Channel
@sekelumitsejarah
On this record: Topic ยท Also posting the same content ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
3,669subscribers
-36 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001150214778 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sekelumitsejarah |
| Created | Between 1 February 2018 and 31 October 2021 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sekelumitsejarah |
Religion โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
This channelโs posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable โ 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times โ 60%, no better than a coin flip โ because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channelโs history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying โ a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story โ and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 3,669 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 3,670 | +3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 3,667 | -7 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:56 | 3,674 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:47 | 3,683 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 3,684 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 3,682 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 3,686 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 3,689 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 3,686 | -11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 3,697 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:40 | 3,706 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 3,705 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
75 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ฅ | 52 | 69.3% | |
| ๐ | 23 | 30.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
4. Matrik Ringkasan Cacat Argumentasi Al-Halabi Kesimpulan Operasional Berdasarkan tinjauan naqd as-sanad wa al-matn (kritik sanad dan isi), pengakuan Al-Halabi gugur secara metodologis. Klaim mendengarkan dan mentranskrip sendiri tanpa pernah menghadirkan bukti audio fisik di tengah absennya persaksian dari pihak Yaman dan Saudi menjadikan pembelaannya sebagai argumen melingkar yang tidak bisa dijadikan hujjah iโฆ
๐ฅ3
7โฃ. AL-HALABI TERJATUH PADA LUBANG JEBAKANNYA SENDIRI: REKAMAN FIKTIF SYAIKH UTSAIMIN DI BALIK TRANSKRIP PENENTANGAN TERHADAP LAJNAH DAIMAH https://t.me/sekelumitsejarah/3353 Halamannya menjadi saksi! Ya, halaman buku Al-Halabi yang dengan pongahnya dijadikan rujukan oleh Halabiyun Situs Rodja dan dedengkotnya untuk melawan, mengingkari dan menantang tahdzir Lajnah ad-Daimah terhadap madzhab Murji'ah Syaikh besarnyโฆ
๐ฅ2
Jika Syaikh Besarnya Terjebak Perangkap Logika Buatannya Sendiri Ketika Berlindung Di Belakang Nama Besar Syaikh Utsaimin, Maka Bagaimana Mungkin Halabiyun Rodja Dan Para Dedengkot Dainya Akan Mampu Menyelamatkan Jarh Lajnah Daimah Atas Akidah Murji'ah Syaikh Besar Mereka?! Ini adalah kelanjutan dari penyingkapanยฒ kita atas akidah Murji'ah Syaikh Besar Rodja dan upayaยฒ licik dan dustanya dalam berkelit dari tahdzir โฆ
๐ฅ3
SERANGAN BRUTAL DEDENGKOT PEMILIK AKIDAH RODJA TERHADAP FATWA JARH MUFASSAR LAJNAH TERHADAP AKIDAH MURJI'AH ALI HASAN AL-HALABI Provokasi Badrusalam kepada pengikutnya untuk mendelegitimasi keshahihan fatwa Lajnah dalam membentengi umat dari penyebaran akidah Murji'ah Syaikh besar Rodja: "Ya, saya merasa heran justru sama orang yang hanya Taklid kepada Lajnah Daimah tapi tidak membaca perkataan para ulama yang lainโฆ
