Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for betty's wallpapers | обои

Channel

betty's wallpapers | обои

@betwaal

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,572subscribers

-44 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001680156624
TypeChannel
Username@betwaal
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded30 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/betwaal

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,57214,61814,59530 August 2026 — 14,616 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,616 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,618 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,613 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,611 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,607 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,602 subscribers8 September 2026 — 14,594 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,588 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,584 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,581 subscribers18 September 2026 — 14,572 subscribers30 August 202618 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 19 days, net -44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,565–14,625 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:3914,572-9
16 Sept 2026, 11:0214,581-3
13 Sept 2026, 04:1814,584-4
11 Sept 2026, 08:5914,588-6
8 Sept 2026, 17:5714,594-8
5 Sept 2026, 10:3714,602-5
3 Sept 2026, 13:4114,607-4
2 Sept 2026, 08:1314,611-2
1 Sept 2026, 06:4714,613-5
31 Aug 2026, 07:3314,618+2
30 Aug 2026, 19:1514,616no change
30 Aug 2026, 19:0014,616first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 25 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.5%
avg views ÷ 14,572 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,280
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held22 (25 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total65,640
Reactions total809
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 18:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

809 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 547229944480219678718022.2%
custom 535506059869659602617822.0%
custom 535503829493143592315719.4%
custom 525138992364627491412115.0%
custom 54587018188612325678810.9%
custom 5458743054842239529647.91%
custom 5458629491611964295212.60%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 809 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @betwaal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:04 UTC≈1,570 views26 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 535506059869659602616custom 545870181886123256710

2 Sept 2026, 13:04 UTC≈1,590 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🍎 #обои ♡ #сентябрь@betwaal

custom 535506059869659602616custom 54587018188612325678

1 Sept 2026, 15:01 UTC≈2,640 views94 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 545874305484223952954custom 535506059869659602626custom 545870181886123256712custom 54586294916119642952

1 Sept 2026, 15:01 UTC≈2,580 views72 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🍞 #обои ♡ #сентябрь@betwaal

custom 545870181886123256738custom 535506059869659602620custom 545862949161196429510custom 54587430548422395294

1 Sept 2026, 09:01 UTC≈2,940 views65 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 535506059869659602645custom 545870181886123256712custom 54586294916119642956custom 54587430548422395292

1 Sept 2026, 09:01 UTC≈2,840 views49 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🍁 #обои ♡ #сентябрь@betwaal

custom 535506059869659602634custom 54587018188612325678custom 54587430548422395294custom 54586294916119642953

31 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC≈3,380 views43 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 547229944480219678732custom 535503829493143592311

31 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC≈3,370 views55 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🍎 #обои ♡ #телефон@betwaal ♡ #животные@betwaal ♡ #фотообои@betwaal

custom 547229944480219678741custom 535503829493143592314

30 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC≈3,650 views33 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 525138992364627491423custom 53550382949314359238custom 54722994448021967872

30 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC≈3,610 views39 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🪷 #обои ♡ #телефон@betwaal ♡ #арт@betwaal ♡ #зеленый@betwaal

custom 525138992364627491429custom 53550382949314359236custom 53550605986965960264

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @betwaal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ОБОИ
@bewalls0 · 22,353
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 September 2026
Обои на телефон | HD | Фоны
@hd_oboi_na_telefon · 22,211
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 September 2026
всемприветик это хомалон
@ohhomeall · 23,122
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 21 September 2026
Essentials of Medical Science
@eoms_h · 132,102
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“betty's wallpapers | обои” (@betwaal), 14,572 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/betwaal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.