Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Youssef HINDI

@YoussefHindi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15,613subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001214535459
TypeChannel
Username@YoussefHindi
Created15 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/YoussefHindi

Growth

15,60915,63615,622.56 August 2026 — 15,617 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,609 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,636 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,632 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,624 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,622 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,615 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,614 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,613 subscribers15,6136 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,605–15,640 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 17:4915,613-1
13 Aug 2026, 10:1315,614-1
12 Aug 2026, 09:0315,615-7
11 Aug 2026, 11:1715,622-2
10 Aug 2026, 10:3715,624-8
9 Aug 2026, 09:5215,632-4
8 Aug 2026, 12:0515,636+27
7 Aug 2026, 08:5215,609-8
6 Aug 2026, 10:3115,617first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.4%
avg views ÷ 15,613 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,620
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held50 (29 July 202613 August 2026)
Views total80,905
Reactions total1,306
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,306 reactions across 50 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍98875.7%
1199.11%
👌947.20%
🤣251.91%
🙏151.15%
🤡151.15%
🔥110.842%
🤔100.766%
😁70.536%
👎50.383%
💩50.383%
💯30.23%
🖕30.23%
🏆10.077%
👀10.077%
👏10.077%
😱10.077%
🤝10.077%
🤩10.077%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,306reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC969 views27 reactionsread 14 August 2026

GÉOPOLITIQUE DES FINS DERNIÈRES https://youtu.be/6Fecy-xAK4U?si=gdzSV-7yEtEaif6E

👌19👍62

12 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC≈1,340 views30 reactionsread 14 August 2026

RENDEZ-VOUS CE SOIR À 18H! https://youtu.be/6Fecy-xAK4U?si=gdzSV-7yEtEaif6E

👍30

12 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC≈1,340 views25 reactionsread 14 August 2026

“En 2003, alors que les États-Unis de George W. Bush s’apprêtent à bombarder l’Irak sous l’influence du lobby pro-israélien, le président américain tentait de convaincre le président français Jacques Chirac en arguant qu’il s’agissait de la guerre de Gog et Magog.” https://open.substack.com/pub/youssefhindi/p/geopolitique-des-fins-dernieres?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=2wv8tz

👍241

12 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC≈1,330 views20 reactionsread 14 August 2026

RENDEZ-VOUS CE SOIR À 18H! https://youtu.be/6Fecy-xAK4U?si=gdzSV-7yEtEaif6E

👍20

11 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC≈1,450 views29 reactionsread 14 August 2026

"Les dirigeants américains ne sont pas tous des fanatiques évangéliques, mais l’on remarque tout de même une certaine continuité hégémoniste et messianique dans la politique extérieure étasunienne, que les démocrates ou les républicains soient au pouvoir. " https://open.substack.com/pub/youssefhindi/p/geopolitique-des-fins-dernieres?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=2wv8tz

👍21👌61🤡1

11 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC≈1,500 views26 reactionsread 14 August 2026

"Du point de vue du sionisme messianique, le retour du peuple juif en Terre sainte ne suffit pas. La réalisation du Grand Israël passe par des guerres de grande échelle, tout particulièrement celle de Gog et Magog." https://open.substack.com/pub/youssefhindi/p/geopolitique-des-fins-dernieres?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=2wv8tz

👍16👌73

10 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC≈1,560 views28 reactionsread 14 August 2026

"L’influence qu’exerce l’eschatologie messianique dans la géopolitique mondiale et, plus précisément, dans les cercles de pouvoir israélo-américains est apparue au grand jour au cours des dernières années, et de façon accentuée pendant le génocide à Gaza. Les dirigeants israéliens et américains font désormais des déclarations explicites." https://open.substack.com/pub/youssefhindi/p/geopolitique-des-fins-dernieres?u

👍271

10 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC≈2,250 views43 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Je vois passer toutes sortes de commentaires et d'analyses hasardeuses sur le Maroc et le Maghreb en général, fondées sur une ignorance crasse. Je vous invite à regarder cette vidéo sur la stratégie des États-Unis en Afrique du Nord pour saisir les enjeux actuels. https://youtu.be/XmKDMe9LvG8?si=FrTNwGOuNJVLY0eB

👍249🙏7🤡2😁1

10 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC≈1,520 views13 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Publication, ce soir à 18H30 sur Substack, de mon nouvel article : “GÉOPOLITIQUE DES FINS DERNIÈRES” https://substack.com/@youssefhindi?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=2wv8tz

👍13

10 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC≈1,460 views20 reactionsread 14 August 2026

https://youtu.be/87nVm36FaNw?si=kA_wOpBFOntoDoCK

👌12👍61👏1

9 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC≈1,570 views23 reactionsread 14 August 2026

RENDEZ-VOUS CE SOIR À 20H ! https://youtu.be/87nVm36FaNw?si=kA_wOpBFOntoDoCK

👍23

9 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC≈1,390 views46 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @la_realgeopolitikPhoto

La récente fermeture du consulat d'Israel à Chengdu est décrite dans les médias de masse comme la simple conséquence des positions de la Chine sur la question palestinienne et particulièrement le génocide en cours à Gaza, ainsi que sur l'agression israélo-américaine sur l'Iran. Le consul israélien s'est fendu d'un message enthousiaste sur l'amitié avec la Chine, comme s'il s'agissait d'une fermeture temporaire pour r

👌3410🙏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @YoussefHindi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 521,113 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Youssef HINDI” (@YoussefHindi), 15,613 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YoussefHindi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.