Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bored Ape Calls

Channel

Bored Ape Calls

@BoredApe_Calls

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

29,135subscribers

+266 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001684601461
TypeChannel
Username@BoredApe_Calls
DescriptionContact&Chat Room: https://t.me/+GeoNsJIje4Q1Yjc0 Gamble Channel : https://t.me/BoredApeGamble A review channel for low risk proje!
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/BoredApe_Calls

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

27,46631,23129,348.57 August 2026 — 28,869 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,865 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,835 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,796 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,616 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,203 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,006 subscribers13 August 2026 — 27,995 subscribers14 August 2026 — 27,916 subscribers16 August 2026 — 27,827 subscribers17 August 2026 — 27,800 subscribers18 August 2026 — 27,701 subscribers19 August 2026 — 27,580 subscribers20 August 2026 — 27,466 subscribers21 August 2026 — 28,361 subscribers23 August 2026 — 31,231 subscribers24 August 2026 — 31,104 subscribers25 August 2026 — 31,067 subscribers26 August 2026 — 31,023 subscribers27 August 2026 — 30,963 subscribers28 August 2026 — 30,903 subscribers29 August 2026 — 30,760 subscribers30 August 2026 — 30,722 subscribers31 August 2026 — 30,677 subscribers1 September 2026 — 30,531 subscribers2 September 2026 — 30,460 subscribers4 September 2026 — 30,442 subscribers6 September 2026 — 30,307 subscribers10 September 2026 — 30,065 subscribers12 September 2026 — 30,008 subscribers14 September 2026 — 29,972 subscribers15 September 2026 — 29,942 subscribers17 September 2026 — 30,477 subscribers28 September 2026 — 29,135 subscribers29,1357 August 202628 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 53 days, net +266. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,901–31,796 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 18:3829,135-1,342
17 Sept 2026, 20:0130,477+535
15 Sept 2026, 20:1929,942-30
14 Sept 2026, 00:3829,972-36
12 Sept 2026, 06:3830,008-57
10 Sept 2026, 04:1830,065-242
6 Sept 2026, 20:1830,307-135
4 Sept 2026, 04:1630,442-18
2 Sept 2026, 15:5830,460-71
1 Sept 2026, 15:1430,531-146
31 Aug 2026, 13:2730,677-45
30 Aug 2026, 10:0430,722-38
29 Aug 2026, 13:1430,760-143
28 Aug 2026, 10:1730,903-60
27 Aug 2026, 12:3830,963-60
26 Aug 2026, 14:0331,023-44
25 Aug 2026, 13:5331,067-37
24 Aug 2026, 17:0431,104-127
23 Aug 2026, 02:3531,231+2,870
21 Aug 2026, 12:0728,361first reading

Engagement

130 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 29,135 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,240
56 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
56
of 130 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026
Posts held130 (17 July 2026 – 2 October 2026)
Views total181,250
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Oct 2026, 05:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,300
Videos
≈92
Links
≈1,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 06s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

2 Oct 2026, 04:43 UTC≈4,120 viewsread 2 October 2026
Photo

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀

1 Oct 2026, 18:09 UTC≈3,050 viewsread 2 October 2026
Photo

This is a historic sale for NFTs Seedphrase classic CryptoPunk #8348 was sold for 3,000,000 USDC + undisclosed amount. The one and only Punk with 7 traits.

1 Oct 2026, 17:13 UTC≈2,680 viewsread 2 October 2026
Forwarded from @wublockchainenglish

Galaxy: 69.2% of Polymarket Retail Accounts Lose Money, With $338.9M in Aggregate Losses Galaxy Research found that 69.2% of roughly 2.9 million human-paced “retail” accounts on Polymarket’s international platform finished below break-even, with aggregate losses of $338.9 million. The analysis, based on onchain settlement data curated by Stork, showed that 15.2% of accounts did not trade again within 30 days after a…

1 Oct 2026, 17:12 UTC≈3,140 viewsread 2 October 2026

NEAR Intents just suffered a $3.8M exploit🚨 Just 2 days after blocking $50M in attempted swaps linked to the Bitget hacker. What a fcking week for NEAR. Here’s what happened: Today NEAR Intents temporarily suspended its services after discovering a vulnerability involving Omni’s deposit The team says: - $3.8M was lost. - The vulnerability has been patched. - Affected users will be fully compensated. - Security …

1 Oct 2026, 15:20 UTC≈1,630 viewsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Congrats to those of you who listened and got a piece of this Everyone who played on metawin.com last month were auto-entered into this prize competition which paid out $250k to 25 people. if you missed out on it, they're likely running it back again this month and those who start stacking entries now will have a much higher chance of winning by the end of the month when they pick the winners. Metawin are by far t…

1 Oct 2026, 03:14 UTC≈3,540 viewsread 2 October 2026

Why did Metamask write this tweet? https://x.com/metamask/status/2105442300335620460?s=46

28 Sept 2026, 19:06 UTC≈4,620 viewsread 2 October 2026
Photo

I’ll be adding new people to the group today, so if you’d like to join, feel free to send me a request now. I’ll be checking the requests throughout the day and adding people as I go. If you’re interested, don’t miss your chance! https://t.me/+GeoNsJIje4Q1Yjc0

28 Sept 2026, 11:18 UTC≈3,590 viewsread 2 October 2026
Photo

So what is happening with $PONS? PONS went from $0.01 to $0.97 in less than two months. Now it’s trading at 45% below ATH. imo the answer is much more interesting than “PONS is dead.” - $146.3M fees in the last 30 days - $25.2M protocol revenue - $16.2M directed to holders / buybacks - $2.45B DEX volume - $365M mkt cap Let’s also ook at the last seven days. - $25.2M monthly revenue - but only $2.21M in the last…

28 Sept 2026, 10:07 UTC≈2,470 viewsread 2 October 2026
Photo

For the next 2 days, if you deposit & wager on metawin.com you qualify for part of their $1M drop this month and if you use promo code "X100" you can double your first deposit meaning you can wager more and earn more of the drop. You might even get lucky and turn $1 into $12k like this guy did But at a minimum, you earn a share of the $1M whether you win or lose.

26 Sept 2026, 17:57 UTC≈3,400 viewsread 2 October 2026
Photo

$CONDO · 8.9X scan · $480K→$4.3M View scan | Chart | Buy | /p_40e7c39b26

Showing the 12 most recent of 130 posts we hold for @BoredApe_Calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bored Ape Calls” (@BoredApe_Calls), 29,135 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BoredApe_Calls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.