с любовью, я
по рекламе к @harukoharukoharuko. открыт набор на май
беседа https://t.me/+AexsdTSO11M4YjBi
РКН https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=672cb01aee419e4541443558®istryType=bloggersPermission
Created
25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +143. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,547–11,008 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 18:55
10,743
-22
11 Aug 2026, 17:36
10,765
-53
10 Aug 2026, 20:01
10,818
-137
9 Aug 2026, 20:21
10,955
+262
8 Aug 2026, 18:31
10,693
+84
7 Aug 2026, 17:37
10,609
+5
6 Aug 2026, 17:20
10,604
+4
6 Aug 2026, 03:30
10,600
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:24
10,600
first reading
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.7%
avg views ÷ 10,743 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,300
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
31 (2 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
102,190
Reactions total
11,812
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈17,600
Videos
≈883
Links
≈448
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,321 reactions across 27 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,402
52.3%
custom 5388820759630084458
2,549
24.7%
custom 5321234454180557476
990
9.59%
💋
854
8.27%
💔
526
5.10%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,812reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
3.23%
1 of 31 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,090
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,430
over 30 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Ranynpn7t7
1
10 August 2026
10 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
несколько дней назад мне написала керамистка, чьими работами я восхищаюсь, и сказала, что хочет отправить нам с Родей подарок в честь помолвки. я в молчаливом шоке выслала свой адрес и сегодня забрала сюрприз.
это роскошные тарелки с нашими котами и фигурка в виде Лелика на моем отжатом стуле (умираю от смеха от его вида). не передать как я счастлива такому сюрпризу!
сделано этими ручками 🤍
потянуло на триллеры, хотя они редко бывают хороши. этот в целом не стал исключением.
описание сюжета:
семья оказывается заперта в доме во время таинственного дождя. и если поначалу надежда на скорое окончание заточения ещё есть, вскоре становится понятно, что запасы нужно беречь, ведь за окном бродят таинственные существа.
фильм можно хвалить за бодрое начало и логичные действия персонажей, но во второй половине н…
недавно жаловалась на дожди, теперь страдаю от жарких дней. единственное, что бодрит и помогает подняться с кровати с утра - жажда холодненького кофе.
я освоила мастерство приготовления cold brew - купила Brazil Mogiana от LEBO. вечером заливаю фильтр пакет с кофе холодной водой, оставляю на 8-12 часов в холодильнике, а с утра готовую базу могу смешать с чем угодно. храниться такой кофе до 7 дней, поэтому заготовки …
а ещё как непослушная невеста за неделю до свадьбы сделала стрижку и окрашивание (не рекомендуют так делать на случай, если что-то пойдет не так). а за день до я иду на маникюр и педикюр 😏
продолжаю показывать штучки, которые мы взяли к свадьбе 🤍
для декора стола помимо ваз с цветами заказали подсвечники и пастельные свечи из Китая. это вышло дешевле, чем такие же варианты с более быстрой доставкой (эти доехали за 2-3 недели). по качеству хорошо, я довольна. и после праздника можно будет украсить дом!
1200 рублей за 12 подсвечников
и 1150 рублей за 12 свечей 🤍
дошли до нового книжного магазина «Озеро» - кажется я нашла идеальный книжный в Москве. наконец пространство, где хочется проводить время, есть много свободного места и собраны действительно интересные издания. я даже несколько себе присмотрела!
#кудапойти 🤍
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @hikkaruru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 195,332 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“сонечка в телеграмме” (@hikkaruru), 10,743 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hikkaruru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
