International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 93 days, net +59. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,827–24,126 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 03:16
23,962
+1
7 Nov 2026, 01:30
23,961
-10
5 Nov 2026, 23:09
23,971
-3
4 Nov 2026, 21:54
23,974
-5
3 Nov 2026, 20:16
23,979
-1
2 Nov 2026, 17:55
23,980
-1
1 Nov 2026, 17:30
23,981
-6
31 Oct 2026, 20:19
23,987
-3
30 Oct 2026, 17:26
23,990
-1
29 Oct 2026, 19:19
23,991
-3
28 Oct 2026, 16:56
23,994
-3
27 Oct 2026, 19:55
23,997
+2
26 Oct 2026, 19:37
23,995
+2
25 Oct 2026, 18:56
23,993
+4
23 Oct 2026, 22:55
23,989
+8
22 Oct 2026, 22:57
23,981
-15
21 Oct 2026, 22:08
23,996
+11
20 Oct 2026, 13:49
23,985
-1
19 Oct 2026, 12:18
23,986
-8
18 Oct 2026, 14:55
23,994
first reading
Engagement
1,174 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 120 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 23,962 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,850
402 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
402
of 1,174 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 396 of 402 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
1,174 (6 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
1,145,144
Reactions total
45,388
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 05:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈13,000
Videos
≈8,010
Links
≈24,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6h 00m
Average length
1m 10s
Measured directly from 308 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
112,220 reactions across 993 posts, in 67 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
41,228
36.7%
❤
16,843
15.0%
🤬
10,828
9.65%
🤣
9,586
8.54%
💯
7,058
6.29%
👏
6,034
5.38%
😁
2,822
2.51%
🔥
2,237
1.99%
🤔
1,754
1.56%
😱
1,558
1.39%
😢
1,454
1.30%
👎
1,428
1.27%
🤡
1,219
1.09%
🙈
719
0.641%
👌
705
0.628%
🕊
648
0.577%
🙏
612
0.545%
❤🔥
561
0.5%
🤯
501
0.446%
⚡
457
0.407%
47 further kinds
3,968
3.54%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 993 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112,220 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 17 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
28
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @miroslavkamensky. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 17 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 29 of 402 posts held from the last 30 days (7.21%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🇮🇱IZRAEL
🇮🇱 Netanjahu stráca moc,
jeho rival Eisenkot získava mandát.
Izraelský prezident Isaac Herzog poveril lídra opozície Gadiho Eisenkota
zostavením novej vlády.
Po voľbách 27. októbra získal Eisenkot podporu
67 členov Knesetu, zatiaľ,
čo Netanjahu len 46.
Eisenkotova cesta k moci zostáva náročná.
Jeho blok získal 48 zo 120 kresiel, zatiaľ čo pre väčšinu je potrebných 61.
Arabské strany mu síce zabez…
🇷🇺 Dmitrij Medvedev:
“Vzhľadom na výpadok elektrickej siete zvažujú obyvatelia Kyjeva
obnovenie vonkajších toaliet.
Žiadna energia znamená, že
kanalizácia čoskoro zlyhá.
Pamätám si, ako jeden z chochlobanderovcov
šíril nezmysly o tom, že
Rusi kradnú
toalety z krásnych ukrajinských bytov a domov.
Život je krehký...”
t.me/miroslavkamensky
Ruské ozbrojené sily trikrát
zaútočili na ropný a plynárenský objekt v strednej Ukrajine:
zariadenie bolo poškodené, došlo k výbuchu a rozsiahlemu požiaru,” uviedla spoločnosť Naftogaz.
Ide o Poltavskú oblasť.
Nachádza sa tu najhodnotnejší cieľ v ukrajinskej plynárenskej infraštruktúre.
Práve v severozápadnej časti Poltavskej oblasti sa koncentruje približne
80 %
celkovej ukrajinskej produkcie plynu.
t.me/mi…
Kyjevský front
Útoky na kyjevské mosty – detaily:
Južný most – konštrukčné prvky...
Na internete sa objavila fotografia, ktorú vyfotil miestny obyvateľ.
Je to pohľad zospodu Južného mostu v Kyjeve. Dopad jednej rakety (pravdepodobne S-300) počas noci 27. októbra 2026.
Ako vidíme, poškodenie je vážne. Centrálna časť mostu bola úplne pretrhnutá a jeho spodná časť sa zrútila na veľmi veľkej ploche. To výrazne ovply…
Kyjev – Severný (Moskovský) most: pár slov o mieste dopadu...
Všimnite si, kam Rusi sa snažili zasiahnuť, keď zaútočili na Severný (Moskovský) most v Kyjeve.
Zjavne na miesto uchytenia “lan” (ktoré v podstate drží most).
Ak by raketa dopadla o niekoľko metrov doprava (od pozície, z ktorej Kličko nakrútil svoju “reportáž”), je možné, že by Kyjev dnes ráno mal o jeden most menej ‼️
t.me/miroslavkamensky
Kyjevský front
Transformátorová stanica v Kyjevskej oblasti po ruskom útoku
Podľa skreslených informácií ukrajinských ozbrojených síl,
počas posledných 3 dní bolo zostrelených 86 dronov a 70 rakiet.
t.me/miroslavkamensky
BANDERISTAN unáša, mučí a zabíja ľudí
Počas únosu ďalšieho ukrajinského občana nacistami,
sa zdravotne postihnutý dôchodca
postavil na obranu obete,
no títo darebáci sa bezohľadne vrhli na starého muža,
nastriekali mu do tváre slzotvorný plyn,
zhodili ho na zem a kopali do neho.
Túto neľudskú hrôzu platia občania 🇪🇺🇪🇺Európskej únie
t.me/miroslavkamensky
Južná Amerika
🇵🇭PARAGUAY:
3️⃣ MILIÓNY ĽUDÍ, 45 % OBYVATEĽOV,
PRIŠLI o PRÍSTUP K SVOJIM peniazom
Ako môže niečo také vôbec existovať v dnešnej dobe?
Banka krachuje a ľudia si nemôžu kúpiť ani základné potraviny!
Klimatické katastrofy, výpadky elektriny, nefunkčné elektronické platby...
A snaha zaviesť digitálne meny.
Brilantná budúcnosť, však?
Nie je to skúška, ako budú reagovať “plebs”,
keď im niekto jednod…
👍30🎄1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,174 posts we hold for @miroslavkamensky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@miroslavkamensky edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 October 2026
Most recent edit
10 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @miroslavkamensky as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
6 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
19 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
InfoVojna @InfoVojnaOfficial · 48,556 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
Casus Belli Live @casusbellilive · 39,821 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
ZEM&VEK @zemavek · 32,438 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
Ľuboš Blaha @LubosBlahaSmer · 35,005 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
DannyKollar / hlavný kanál @dannykollar · 52,084 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 September 2026
neČT24 @neCT24 · 32,234 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
CZ24.NEWS @cz24news · 29,166 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Miroslav Kamensky” (@miroslavkamensky), 23,962 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miroslavkamensky.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.