Channel
@ihor_terekhov
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
152,936subscribers
+448 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001192400813 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ihor_terekhov |
| Created | 30 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ihor_terekhov |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
144,000 average views per post against 152,936 subscribers — an engagement rate of 94.0%. Across the 6,562 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,004–316,057 subscribers — the middle half sit between 2.20% and 14.3%, with a median of 6.07%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 44 of 44 published in the window (0 exact, 44 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 6,327,900 |
| Mature posts only | 96.6% over 42 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 152,936 measured 12 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b100000 · 6,562 channels · p10 0.73% · p25 2.20% · p50 6.07% · p75 14.3% · p90 27.4% |
| Position in cohort | 99.817th percentile · 15.5× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.191% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Ukrainian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 152,936 | +17 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 152,919 | +12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 152,907 | +109 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 152,798 | +349 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 152,449 | +7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 152,442 | -28 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 152,470 | -18 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 152,488 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 152,488 | first reading |
44 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 44 (1 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,327,900 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Сьогодні українські родини дедалі частіше рахують не покупки, а відмови від них. Цього тижня обійдемося без м’яса. Ліки купимо після зарплати. Нове взуття дитині наступного місяця. Вибір між їжею, лікуванням і комунальними рахунками став буденністю. Найстрашніше, що до бідності починають звикати. За оцінкою Світового банку, у 2025 році за межею бідності жили 41,6% українців. У 2021 році таких було 20%. За чотири рок…
Два дні тому ми запустили в застосунку «Open Kharkiv» новий транспортний сервіс. Тепер у режимі реального часу харківʼяни бачать на карті рух автобусів, тролейбусів і трамваїв, перевіряють маршрути та графіки. У цьому ж розділі - розклад метрополітену й зупинки-укриття. У сьогоднішньому Харкові зручність нерозривно пов’язана з безпекою. Коли ви плануєте поїздку на роботу, навчання чи у справах, важливо одразу розум…
Вибух, що було чутно у Харкові, за попередньою інформацією, пролунав у близькому передмісті.
Уже чотири з половиною роки ми живемо в умовах, де дуже часто немає готових рішень. Багато чого доводиться створювати, перевіряти й змінювати просто «з коліс» - ціною надзвичайних зусиль і, на жаль, людських життів. І дай Боже, щоб наступним поколінням ніколи не довелося проходити через те, що змусило нас усього цього навчитися. Та навіть у часи війни не можна втрачати головного - люди мають бачити своє майбутнє ту…
Традиційно підбиваємо підсумки минулого тижня. За сім днів росіяни атакували Харків 11 разів. Найчастіше били «Бандероллю» - маємо сім таких ударів. Також ворог застосовував реактивні «Італмаси», FPV-дрони, «Ланцети», у місті падали уламки «Шахедів». Під вогнем були п’ять районів: Новобаварський, Холодногірський, Салтівський, Київський та Індустріальний. Пошкоджені житлові будинки, об’єкти бізнесу, газові та електр…
Надійшла інформація про ворожий удар по Немишлянському району.
Також у Холодногірському районі зафіксовано приліт ворожого дрону.
Ще один удар зафіксовано по Київському району.
Ворог завдав удару по Слобідському району - наслідки уточнюємо.
За уточненою інформацією - під ударом опинився Індустріальний район
Ще одне влучання зафіксовано у промзоні Немишлянського району.
Влучання ворожого дрону у Салтівському районі по обʼєкту інфраструктури.
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @ihor_terekhov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 5,529 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Ihor Terekhov |
|---|---|
| Description | Acting mayor of Kharkhiv, Ukraine |
| YouTube | UCKGJX5poNiOurrhxASI9NIg |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ігор Терехов” (@ihor_terekhov), 152,936 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ihor_terekhov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.