Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 4 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 7 of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 35 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @galeriSC. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net -265. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,975–28,320 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 23:40
28,015
-11
16 Sept 2026, 16:20
28,026
-2
14 Sept 2026, 17:36
28,028
-8
13 Sept 2026, 01:21
28,036
-10
11 Sept 2026, 05:19
28,046
-18
8 Sept 2026, 06:39
28,064
-13
4 Sept 2026, 22:22
28,077
-3
3 Sept 2026, 09:22
28,080
-8
2 Sept 2026, 03:17
28,088
-7
1 Sept 2026, 06:13
28,095
-7
31 Aug 2026, 05:25
28,102
-15
30 Aug 2026, 07:16
28,117
-2
29 Aug 2026, 04:58
28,119
+1
28 Aug 2026, 02:24
28,118
+1
27 Aug 2026, 04:38
28,117
-2
26 Aug 2026, 05:04
28,119
-14
25 Aug 2026, 03:36
28,133
-15
23 Aug 2026, 22:54
28,148
-12
22 Aug 2026, 07:38
28,160
-10
20 Aug 2026, 20:22
28,170
first reading
Engagement
273 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.09%
avg views ÷ 28,015 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,150
119 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
119
of 273 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
273 (3 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
136,392
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 23:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈9,650
Videos
≈194
Links
≈28,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 15s
Average length
1m 45s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🌕🌙🔛 FAEDAH MALAM
✓ Petikan Akhlak Salafus Shalih
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
💫 ANTUSIAS SHAHABAT TERHADAP ALLAH TA'ALA DAN RASUL-NYA
📜 Urwah bin Az Zubair bin Al Awwam رضي اللّه عنهما berkata :
Aisyah رضي الله عنها berkata kepadaku :
"Kedua orangtuamu -demi Allah- adalah termasuk orang-orang yang tanggap merespon Allah Ta'ala dan Rasul-Nya setelah mereka ditimpa kesulitan".
📚 [Ibnu Sa'ad Fit…
🌟 Mutiara Ayat Suci Alquran
🔥🔥🔥 JANGANLAH BERBUAT SYIRIK! KARENA SYIRIK ADALAH KEZALIMAN TERBESAR
✍️ Allah subhanallahu wa ta'ala berfirman:
وَإِذْ قَالَ لُقْمَٰنُ لِٱبْنِهِۦ وَهُوَ يَعِظُهُۥ يَٰبُنَىَّ لَا تُشْرِكْ بِٱللَّهِ ۖ إِنَّ ٱلشِّرْكَ لَظُلْمٌ عَظِيمٌ
‼️ Dan (ingatlah) saat Lukman Al Hakim berkata kepada anaknya, ketika dia memberi nasehat kepadanya,
”Wahai anakku! Janganlah engkau mempersekutukan Allah…
•••﷽•••
📚 INFO KAJIAN MASJID ASY-SYAFI'I BAYASUT CIREBON
▫️▫️▫️
In syaa Allah
🎙 Pemateri:
Al-Ustadz Muhammad Umar As-Sewed حفظه الله
📖 Pembahasan:
Syarh Aqidatis-Salaf Ashhabil Hadits Lisy-Syaikh Rabi' Al-Madkhali رحمه الله
▫️▫️▫️
Saluran Telegram Radio Indah Siar: https://t.me/radioindahsiar
Saluran WhatsApp Radio Indah Siar: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb651gxGehELaLLDLO0D
🔰𝗠𝗘𝗠𝗢𝗛𝗢𝗡 𝗔𝗠𝗣𝗨𝗡𝗔𝗡 𝗨𝗡𝗧𝗨𝗞 𝗠𝗔𝗬𝗬𝗜𝗧
-----------------
Dari Abu Hurairah, dia berkata: Nabi mengumumkan kepada kami berita kematian Al-Najasyi, penguasa negeri Habasyah pada hari kematiannya, lalu beliau bersabda:
"Mohonkanlah ampun untuk saudara kalian".
عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ قَالَ: نَعَى لَنَا رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ النَّجَاشِيَّ صَاحِبَ الْحَبَشَةِ يَوْمَ الَّذِي مَاتَ…
🌕🔛🌙 FAEDAH MALAM
✓ Petikan Akhlak Salaf
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
🛏️ QOILULAH (TIDUR SIANG) DI MASJID
📜 Al Hasan Al Bashri رحمَـہ الله تَعـَالَـى berkata :
"Aku melihat Utsman bin Affan رضي اللّه عنه qoilulah (tidur siang) di dalam masjid, dalam kondisi beliau sebagai seorang Khalifah (penguasa).
Lalu beliau bangun, dalam keadaan ada bekas kerikil di perutnya.
Maka dikatakan : "Ini beliau seo…
••┈┈✺ ﷽ ✺┈┈••
📚 INFO KAJIAN PONPES DHIYA'US SUNNAH CIREBON
▫️▫️▫️
In syaa Allah
🎙 Pemateri:
Al-Ustadz Muhammad Umar As-Sewed حفظه الله
📖 Pembahasan:
Taisirul-Karimir-Rahman Fii Tafsiri Kalamil-Mannan Lisy-Syaikh 'Abdurrahman As-Sa'di رحمه الله
▫️▫️▫️
Saluran Telegram Radio Indah Siar: https://t.me/radioindahsiar
Saluran WhatsApp Radio Indah Siar: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb651gxGehELaLLDLO0D
🔰𝗞𝗘𝗨𝗧𝗔𝗠𝗔𝗔𝗡 𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗚𝗨𝗥𝗨𝗦 𝗝𝗘𝗡𝗔𝗭𝗔𝗛
-----------------
Dari Abu Hurairah, dia berkata: Rasulullah bersabda :
"Barang siapa yang menyaksikan jenazah hingga ikut men𝘀𝗵alatkannya maka baginya pahala satu qirath, dan barang siapa yang menyaksikan jenazah hingga ikut menguburkannya maka baginya pahala dua 𝗾𝗶𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗵".
Ditanyakan kepada beliau:
"Apa yang dimaksud dengan dua qirath?"
Beliau menjawab:
"Seperti dua gunung yang 𝗯𝗲𝘀𝗮…
📆 𝗞𝗔𝗟𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗘𝗥 𝗛𝗜𝗝𝗥𝗜𝗬𝗔𝗛
🗒️ Senin, 9 Rabiutsani 1448 H.
🗒️ 21 September 2026 M.
📲⏩ Ayo Gabung dan Bagikan :
https://t.me/salafy_cirebon
Showing the 12 most recent of 273 posts we hold for @salafy_cirebon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🌹SyarhusSunnahLinNisaa`🌹 @syarhussunnahlinnisa · 24,020 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
Nisaa` As-Sunnah @NisaaAssunnah · 22,860 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 September 2026
Salafy Indonesia @forumsalafy · 57,167 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
SyababSalafy️ @syababsalafy · 22,909 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
Manhaj Salaf @Manhaj_salaf1 · 34,269 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SALAFY CIREBON 🇮🇩” (@salafy_cirebon), 28,015 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salafy_cirebon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.