Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

FAWAID SOLO

@fawaidsolo

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,742subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001007218583
TypeChannel
Username@fawaidsolo
Description📚📡Menebar Fawaid Ilmiah Diatas Pemahaman Salaful Ummah https://t.me/fawaidsolo Pembina: al Ustadz Abul Faruq Ayip Syafruddin hafizhahullah 📮Email: abufarras125@gmail.com
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fawaidsolo

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@salafytabalong/103702 Aug 2026, 01:18 UTC@fawaidsolo/29021 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC1.0010 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@salafytabalong5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0010 hours@salafytabalong (50)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 27 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @salafytabalong. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

11,74111,75711,7496 August 2026 — 11,757 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,757 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,755 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,752 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,751 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,744 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,741 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,742 subscribers11,7426 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,739–11,759 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:1811,742+1
11 Aug 2026, 08:1511,741-3
10 Aug 2026, 06:4311,744-7
9 Aug 2026, 05:5111,751-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:3711,752-3
7 Aug 2026, 08:4511,755-2
6 Aug 2026, 06:3111,757no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:4811,757first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.92%
avg views ÷ 11,742 subscribers
Avg views / post
578
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
51
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held51 (2 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total28,879
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,280
Videos
400
Links
17,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
48s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 05:37 UTC271 viewsread 12 August 2026

BETAPA RUGINYA HATI YANG JAUH DARI AL-QUR’AN ======== Syaikh Abdus Salam as-Suhaimi hafizhahullah berkata, "Duhai betapa meruginya ketika Kitab Allah begitu dekat dengan kita, tetapi hati justru jauh darinya! Tadabbur Al-Qur’an adalah sebuah nikmat yang agung. Tidak ada yang benar-benar mengetahui nilainya kecuali orang yang kehilangan nikmat tersebut. Jadi tujuan membaca Al-Qur’an bukanlah sekadar agar mata melew

12 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC257 viewsread 12 August 2026

قال الشيخ عبد السلام السحيمي حفظه الله: يَا لَهَا مِنْ خَسَارَةٍ أَنْ يَكُونَ كِتَابُ اللهِ قَرِيبًا مِنَّا، ثُمَّ يَكُونَ الْقَلْبُ بَعِيدًا عَنْهُ! تَدَبُّرُ الْقُرْآنِ نِعْمَةٌ عَظِيمَةٌ، لَا يَعْرِفُ قَدْرَهَا حَقًّا مَنْ حُرِمَهَا؛ فَلَيْسَ الْمَقْصُودُ أَنْ تَمُرَّ الْعَيْنُ عَلَى الْآيَاتِ فَحَسْبُ، وَإِنَّمَا أَنْ يَقِفَ الْقَلْبُ عِنْدَ هِدَايَاتِهَا، وَيَتَأَمَّلَ مَوَاعِظَهَا، وَيَتَأَثَّرَ بِوَعْدِهَا و

11 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC372 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @kliksehatplusVideo

🌴KEUTAMAAN MEMBIASAKAN MELAKUKAN SEBUAH AMAL KETIKA SEHAT DAN LAPANG 🎙️ Syaikh Muhammad bin Shalih al-Utsaimin rahimahullah Sepantasnya bagi orang yang berakal selama dia dalam keadaan sehat dan longgar untuk semangat melakukan amal shalih, sehingga ketika dia tidak mampu melakukannya karena sakit atau kesibukan, tetap dicatat untuknya dengan sempurna. Maka manfaatkan kesehatan dan manfaatkan waktu luang untuk ber

11 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC349 viewsread 12 August 2026

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم ┏📡📚 29 Safar 1448 H RABU, 12 Agustus 2026 FAWAID SOLO 📚📡 Menebar Fawaid Ilmiah Diatas Pemahaman Salaful Ummah https://t.me/fawaidsolo https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaExOnYKLaHrlawpdK3t 📚📡┛

11 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC428 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @salafytabalong

