Channel
@eurointel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
9,854subscribers
+45 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002281264507 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eurointel |
| Description | Bringing you the latest news, current events, and developing stories from every corner of the world. |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eurointel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 9,854 | +20 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:51 | 9,834 | +29 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 9,805 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:49 | 9,809 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 9,809 | first reading |
240 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 215 of 240 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 240 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 84,162 |
| Reactions total | 2,500 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,135 reactions across 195 posts, in 50 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 395 | 18.5% | |
| 😁 | 283 | 13.3% | |
| ❤ | 190 | 8.90% | |
| 🤮 | 133 | 6.23% | |
| 👍 | 126 | 5.90% | |
| 👏 | 123 | 5.76% | |
| 🤡 | 123 | 5.76% | |
| 💩 | 112 | 5.25% | |
| 👎 | 99 | 4.64% | |
| 🔥 | 93 | 4.36% | |
| 🥰 | 48 | 2.25% | |
| 🤬 | 45 | 2.11% | |
| 🌚 | 44 | 2.06% | |
| 😭 | 44 | 2.06% | |
| 🥴 | 30 | 1.41% | |
| 🍌 | 28 | 1.31% | |
| 😱 | 28 | 1.31% | |
| 🤔 | 24 | 1.12% | |
| 🤯 | 22 | 1.03% | |
| 😢 | 15 | 0.703% | |
| 30 further kinds | 130 | 6.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 215 of the 240 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,500reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 240 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eurointel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 240 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇩🇪 Germany’s government has approved a draft law giving its intelligence agencies significantly broader powers, removing restrictions that have been in place since the post-war period. The 700-page bill would give the BND legal authority to conduct active cyberattacks, including manipulating or deleting an adversary’s data. German agents would also be allowed to secretly alter weapons-production instructions or tech…
👌3👎3💩2
🇷🇺 In Russia, a person who wanted to record Putin's motorcade suddenly realized they were standing right next to him.
🥰9❤3🕊1
🇬🇧🇺🇦🇷🇺 Boris Johnson rejects claims he sabotaged Russia-Ukraine peace talks in 2022. “This is complete nonsense,” Johnson said, arguing no Western leader could have stopped Ukraine from fighting. His message to Zelenskyy, he says, was simple: “If you want to fight, we will be with you.”
🖕3❤1🤡1🤬1
Signed Деспот Стефан
🇺🇸 🇺🇦 🇷🇺 The U.S. told Ukraine to end drone strikes on oil tankers using a major Russian port over fears the attacks could destabilize global energy markets.
❤3
🇲🇪🇺🇦 Police in Podgorica busted a huge Ukrainian scam call center.
😁7❤1
🇮🇩🇺🇸 Indonesia rules out U.S. military bases on its soil. Defense Minister Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin says cooperation with Washington remains focused on military training while respecting Indonesia’s sovereignty. Democracy can wait, apparently sovereignty comes first.
👏6
Signed Деспот Стефан
🇨🇦🇺🇦 University of Alberta wins the right to dissolve a research fund named after Waffen-SS veteran Yaroslav Hunka. The controversy erupted in 2023 when Hunka was honored in Canada’s Parliament during Zelenskyy’s visit, receiving a standing ovation from lawmakers.
💩7❤2😁2
Signed Деспот Стефан
🇨🇴 The death toll from Colombia’s devastating earthquake has risen to 254, while around 3,000 people remain missing as rescue operations continue. The situation remains critical as crews search through the rubble for survivors.
👎2
Signed Деспот Стефан
🇱🇹 Lithuania to spend 50 million euro digging moats along its border with Belarus. At least some sections are going to be 150m wide.
🔥5💩2
🇱🇻 Latvia forgot to buy ammo for its newly purchased anti-drone systems, the country's prime minister admitted.
🤣12💩1😭1
🇺🇲🇷🇺🇺🇦 Shorty after Ashton Kutcher addressed Russian president, large-scale Russian drone attack underway over Kyiv. Multiple explosions have been reported across the Ukrainian capital as air defenses engage incoming drones. The attack is ongoing. Dear Ashton please don't address Putin ever again.
🤣13✍2❤2😁2🥰1
Signed Деспот Стефан
🇺🇲 Ashton Kutcher addressed President Putin. The next move by the Russian President will be observed by admin team of Eurointel+
🤣12🔥1
Signed Деспот Стефан
Showing the 12 most recent of 240 posts we hold for @eurointel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Who do you respect more?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you believe in an interventionist god?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Would you want to attend a festival of Ghanian culture?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Honeymoon in North Korea?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
For a fat woman, what is a bigger insult?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Panic time?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 240 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 25,796 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Eurointel+” (@eurointel), 9,854 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eurointel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.