Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Hamas/Tsahal 🇺🇸🇮🇱⚡️🇮🇷

Channel

Hamas/Tsahal 🇺🇸🇮🇱⚡️🇮🇷

@strategie_militaire

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

22,585subscribers

-88 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001958506070
TypeChannel
Username@strategie_militaire
DescriptionLes infos compilées en temps réel sur le conflit entre le Hamas et Tsahal ainsi que sur tous les èvènements qui y sont plus ou moins liés. Nous couvrons les tensions 🇺🇸🇮🇱⚡️🇮🇷 ici. Info/Ads: @geocurieux
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/strategie_militaire

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 4 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@strategie_militaire/26940 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC@Chroniquesennews/163354 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC1.002.3 hours
@strategie_militaire/26943 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC@Chroniquesennews/163476 Aug 2026, 06:25 UTC1.0035 hours
@strategie_militaire/26947 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC@Chroniquesennews/163486 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC1.0014 hours
@strategie_militaire/26948 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC@Chroniquesennews/163506 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC1.0015 hours
@strategie_militaire/26949 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC@Chroniquesennews/163546 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC1.007.9 hours
@strategie_militaire/26950 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC@Chroniquesennews/163597 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC1.0015 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Chroniquesennews7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0015 hoursthis entry (70)
@lanouvelledonne5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0012 hoursthis entry (50)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 27 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @strategie_militaire — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

22,58522,67322,6296 August 2026 — 22,673 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,667 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,654 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,639 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,630 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,619 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,611 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,598 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,594 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,585 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 11 days, net -88. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,572–22,686 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 13:3822,585-9
16 Aug 2026, 05:2722,594-4
14 Aug 2026, 13:3522,598-13
13 Aug 2026, 06:2722,611-8
12 Aug 2026, 09:0222,619-11
11 Aug 2026, 06:2722,630-9
9 Aug 2026, 10:5122,639-15
8 Aug 2026, 13:1522,654-13
7 Aug 2026, 16:1422,667-6
6 Aug 2026, 22:0122,673first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.2%
avg views ÷ 22,585 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,980
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
33
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held33 (3 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total98,239
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 03:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
105
Videos
102
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 59s
Average length
1m 59s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC≈3,690 viewsread 18 August 2026

Très chers membres, Nous prenons une pause de quelques jours, le temps de recharger nos batteries et de revenir encore plus en forme avec un rythme hyper régulier. D'ici là, nous vous invitions à rejoindre l'ensemble de nos canaux en cliquant ici! Merci et à bientôt!

10 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC≈3,680 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Le président Trump via Truth Social : J'ai constaté que des représentants de la République islamique d'Iran demandent une compensation pour les dommages subis lors du conflit militaire des cinq derniers mois (qui a débuté parce qu'ils NE DOIVENT PAS AVOIR D'ARME NUCLÉAIRE), alors que cela n'a jamais été mentionné dans nos négociations ou réunions. Mais c'est une idée intéressante, car je demande également à l'Iran

10 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC≈2,750 viewsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @geoeconomiePhoto

Comment l’Iran contrôle-t-il le réseau Internet ?

10 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC≈3,150 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Le Guide suprême de l'Iran, l'ayatollah Seyyed Mojtaba Khamenei, a annoncé plusieurs nominations de hauts responsables militaires : Général de division Ali Abdollahi — Chef d'état-major des forces armées Amiral Kiumars Heydari — Sous-chef d'état-major Général de division Ahmad Vahidi — Commandant des Gardiens de la révolution islamique (IRGC) Général de division Mostafa Izadi — Sous-commandant des Gardiens de la

9 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC≈3,500 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Le Pentagone fait pression sur les entreprises de défense américaines pour qu'elles augmentent rapidement la production d'armes, après que la guerre en Iran ait considérablement réduit les stocks de munitions américains, selon le Washington Post. Dans une note obtenue par le Washington Post, le sous-secrétaire à la Défense, Steve Feinberg, a donné aux entreprises 21 jours pour proposer des livraisons plus rapides, u

8 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC≈3,530 viewsread 18 August 2026

Le Conseil suprême de sécurité nationale iranien a déclaré que le détroit d'Ormuz « ne sera pas rouvert » tant que les États-Unis « ne corrigeront pas leur comportement ». Le conseil a exposé six conditions : la fin des menaces et des insultes des États-Unis à l'égard de l'Iran ; la fin définitive de la guerre et des attaques contre l'Iran et ses alliés au Liban, en Palestine, au Yémen et en Irak ; la levée du blocu

7 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC≈3,430 viewsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @strategiemilitairePhoto

Le Sénat américain a adopté, par 86 voix contre 11, un projet de loi renforçant les sanctions contre la Russie et l’Iran. Le texte, soutenu par le défunt sénateur Lindsey Graham, doit désormais être examiné par la Chambre des représentants. Le projet de loi autorise le président américain à imposer des droits de douane ciblés pouvant atteindre 100 % sur les importations en provenance des cinq plus grands acheteurs d

7 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC≈3,020 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

La résistance islamique en Irak annonce le report de l'attaque prévue contre l'Arabie saoudite et les bases américaines au Moyen-Orient, en réponse à l'appel précédent lancé par Hadi al-Amiri et d'autres dirigeants politiques irakiens.

7 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC≈2,850 viewsread 18 August 2026

Le secrétaire général de l'organisation Badr, Hadi al-Amiri, a appelé les milices irakiennes à ne pas riposter contre l'Arabie saoudite suite aux frappes américano-saoudiennes contre des sites des Forces de mobilisation populaire (PMF) les 28 et 29 juillet. L'organisation Badr contrôle directement dix brigades des Forces de mobilisation populaire et est profondément ancrée au sein des institutions de l'État irakien.

7 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC≈2,320 viewsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @diplomatiesPhoto

🇹🇷🇸🇦🇵🇰 Un responsable turc a déclaré à Reuters que l'accord de La Mecque, nouvellement signé entre la Turquie, le Pakistan et l'Arabie saoudite, est « purement défensif », et que les pays signataires s'engagent à se soutenir mutuellement uniquement à des fins défensives. Le responsable a souligné que cet accord n'est dirigé contre aucun pays ou acteur en particulier, et qu'il reste ouvert à d'autres États de la rég

7 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC649 viewsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @diplomatiesPhoto

🇸🇦🇹🇷🇵🇰 La Turquie, le Pakistan et l'Arabie saoudite ont signé leur nouvel accord de défense trilatéral, appelé l'accord de La Mecque. La disposition centrale de cet accord est une clause de défense collective : toute attaque armée contre l'un des trois États sera considérée comme une attaque contre tous. Cet accord vise à renforcer la dissuasion collective contre l'agression et à élargir la coopération en matière d

7 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC≈2,130 viewsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @diplomatiesPhoto

🇸🇦🇹🇷🇵🇰 La Turquie, le Pakistan et l'Arabie saoudite ont signé leur nouvel accord de défense trilatéral, appelé l'accord de La Mecque. La disposition centrale de cet accord est une clause de défense collective : toute attaque armée contre l'un des trois États sera considérée comme une attaque contre tous. Cet accord vise à renforcer la dissuasion collective contre l'agression et à élargir la coopération en matière d

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @strategie_militaire. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,057,320 of 1,507,151entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hamas/Tsahal 🇺🇸🇮🇱⚡️🇮🇷” (@strategie_militaire), 22,585 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strategie_militaire.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.