APAKAH ORANG YANG MASUK MAJELIS YANG BERISI KEMUNGKARAN CUKUP MENGINGKARINYA DENGAN HATINYA? 🎙️ Mufti Kerajaan Arab Saudi, Syaikh Dr. Shalih bin Fauzan al-Fauzan hafizhahullah Pertanyaan: Jika saya masuk ke sebuah majelis lalu saya mendapati di dalamnya terdapat kemungkaran, apakah saya cukup mengingkarinya dengan hati, ataukah saya harus keluar dari majelis tersebut? Jawaban: Tidak. Tidak cukup mengingkari den

10 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC506 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

┏📡📚 BURUK SANGKA: CERMIN BURUKNYA ISI HATI https://t.me/fawaidsolo https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaExOnYKLaHrlawpdK3t 📚📡┛

10 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC482 viewsread 12 August 2026

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم ┏📡📚 28 Safar 1448 H SELASA, 11 Agustus 2026 FAWAID SOLO 📚📡 Menebar Fawaid Ilmiah Diatas Pemahaman Salaful Ummah https://t.me/fawaidsolo https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaExOnYKLaHrlawpdK3t 📚📡┛

10 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC585 viewsread 12 August 2026

APAKAH WANITA HARUS MENGERJAKAN SHALAT ZHUHUR DAN ASHAR JIKA DIA SUCI SEBELUM MATAHARI TENGGELAM? ======== 🎙️ Mufti Kerajaan Arab Saudi, Syaikh Dr. Shalih bin Fauzan al-Fauzan hafizhahullah Pertanyaan: Jika seorang wanita yang haid telah suci sebelum matahari terbenam, apakah dia wajib melaksanakan shalat Zhuhur sekaligus dengan shalat Ashar? Jawaban: Ya. Demikianlah yang dikatakan oleh para ulama: shalat yang s

10 Aug 2026, 02:40 UTC563 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @salafytabalong

INGATLAH ATAU LIHATLAH PENDERITAAN ORANG LAIN AGAR KITA BERSYUKUR, DAN SYUKUR ADALAH DENGAN MENTAATI ALLAH Imam Ibnu Katsir rahimahullah berkata, ثم دخلت سنة إحدى وثمانين ومائتين. فيها دخل المسلمون بلاد الروم فغنموا وسلموا. وفيها تكامل غور المياه ببلاد الري وطبرستان. وفيها غلت الأسعار جدا وجهد الناس حتى أكل بعضهم بعضا، وكان الرجل يأكل ابنه وابنته ف ﴿إِنّا لِلّهِ وَإِنّا إِلَيْهِ راجِعُونَ﴾ "Kemudian masuklah tahu

9 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC490 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @PONPES_ASSUNNAH_BATU

🌟🌟FITNAH SCROLL ✏️Bagian Pertama ▫️▫️▫️ 📱 Scroll yang Tampak Biasa, Mengapa Bisa Menjadi Fitnah? بِسْمِ اللّٰهِ الرَّحْمٰنِ الرَّحِيْمِ 🤲 Segala puji hanya milik Allah Ta'ala yang telah memberikan kepada kita nikmat iman, kesehatan, dan waktu. Shalawat serta salam semoga senantiasa tercurah kepada Nabi Muhammad ﷺ, keluarga, para sahabat, dan seluruh orang yang mengikuti petunjuk beliau hingga hari kiamat. ☝️ Di z

9 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC567 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

┏📡📚 DOA-DOA SAAT KESULITAN, SEDIH DAN GUNDAH https://t.me/fawaidsolo https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaExOnYKLaHrlawpdK3t 📚📡┛

9 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC548 viewsread 12 August 2026

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم ┏📡📚 27 Safar 1448 H SENIN, 10 Agustus 2026 FAWAID SOLO 📚📡 Menebar Fawaid Ilmiah Diatas Pemahaman Salaful Ummah https://t.me/fawaidsolo https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaExOnYKLaHrlawpdK3t 📚📡┛

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @fawaidsolo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 60,762 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FAWAID SOLO” (@fawaidsolo), 11,742 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fawaidsolo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.