Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Matan Minhaj

Channel

Matan Minhaj

@matanxminhaj

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,640subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001547037228
TypeChannel
Username@matanxminhaj
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 September 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/matanxminhaj

Growth

3,6403,6443,64210 September 2026 — 3,644 subscribers10 September 2026 — 3,644 subscribers12 September 2026 — 3,642 subscribers16 September 2026 — 3,640 subscribers10 September 202616 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,639–3,645 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 07:173,640-2
12 Sept 2026, 05:173,642-2
10 Sept 2026, 06:223,644no change
10 Sept 2026, 05:473,644first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.0%
avg views ÷ 3,640 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,020
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held20 (8 July 202626 August 2026)
Views total3,054
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Sept 2026, 06:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 04:25 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 10 September 2026
Forwarded from @abuhazim_faris

Kadang ada pelajaran berharga yang bisa kita ambil. Dalam perkara besar yang berpotensi menimbulkan fitnah di tengah Ahlus Sunnah, memang tidak ada kewajiban setiap orang harus melapor atau bermusyawarah kepada asatidzah senior sebelum mengadakan sebuah kegiatan. Namun, sikap kembali kepada para senior, meminta masukan, atau minimal mengetahui pandangan mereka, sering kali menjadi sebab tertutupnya pintu-pintu fitna

26 Aug 2026, 04:24 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 10 September 2026

🚧HANCURKAN TOPENG TAZALLUM KADZIB Bukannya tunduk kepada kebenaran dan bertaubat, ruju' ilal haq atas fitnah serta kekacauan yang telah ditimbulkannya, HARI AHADI justru terus menunjukkan sikap al-ishrar 'alal bathil. Ketika teguran ilmiah dan kehati-hatian para asatidzah serta penuntut ilmu mengemuka, langkah yang seharusnya ditempuh oleh seorang yang jujur adalah menghentikan kegaduhan, mengoreksi diri, dan merapa

27 Jul 2026, 01:41 UTC≈2,290 viewsread 10 September 2026
Forwarded from @sekelumitsejarahPhoto

LIK JAROT MEMBONGKAR KISAH DIBALIK LAYAR SEMINAR ONLINE, GAGAL MENCARI BEMPER Adab Jelek Panitia Setelah mereka membuat produk, disusunlah skenario menawarkan "produk buatannya" kepada salah satu Ma'had Asatidzah Senior dan menghubungi seorang ustadz kontributor Asy-Syariah agar menjadi pembuka produk mereka dan.... Gagal!! Demikianlah akhlaq jongkok kepada orang yang lebih tua di dalam dakwah. Tiada kata bermusyaw

25 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC≈2,630 viewsread 10 September 2026

⛔ MENYUMPAL MULUT PEMBELA HARI AHADI Inilah keputusasaan pembela hari ahadi akhir akhir ini.. Ketika kejahatan jejak digital Hari Ahadi dibongkar—bahwa ia berkelit enggan mentahdzir Rodja, MLM, dan membela hizbiyyin—mereka tidak sanggup menjawab setetes pun hujjahnya secara ilmiah. Lantas apa yang mereka lakukan? Mereka bersembunyi di balik nama Ustadz Muhammad Rijal, memamerkan poster kajian layaknya anak kecil yan

11 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC≈2,920 viewsread 10 September 2026
Forwarded from @sekelumitsejarahPhoto

WAHAI USTADZ HARI AHADI, MENSCROLL SEJARAH LALU MEMASANG TAZKIYAH TERHADAP AKIDAH RODJA (HALABIYAH IKHWANIYAH) ADALAH UPAYA PEMUTIHAN HIZBIYAH Yang kami yakini, ketika Anda menegaskan pengulangan sampai 4 kali 'tazkiyah' atas akidah Rodja sama dengan akidah Ahlussunnah itu jelas ucapan "vonis" yang diiringi dasar keilmuan SETELAH mempelajari Rodja dan para dainya secara utuh. Maka mempertanyakan "Apa bukti penyimpa

9 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTC≈2,780 viewsread 10 September 2026
Forwarded from @abuhazim_faris

Akhir-akhir ini muncul berbagai komentar/status yang mengajak agar ketika menyampaikan suatu masalah, semua pendapat ulama disebutkan tanpa memilih pendapat yang dianggap paling rajih. Kemudian dibangun kesan bahwa jika seseorang merajihkan salah satu pendapat ulama, berarti ia mengajak kepada fanatisme terhadap seorang ulama. Bahkan ada yang menyebut bahwa manhaj tarjih adalah manhaj fanatik dan taqlid. Lalu muncu

9 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC≈2,140 viewsread 10 September 2026
Forwarded from @abuhazim_faris

* Apa sebenarnya sikap terhadap Rodja? * Apa sikap terhadap MLM? * Apa sikap terhadap Mushofiqah? * Apa sikap terhadap berbagai penyimpangan yang selama ini dipermasalahkan para asatidzah? Selama hal-hal tersebut tidak dijelaskan secara terang, maka wajar apabila sebagian ikhwan masih merasa belum tenang. Bukan karena ingin mencari-cari kesalahan, tetapi karena persoalan ini menyangkut arah dakwah, manhaj, dan oran

9 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC≈2,050 viewsread 10 September 2026
Forwarded from @abuhazim_faris

Beberapa Catatan atas Klarifikasi Tersebut 1. Apa yang dimaksud dengan "memuji Rodja"? Pada poin pertama disebutkan bahwa tidak pernah ada pujian kepada Rodja, bahkan sampai disertai sumpah. Namun perlu dijelaskan terlebih dahulu, apa definisi "pujian" yang dimaksud? Apabila seseorang mengatakan bahwa Rodja, RII, dan yang semisalnya masih Ahlus Sunnah, atau memberikan kesan bahwa penyimpangan mereka bukan perkara

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @matanxminhaj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Nisaa` As-Sunnah
@NisaaAssunnah · 22,860
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 September 2026
SyababSalafy️
@syababsalafy · 22,909
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
SALAFY CIREBON 🇮🇩
@salafy_cirebon · 28,015
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Matan Minhaj” (@matanxminhaj), 3,640 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/matanxminhaj.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.