๐ฅ3๐1
Seri Ke-6 Membongkar Kontradiksi Dan Kelicikan Klaim Pembelaan Syaikh Utsaimin Terhadap Akidah Murji'ah Ali Hasan Al-Halabi
๐ฅ2๐1
Tanazzul Jadali Tuk Bedah Kelicikan Halabiyun Rodja & Para Dedengkot Dainya Yang Bersungguhยฒ Membela Akidah Murji'ah Al-Halabi Sampai pun Mencomot Nama Besar Syaikh Ibnu Utsaimin Rahimahullah Akidah Rodja Akidah Ahlussunnah Wahai Hari Ahadi Sang Pewaris Ijazah Kutubus Sittah?! Ataukah Salafiyun harus tersilaukan dengan pemasangan gelarmu agar menerima fatwa akidah Halabiyun RODJA-mu?! Kami datang dengan hujjah danโฆ
๐ฅ3๐2
6. MEMBONGKAR KONTRADIKSI PEMBELAAN "SYAIKH UTSAIMIN" TERHADAP SYAIKH BESAR RODJA (NARAPIDANA AKIDAH MURJI'AH ALI HASAN AL-HALABI): KLAIM FATWA YANG RUNTUH DARI TULISANNYA SENDIRI https://t.me/sekelumitsejarah/3348 Pernyataan Ali al-Halabi dalam teks pembelaannya mengandung kontradiksi logika mendasar (ุชูุงูุถ ู ูุทูู) dan cacat metodologi ilmiah (anomali amanat ilmiah). Kontradiksi ini secara otomatis merusak kredibilโฆ
๐ฅ4๐1
๐ฅAl-Halabi Meruntuhkan Fatwa (Syaikh Utsaimin) Yang Dia Bangun Sendiri, Halaman Bukunya Menjadi Saksiโ ๏ธ Firman Allah Ta'ala: ููููุง ููุญูููู ุงููู ูููุฑู ุงูุณูููููุฆู ุฅููููุง ุจูุฃููููููู "Rencana jahat/makar yang buruk itu tidak akan menimpa kecuali kepada orang yang merencanakannya sendiri." (QS. Fathir: 43) Demikian pula mengingatkan kita pada pepatah: ู ููู ุญูููุฑู ุญูููุฑูุฉู ููุฃูุฎูููู ููููุนู ููููููุง "Barangsiapa menggalโฆ
๐ฅ4๐1
5. AL-HALABI MEMBONGKAR KELICIKAN PARA PEMBELANYA, HALABIYUN RODJA DAN PARA DAI DEDENGKOTNYA https://t.me/sekelumitsejarah/3346 Tanazzul Jadali sebagai cara efektif untuk menguliti kontradiksi dan kelicikan penyebaran propaganda (tadlis) Halabiyun Rodja dan para dedengkotnya. Berikut poin-poin argumentatif untuk mematahkan syubhat dan membongkar caraยฒ licik pembelaan Halabiyun Rodja dan para dedengkot dainya terhaโฆ
๐4๐ฅ2
TANAZZUL JADALI, SEJENAK 'BERGEMBIRA' BERSAMA KLAIM ALI HASAN AL-HALABI DAN HALABIYUN RODJA, FATWA SYAIKH UTSAMIN BENARยฒ NYATA MEMBELA AL-HALABI? Tanazzul Jadali. Anggaplah pernyataan Syaikh Utsaimin tersebut didukung fakta yang kuat. Namun kenapa Halabiyun Rodja dan para dedengkotnya hanya menyebarkan pernyataan Syaikh pada kotak pertama dan tidak menyebarkan pernyataan Syaikh Utsaimin pada kotak kedua untuk mendelโฆ
๐2๐ฅ1
https://t.me/sekelumitsejarah/3343 B. Perbedaan Mendasar https://t.me/sekelumitsejarah/3343 Tuduhan atas Syaikh al-Albani: Berasal dari orang-orang ekstrem/Haddadiyah/Khawarij (seperti Hisyam al-Biyali atau kelompok takfiri) tanpa bukti ilmiah yang sah, sehingga ditolak secara tegas oleh Syaikh al-Fauzan. Bukan hanya Syaikh Al-Fauzan, bahkan situs Rodja sendiri secara resmi mengakui pengingkaran Syaikh Utsaimin tโฆ
๐3๐ฅ1
4. LICIKNYA AL-HALABI DAN QIYAS RUSAK HALABIYUN Alihยฒ mendustakan secara ilmiah Jarh Mufassar Lajnah Daimah, narasi pembelaan VONIS MURJI'AHnya AL-HALABI yang dibangun oleh Al-Halabi dan Halabiyun situs Radio Rodja dan Badrusalam melawan Lajnah dengan cara bergelantungan pada ketokohan Syaikh Utsaimin dan Syaikh al-Albani rahimahumallah. A. Realitanya: Al-Fauzan mendustakan tuduhan Murji'ah pada Al-Albani rahimahuโฆ
๐2๐ฅ2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sekelumitsejarah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ธโ๐ชโ๐ฐโ๐ชโ๐ฑโ๐บโ๐ฒโ๐ฎโ๐นโ ๐ธโ๐ชโ๐ฏโ๐ฆโ๐ทโ๐ฆโ๐ญโ (@sekelumitsejarah), 3,669 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sekelumitsejarah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.