛТАВА НОВИНИ | СИРЕНА @region_poltava_syrena · 195,507 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
Труха⚡️Харків | Новини @truexakharkiv · 576,666 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 August 2026
Карта повітряних тривог 🇺🇦 @alarmua · 931,070 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Харьков life | Харків 🇺🇦 @kharkivlife · 672,193 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 August 2026
Карта повітряних тривог ‼️ Вибухи ‼️ Ракети ‼️ @povitryanatrivogaaa · 714,082 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
Де Ракета ?🚀 | Моніторинг @deraketaua · 154,075 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
Труха⚡️Україна @truexanewsua · 3,167,312 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 August 2026
Труха⚡️Кропивницький @truexakropivnicky · 174,361 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
ХС | Харків 🇺🇦 Харьков @hs_kharkiv · 180,998 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
Труха⚡️Черкаси @truexacherkasi · 168,090 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
Труха⚡️Одеса | Новини @odesatruexa · 250,155 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
Труха⚡️Київ @truexakyiv · 887,648 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
13 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Труха⚡️Полтава” (@truexapoltava), 297,104 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/truexapoltava.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
