Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

VoiceHeard.Больше, чем английский.

@voiceheard

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

977subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001781879515
TypeChannel
Username@voiceheard
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/voiceheard

Growth

97710 Aug 2026, 02:30 — 977 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 08:35 — 977 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 02:3010 Aug 2026, 08:35
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 976–978 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 08:35977no change
10 Aug 2026, 02:30977first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.46%
avg views ÷ 977 subscribers
Avg views / post
72.9
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held17 (26 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,239
Reactions total57
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11m 08s
Average length
3m 43s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

57 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2645.6%
1729.8%
👍712.3%
❤‍🔥23.51%
🤝23.51%
11.75%
👏11.75%
💘11.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC33 viewsread 10 August 2026

Tomorrow : juicy vocabulary on gaslighting and more discussions. See you!

Signed Юлия Алексеева Преподаватель английского, методист, психолог

9 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC33 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

The video outlines key signs to distinguish gaslighting from a normal disagreement. Unlike a healthy argument where both sides seek a solution, gaslighting is about power and control. The key difference is that a gaslighter will manipulate you into doubting your own reality to gain the upper hand, damaging your mental and emotional health in the process. I really enjoyed this podcast. You?

Signed Юлия Алексеева Преподаватель английского, методист, психолог

9 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC37 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Have you ever felt it?

  1. Yes, I've felt everything50%
  2. No0%
  3. I'm not sure0%

Shares as published, totalling 50%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Юлия Алексеева Преподаватель английского, методист, психолог

9 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC35 viewsread 10 August 2026

You don’t always know you’re being gaslit. You just know something is...wrong! 1. Constant confusion You replay conversations in your head 100 times: - I can’t trust my own mind anymore. 2. Chronic guilt: You apologize for everything: for your tone, your needs, existing. - I’m sorry, I didn’t mean to upset you.. . 3. Walking on eggshells: You filter every word before you say it, and you’re terrified of the

Signed Юлия Алексеева Преподаватель английского, методист, психолог

9 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC42 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Gaslighting Dictionary: your survival guide for today. Hi guys! Today and tomorrow we are discusing one of the most interesting topic (anyway, it’s so intriguing for me!!) - gaslighting!! ✔️ We’ll uncover what gaslighting really is (and what it isn’t). ✔️ You’ll get the exact vocabulary to name the invisible pain ✔️ I’ll show you real dialogues and ways of manipulation ✔️ You'll get a clear plan how to survive And

🔥3👏1

Signed Юлия Алексеева Преподаватель английского, методист, психолог

7 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC56 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

What else can you add?

Signed Юлия Алексеева Преподаватель английского, методист, психолог

7 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC55 viewsread 10 August 2026

Great article and Test for you! How to recognise a toxic person 😜🙀 Click here : Am I in a toxic relationship? What's your result?

Signed Юлия Алексеева Преподаватель английского, методист, психолог

6 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC65 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Which toxic type have you met most often?

  1. Manipulator57%
  2. Energy drainer36%
  3. Overcritical person29%
  4. Someone who invalidates you43%
  5. Guilt-tripper14%

The shares total 179%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1🔥1

Signed Юлия Алексеева Преподаватель английского, методист, психолог

6 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC68 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥2

Signed Юлия Алексеева Преподаватель английского, методист, психолог

6 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC65 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

💀Toxic - poisonous, harmful 👎Manipulative - controlling, deceptive ☹️Draining - exhausting, energy-sucking 💩Overcritical - too judgmental 🐾Invalidating - dismissing your feelings 😤Guilt-tripping - making you feel guilty Which one do you recognise most? 👇

3🔥2

Signed Юлия Алексеева Преподаватель английского, методист, психолог

6 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC62 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Hi guys! This week I’m dedicating to... toxic people😄 No, I’m not inviting them over for tea🫖. I’m studying them. I'm not sure if I'm toxic myself - only my friends know the truth 😉 anyway, everyone experiences these.. hmm.. Kinda relationships.. So this week we talk about toxicity. With English,with psychology,without shame. Let’s start with nice phrases, first of all👇

🔥3

Signed Юлия Алексеева Преподаватель английского, методист, психолог

4 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC73 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

HI GUYS! 👋 While I'm sitting in the clinic waiting to finally cure this 5-week cough, I've started something that's healing my professional soul. I'm writing a BOOK. Yes, again, but this time non-fiction. This is my personal confession as a teacher and psychologist: how to deal with the toughest people, avoid burnout.. and actually enjoy what you do. And about my workaholism and how I deal with it as a teacher and

9

Signed Юлия Алексеева Преподаватель английского, методист, психолог

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @voiceheard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTCAnonymous Poll2 voters

Have you ever felt it?

  1. Yes, I've felt everything50%
  2. No0%
  3. I'm not sure0%

Shares as published, totalling 50%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTCAnonymous Poll14 voters

Which toxic type have you met most often?

  1. Manipulator57%
  2. Energy drainer36%
  3. Overcritical person29%
  4. Someone who invalidates you43%
  5. Guilt-tripper14%

The shares total 179%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

таскам время, потехе час
@poteha_time · 441,658
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VoiceHeard.Больше, чем английский.” (@voiceheard), 977 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/voiceheard.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.