Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Я РАЙТРАУН

@raitraunlive

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

43,988subscribers

-102 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001459936210
TypeChannel
Username@raitraunlive
Created10 July 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/raitraunlive

Growth

43,98844,09044,0396 August 2026 — 44,090 subscribers6 August 2026 — 44,090 subscribers6 August 2026 — 44,052 subscribers7 August 2026 — 44,047 subscribers8 August 2026 — 44,037 subscribers9 August 2026 — 44,031 subscribers10 August 2026 — 44,023 subscribers11 August 2026 — 44,014 subscribers12 August 2026 — 44,002 subscribers13 August 2026 — 43,988 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net -102. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,973–44,105 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:4843,988-14
12 Aug 2026, 13:4444,002-12
11 Aug 2026, 12:1544,014-9
10 Aug 2026, 13:3344,023-8
9 Aug 2026, 15:1344,031-6
8 Aug 2026, 14:5844,037-10
7 Aug 2026, 17:3244,047-5
6 Aug 2026, 19:2644,052-38
6 Aug 2026, 03:1544,090no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:0844,090first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.8%
avg views ÷ 43,988 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,500
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held23 (3 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total148,840
Reactions total3,650
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 02s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,347 reactions across 23 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2,11433.3%
🔥1,67926.5%
1,33721.1%
🤪3525.55%
👍2964.66%
🍾1121.76%
🥰781.23%
😢620.977%
😎530.835%
🆒380.599%
❤‍🔥310.488%
💊290.457%
👏210.331%
160.252%
😱160.252%
🥴160.252%
🦄130.205%
💅110.173%
💯90.142%
🤔70.11%
18 further kinds570.898%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,347reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 23 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @raitraunlive. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC≈6,420 views238 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Замерз комп, подскажите к какому мастеру обратиться

😁142🔥61🆒272💅2🥴2❤‍🔥1🍓1

10 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC≈8,020 views193 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

Прошло всего полторы недели отпуска, а я УЖЕ прошел это и это

🤪89🔥5816💊10😁10🦄5🐳2🤯2

8 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC≈9,200 views95 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @newradioruPhoto

Сегодня у нас не обычная серия «Красногорского парка», а специальный репортаж с концерта Егора Крида в Лужниках! Смотрите, как там было весело: YouTube: https://youtu.be/nrQgK3UmLdY VK Видео: https://vkvideo.ru/video-106042931_456249229

🔥57😁269🤪2😎1

4 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC≈16,200 views377 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Video

Меня просто позвали на улицу, я не собираюсь ходить на улицу

😁21996🤪51👍4🍌2🤩21🥰1

4 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC≈10,300 views112 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @newradioruPhoto

Суперновое, супермощное и супернепредсказуемое шоу Нового Радио — «ЧЕЙ ТРЕК?» ⚡️ Теперь каждые три недели Кирилл Калинин, Артём Райтраун, Эвелина Малинкина, Никита Никита и приглашённый гость будут угадывать друг друга с помощью треков. Победитель получает всеобщий РЭСПЭКТ, а проигравший — КРИНЖ-НАКАЗАНИЕ. Наш первооткрыватель, первопроходец — ST! Много говорить не будем, просто смотри! YouTube: youtu.be/4DW8luV4

56👍24🔥20❤‍🔥4🤪42🍾2

4 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC≈11,200 views328 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Чтоб вы понимали я вот в это время только просыпаюсь это если будильник не ставить

👍155😁9835🍾18🔥12🌚4👏3💊2

3 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC≈11,000 views784 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @newradioruVideo

Всем приииииивет уважаемые отпусколюбы и отпускодимы, на связи два человечка, которые за год успели наговорить 42 625 минут. Посчитали, и если слушать нас без остановки, то можно состариться примерно на 30 суток. За сезон получилось 217 выпусков, притащили 129 гостей, устроили 23 спецэфира, где были: валера дистинейшн, диджей любовь, паровая баня, шашлыки, новогоднее шоу, где мы все вместе с другими ведущими сидели,

🔥508😁122🥰6749👍16😎10🍾3🐳3

21 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTC≈16,400 views1,000 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @kalinin_onlinePhoto

На фото молодой Кирилл Калинин купает полугодовалого Артёмку Селиванова. Через много лет они встретятся в шоу 1+1 на Новом радио. Человеческие судьбы удивительны.

😁81394🤪50🔥255🙊4🆒3🍓2

17 Jul 2026, 17:28 UTC≈22,700 views105 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @newradioruPhoto

Живая природа удивительна, вот например цветы. Растут себе, бери да поливай. А вот кладовку стоит разбирать хотя бы раз в месяц. Но это не про Калинина и Райтрауна. Смотри новую серию «Красногорского парка» YouTube: https://youtu.be/We21DxkBRug VK Видео: https://vkvideo.ru/video-106042931_456249112

87🔥13😁5

17 Jul 2026, 15:31 UTC≈20,400 views136 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @doctor_maychukVideo

О лазерной коррекции от первого лица 👌 Я часто оперирую знаменитостей, политиков, крутых медийных персонажей, но мне всегда очень неудобно попросить сфотографироваться или оставить отзыв 🤷🏻‍♀️ Но раз уж сам пациент, известный радиоведущий Райтраун https://t.me/raitraunlive (Артём Селиванов) рассказал о своем опыте недавней операции у меня в прямом эфире своего утреннего шоу «1+1» на @newradio.ru, то не могу упусти

🔥9028👍123🥰2🏆1

14 Jul 2026, 19:08 UTC≈17,000 views282 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Если что я живой, просто не могу пока уделить вам ВНИМАНИЕ, так что можете вообще пока творить все че вам вздумается видимо

175🍾40😎40🥴7❤‍🔥6💊4🆒4🌭3

13 Jul 2026, 19:03 UTC≈19,600 views413 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Завтра коррекция зрения, так что с завтра я уже буду чуть лучше видеть всю хуйню, которую вы тут пишете, так что за вами будет глаз да глаз (не шоколадный)

😁285🤪43🍾3426👍8🔥8🦄5🥴2

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @raitraunlive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 34,087 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Я РАЙТРАУН” (@raitraunlive), 43,988 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raitraunlive.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.