Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

may.crypto {🦅}

@maycrypto

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,514subscribers

-44 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001517285523
TypeChannel
Username@maycrypto
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/maycrypto

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@maycrypto/9026 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC@may_crypto/50545 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC1.00under a minute
@maycrypto/9036 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC@may_crypto/50646 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC1.00under a minute
@maycrypto/9038 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC@may_crypto/50676 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC1.00under a minute
@maycrypto/9039 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC@may_crypto/50696 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@maycrypto/9042 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC@may_crypto/50737 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC1.00under a minute
@maycrypto/9043 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC@may_crypto/50747 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@may_crypto7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (61)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @maycrypto — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

17,51417,55817,5366 August 2026 — 17,558 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,549 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,546 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,537 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,523 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,527 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,515 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,514 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,507–17,565 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:5517,514-1
12 Aug 2026, 01:5817,515-12
11 Aug 2026, 01:0817,527+4
10 Aug 2026, 03:4117,523-14
9 Aug 2026, 04:1117,537-9
8 Aug 2026, 05:5817,546-3
7 Aug 2026, 03:5117,549-9
6 Aug 2026, 06:1817,558first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.3%
avg views ÷ 17,514 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,020
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
50
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held50 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total151,070
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
55s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 12 August 2026

люди НЕ РАВНЫ. дальше это будет еще заметнее. деньги, интеллект, связи, красота, характер, происхожление, связи, удача. всё это определяло, какое место челвоек занимает в иерархии. теперь появился еще один фактор: насколько хорошо ты умеешь пользоваться ai. и вот он мне нравится особенно) потому что это буквально frauding - человек с IQ 80 (типа меня) может стать сильнее огромного количества людей, которые скип

Signed https://may

11 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC≈2,230 viewsread 12 August 2026

вот это прочитайте. люди взяли ai, внедрили его в свою жизнь, заработали ТОННУ кэша, выигрывают в конкурентной гонке и явно чувствуют свое высокое положение в обществе. меня тоже разрывает от желания рассказать, ЧТО и СКОЛЬКО мне дало ai, но оставим это на потом, через год-два… 👇обязательно к прочтению https://teletype.in/@shtanga0x/ai-native

Signed https://may

11 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC≈2,550 viewsread 12 August 2026

миллениалы: крипта зумеры: ai ???: крипта + ai

Signed https://may

11 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC≈2,740 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

техно - музыка успеха

Signed https://may

11 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC≈2,850 viewsread 12 August 2026

почему я об этом пишу? потому что на пути к успеху находились люди, которые хотели меня УНИЧТОЖИТЬ, морально сломать, напакостничать, привить вину, внушить пораженческие мысли, опустить до своего уровня. при этом они не получали с этого выгоду. то же самое было с другими людьми. я знаю СОТНИ талантливых, умных и перспективных людей, которые сломались под гнётом гойского давления. ТЫ ЛОХ, если сложишь руки из-за то

Signed https://may

11 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC≈2,780 viewsread 12 August 2026

как всегда СНГ разъебывает друг друга в твиттере за бейджи и должности, не получая никакой выгоды с этого. ведро с крабами as is

Signed https://may

10 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC≈3,090 viewsread 12 August 2026

иду через частный сектор. стоит парень, зовет меня, просит вызвать такси, т.к села зарядка, разговорились. он пробует себя в новой нише - косит газоны триммером. средний доход в день ~8к, заказов много и это он еще на авито объявление не выставил. город 130к населения

Signed https://may

10 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC≈3,080 viewsread 12 August 2026

кому нужен марафон ИИ 6.0 > инфлам и желающим двигаться в медийке, чтобы развивать свои соцсети, апать ранг кол-вом пдп, качать ауру контентом, собирать вокруг себя коммьюнити/секту и нарабатывать связи. > офисным работникам. к моей маме щас ходят на поклон коллеги, ей повысили ЗП и она работает меньше потому что я научил ее нейронкам. > безработным, чтобы наконец начать гриндить нормальный кэш на интересных темка

Signed https://may

10 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC≈3,090 viewsread 12 August 2026

в 2026 нейросети умные из коробки, но даже это всего лишь 5% от их функционала и возможностей

Signed https://may

10 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC≈3,250 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

когда скипнул марафон ИИ 6.0

Signed https://may

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @maycrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 74,815 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

одиссея kekius maximus
@doge1 · 679,326
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“may.crypto {🦅}” (@maycrypto), 17,514 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maycrypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.