Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Investig'Action

Channel

Investig'Action

@InvestigAction2004

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

5,164subscribers

-29 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001445544836
TypeChannel
Username@InvestigAction2004
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/InvestigAction2004

Growth

5,1645,1935,178.57 August 2026 — 5,193 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,193 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,191 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,183 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,179 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,177 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,171 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,172 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,170 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,164 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 21 days, net -29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,160–5,197 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 18:535,164-6
25 Aug 2026, 21:135,170-2
22 Aug 2026, 11:065,172+1
19 Aug 2026, 02:275,171-6
16 Aug 2026, 06:585,177-2
13 Aug 2026, 02:045,179-4
10 Aug 2026, 11:545,183-8
7 Aug 2026, 22:075,191-2
7 Aug 2026, 11:315,193no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:225,193first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

971 reactions across 20 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍43945.2%
💯10610.9%
🤬788.03%
737.52%
🔥676.90%
🤮434.43%
😈394.02%
🤡272.78%
👏262.68%
🙏151.54%
💩121.24%
🤣121.24%
😁60.618%
🖕50.515%
🤔50.515%
👎40.412%
🕊40.412%
😢40.412%
🤝20.206%
👌10.103%
3 further kinds30.309%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 971reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2026 to 14 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Apr 2026, 10:29 UTC≈2,850 views66 reactionsread 12 August 2026

"J’ai assisté à la conférence de presse donnée par Rima Hassan et son avocat Vincent Brengarth. Et j’ai eu honte." https://investigaction.net/rima-hassan-face-a-des-hyenes-a-plumes-et-cameras-un-suicide-de-la-presse/

👍497🤔4😢4🤝2

14 Apr 2026, 07:17 UTC≈2,770 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Qui a le droit de négocier ? Est-ce celui qui signe les accords ? Ou celui qui est déporté ? Est-ce celui qui parle ? Ou celui qui se fait tuer ? https://investigaction.net/sur-la-table-des-negociations-sur-le-liban-des-hors-doeuvres-a-base-de-morceaux-de-chair-humaine-et-de-sang-cest-a-vomir/

15👏8💯6👍2🤩1

28 Mar 2026, 18:10 UTC≈3,640 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Dans ce numéro, les cris d'alarme de l'armée israélienne, le fardeau de Vance, des journalistes qui se rebiffent, l'Europe flouée jusqu'à la moelle... https://investigaction.net/iran-journal-de-guerre-10/

👍44🤣122

17 Mar 2026, 09:31 UTC≈4,230 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Dans ce numéro, des critiques inattendues, l'amateurisme de Witkoff, tensions entre Ryad et Téhéran... https://investigaction.net/iran-journal-de-guerre-6/

👍33💯164😁1

5 Mar 2026, 11:04 UTC≈4,770 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Dans ce numéro: affrontements à Bahreïn, l'Espagne et l'Otan, archive embarrassante pour Trump et y a-t-il un plombier dans le porte-avions... https://investigaction.net/iran-journal-de-guerre-2/

👍52💯8👎2

4 Mar 2026, 18:26 UTC≈3,720 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Des objectifs qui changent, une stratégie qui laisse pantois... Chronique d'une défaite annoncée? https://investigaction.net/majed-nehme-lintervention-en-iran-illustre-le-degre-zero-de-lintelligence-politique/

💯30👍14😁51

1 Mar 2026, 13:36 UTC≈3,590 views57 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Caitlin Johnstone, sans détours... https://investigaction.net/jemmerde-tous-ceux-qui-ont-rendu-cette-guerre-possible/

🔥2917💯11

1 Mar 2026, 10:03 UTC≈3,210 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Les frappes américano-israéliennes contre l’Iran s’inscrivent dans une guerre longue de plusieurs décennies contre la République islamique qui a toujours refusé de se plier aux exigences de Washington en renonçant à sa souveraineté. https://investigaction.net/une-guerre-qui-ne-peut-pas-etre-gagnee-israel-et-les-etats-unis-bombardent-liran/

👍42🔥51👌1

28 Feb 2026, 07:50 UTC≈2,740 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026

L’Ukraine saigne, la Russie tient bon et l’Europe paie la facture. Après quatre ans de guerre, une question s’impose : poursuivre la folie guerrière ou trouver le courage de chercher la paix ? https://investigaction.net/quatre-ans-de-guerre-en-ukraine-des-millions-de-victimes-mais-lindustrie-de-larmement-est-en-fete/

👍29🙏94🔥4🕊1

27 Feb 2026, 16:48 UTC≈2,550 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Le Conseil de paix du président américain Donald Trump envisage la création d’une cryptomonnaie pour la bande de Gaza, présentée comme une tentative de relancer l’économie de Gaza après deux ans de génocide israélien contre les Palestiniens. https://investigaction.net/proposition-de-monnaie-numerique-a-gaza-lamerique-termine-le-genocide-sur-le-plan-economique/

🤡27😈13🤬9🖕5🔥31

27 Feb 2026, 09:35 UTC≈2,290 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Gaza avait parachevé la ruine morale et éthique des élites politiques et médiatiques françaises. L'affaire Quentin finalise leur mue fasciste. https://investigaction.net/le-fascisme-nuit-a-la-sante-et-a-la-verite/

👍28💯6👎21

23 Feb 2026, 07:01 UTC≈2,600 views57 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Á la Conférence de sécurité de Munich, le samedi 14 février 2026, le secrétaire d’État américain Marco Rubio a exposé avec une brutalité et une clarté saisissantes la nature profondément raciste, impérialiste et belliqueuse d’une idéologie de la classe dirigeante de Washington, porteuse de menaces graves pour l’humanité. https://investigaction.net/a-munich-leurope-applaudit-le-nouveau-colonialisme/

🤮34💩124😈4💯2🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @InvestigAction2004. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Investig'Action” (@InvestigAction2004), 5,164 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/InvestigAction2004.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.