Channel
@ppiskarev
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,375subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001175907666 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ppiskarev |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ppiskarev |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 13,375 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 13,377 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:21 | 13,382 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 13,385 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 13,391 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 13,389 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 13,389 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
338 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 289 | 85.5% | |
| 👏 | 29 | 8.58% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 4.14% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 1.18% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.592% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 338reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 12 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всегда интересно, кто же именно соберется в этот эгрегор? Неделя настоящей жизни. Концентрат духа на линиях времени … когда-то я выбрал жить именно так, абсолютно честно с собой и как следствие … Коллеги кто уже собирается ехать, из каких городов и стран? Напишите в комментариях, интересно.
❤23
Доброе утро! #ВолшебныеПредметы - это то, что в соответствии со сказочным сюжетом формирует Человека, как Волшебника. #ЗолотоеЗеркало - алгоритм, который позволяет увидеть свое истинное отражение или задать вопрос своему бессознательному, открыть видение Иного, того, что невозможно увидеть прямо… красиво порисовали, интересные личные наблюдения и переживания. Мистично! Коллеги, кто из вас рисовал алгоритм? Подели…
❤45
Мы на Конгрессе Психология XXI -го столетия. Конгресс посвящен 70-ти летию профессора Карпова, декана факультета психологии Ярославского университета. Всегда интересен любой текст от Проф.Козлова, от Карпова, от всех, кто годами точит текст, подбирает слова и определяет смыслы. Спасибо старшим!
❤45👏22👍14🤩1
С Днём Победы!!!
❤96👏5🤩3😍2
Май. Сила личности и творчество. Дорогие, приближается важная дата - 9 Мая. День, который много значит для нашей страны, для памяти и силы народа. Май - время говорить о силе личности: о способности действовать, держать внутреннюю вертикаль, пробуждать волю. Путь героя начинается внутри - в работе с собой, своим телом, эмоциями, профессией, смыслом и творчеством. Приглашаю вас к просмотру. Павел Пискарёв #Архитект…
❤18👏2
#НейроГрафикаРаботает рисую сильно больше чем успеваю выкладывать в сеть. Соответсвенно происходят все более важные и значимые события на те темы, которые прокачиваю. Это касается и Института и участия в организации жизни Коучей в стране и кое-что открывается, придумывается, требует оформления. + 2 статей научных вытачиваю в слова (самый кропотливый труд, кстати) … Здесь 2 работы из модуля #Композиция. Одна работа +…
❤21
Интенсив «БЕЛЫЕ НОЧИ»: что чувствует участник внутри процесса. Денис Полуэктов делится своими впечатлениями от прохождения интенсива «Белые ночи» в Петербурге. "Процесс идёт потоком, тело просыпается, страхи уходят, энергия приходит, а проекты начинают складываться прямо в пространстве интенсива." С 17 по 24 мая в Санкт-Петербурге. Ждём вас. Подробности и регистрация по ссылке
❤17
Иногда развитие выглядит именно так: красивые люди. живые смыслы. искренние разговоры. Петербург. Белые ночи. И свет, который остаётся внутри... Воспоминания. Фотоархив 2025. Жду встречи с вами в 2026. Регистрация 📅
❤24
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @ppiskarev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 204,714 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Павел Пискарёв | Архитектор развития” (@ppiskarev), 13,375 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ppiskarev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.