Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for جرائم الجهمية

Channel

جرائم الجهمية

@Jra2mAljahmya

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

826subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002193730661
TypeChannel
Username@Jra2mAljahmya
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Jra2mAljahmya

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

81882682210 August 2026 — 818 subscribers11 August 2026 — 820 subscribers17 August 2026 — 821 subscribers25 August 2026 — 819 subscribers1 September 2026 — 821 subscribers18 September 2026 — 826 subscribers10 August 202618 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 40 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 817–827 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 22:41826+5
1 Sept 2026, 12:08821+2
25 Aug 2026, 10:44819-2
17 Aug 2026, 15:14821+1
11 Aug 2026, 04:55820+2
10 Aug 2026, 05:01818first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 29 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

127 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5341.7%
🔥4333.9%
❤‍🔥97.09%
🤣75.51%
32.36%
🍓32.36%
💔32.36%
😡21.57%
😱21.57%
😐10.787%
🤬10.787%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2025 to 29 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Mar 2025, 16:12 UTC≈13,900 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @MSALBANI

عيد مبارك علينا وعليكم وعلى أمة المسلمين جميعا، وتقبل الله منا ومنكم الصيام والقيام ورزقنا نعمة النظر لوجهه الكريم يوم القيامة. وأعاد الله علينا هذا الشهر الفضيل ونحن قابضون على السنة لا نحابي فيها أحدا ولا نرتخي في نصرتها ولو كان الثمن عظيما. — أخوكم أبو عبد الأعلى محمد بن سيد السلافي الإيليري الأرناؤوطي الألباني الحنبلي

👍5🍓3

10 Mar 2025, 17:58 UTC≈14,700 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sunnay6626

🟥 أسلاف الجهمية https://t.me/Jamis_Predecessors

🔥5😡1

2 Feb 2025, 17:47 UTC≈14,800 views39 reactionsread 10 August 2026

الجهمية الكفار الذين يضعون تعبيرات الضحك. كنت اتمنى رؤية هذه الجرأة في زمن الشريف أبي جعفر وهو يستتيب إمامكم الشيرازي الذي استعمل التقية ونافق وتبرأ من أصحابه، وفي زمن محمد بن سبكتكين الغزنوي وهو يقتل إمامكم ابن فورك، أو إمامكم الباقلاني الذي كان يخرج متبرقعا خوفا من أبي حامد الإسفراييني لعنة الله عليهم، وعليكم.

👍21❤‍🔥9🔥72

30 Jan 2025, 14:39 UTC≈13,800 views46 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

من الجامع الأموي وهذه هى البداية يا معشر الجهمية

🔥31👍8🤣4🤬1😐1😱1

29 Jan 2025, 19:10 UTC≈7,390 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

===== الصور بجودة عالية =====

👍1

29 Jan 2025, 19:10 UTC≈10,700 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

جريمة الأشعرية في حق شهاب الدين ابن مري الشافعي ❐ أولا:『التعريف به』 شهاب الدين، أحمد بن محمد بن محمود بن إسماعيل بن مري البعلبكي الشافعي. تفقه على مذهب الإمام أبي عبد الله محمد بن إدريس الشافعي. والتقى بشيخ الإسلام أبي العباس أحمد بن عبد الحليم بن تيمية الحراني؛ في الديار المصرية عندما نفي الشيخ إلى هناك. له رسالة في توحيد العبادة (عُثر على مخطوطها) وله سؤال لشيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية في علو الباري جل جلاله. وأُذي ف

👍71

29 Jan 2025, 19:10 UTC≈14,000 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ملخص جريمة الأشعرية في حق شهاب الدين ابن مري الشافعي ❐ سار ابن مري على طريقة ابن تيمية في الإنكار على المستغيثين بغير الله (بالنبي —صلى الله عليه وسلم— وغيره). ❐ قام عليه الصوفية الأشعرية بسبب ما قاله في أمر الإستغاثة بالنبي —صلى الله عليه وسلم— وعلى رأسهم قاضي المالكية: «محمد بن أبي بكر الأخنائي —الذي رد عليه ابن تيمية—». ❐ أمر الإخنائي بسجنه، ثم منعه من الجلوس على المنبر في مصر. ❐ قام عليه الأخنائي وضربه خمسين جل

👍11💔3🤣3😡1😱1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @Jra2mAljahmya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“جرائم الجهمية” (@Jra2mAljahmya), 826 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Jra2mAljahmya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.