Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Киса | Deploy la Deploy

@deployladeploy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,200subscribers

+298 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001729986345
TypeChannel
Username@deployladeploy
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/deployladeploy

Growth

6,9027,2007,0516 August 2026 — 6,902 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,912 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,947 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,200 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +298. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,857–7,245 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:367,200+253
9 Aug 2026, 13:016,947+35
6 Aug 2026, 17:416,912+10
6 Aug 2026, 09:186,902first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.0%
avg views ÷ 7,200 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,020
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held41 (1 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total82,650
Reactions total1,595
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 35s
Average length
3m 35s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,595 reactions across 41 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥37723.6%
👍34521.6%
😁31920.0%
custom 54070398691657876521589.91%
custom 54069761275561471701438.97%
custom 54070907645282437081428.90%
🐳1116.96%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,595reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 41 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @deployladeploy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC≈1,230 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Приветики! Я благодарен всем, кто шильнул меня и вижу как резко пришло много новых людей. Вас со мной и моим контентом я познакомлю уже завтра, а пока микро-микро анонсик. У себя в твиттере я отдельно пишу про AI, типо быстрый щипост апдейтов моих проектов или микро гайды. И буду благодарен, если вы поможете мне развить еще и западное направление, чтобы больше качать мой гитхаб и я делал больше полезных тулзов.

🔥9custom 54069761275561471702👍1😁1custom 54070398691657876521

11 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC≈1,630 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

КАК Я ЗАРАБАТЫВАЮ НА (много) ХЛЕБ Мы собрались с легендами крипто СНГ медийки и рынка, такими как Макс Вайлд и присосавшимися к его величию. И каждый, разумеется без всяких шуток, смог внедрить AI в свой личный доходный бизнес, мувы криптанские или вообще пойти зарабатывать на дрочерах в интернете. ЖМИ СЮДА ЧТОБ ЧИТАТЬ ДА-ДА, ВОТ СЮДА НАЖМИ СУКА, ТЫ ЧЕ КУРСОРОМ МАЖЕШЬ?! В этой статье не просто "расскажи о том, чт

👍25🔥6custom 54069761275561471702custom 54070398691657876522🐳1😁1custom 54070907645282437081

11 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC≈1,970 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

КАК Я ПОДСТРИГСЯ НА 6 МИНУТ МОТИВЭЙШЕНА ЛЮТОГО

custom 540703986916578765221👍6🐳4custom 54070907645282437083😁2🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC≈1,740 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Апдейтики на гитхаб: взломы, фиксы и плюшки Небольшой тебе микро-дайджест и тому, что случилось в моих репозиториях Если вы все еще почему-то НЕ пользовались моими вайбкод разработками, а с недавнего времени частично кодерскими (спасибо Александру), то бегом-бегом по ссылками. Подписывайтесь на меня на гитхабе и в твиттере, чтобы быть в курсе всех событий связанных с моей котожопой. 1. choirboy-prompt В целях ва

🔥12🐳3👍3😁2custom 54069761275561471702custom 54070907645282437082custom 54070398691657876521

11 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC≈1,700 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026

AI агенты поражают порой. У них всегда была беда с юмором и +- человечным общением. Лучше Opus 4.6 я не встречал ничего. ГПТ стал в разы лучше, но все еще крайне странный. И вот тут я в чате придумал тупой каламбур: "Этот глупый агент не понимает мечту мальчика вайбкодера" после инфы о новом сбросе в Codex. Ну и подумалось мне, пойду попрошу клод тян сделать подобные переделки названий аниме. С парочки я прям орну

😁24custom 54070907645282437088custom 54069761275561471703

11 Aug 2026, 04:38 UTC≈1,710 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Доброе утро. Щас сажусь делать множество мелких и менее мелких фиксов по вашим заявкам. А пока агент работает я буду в три горла жрать свою магию утра. Рис и морской капустой и яйцом. Ну и кофеек. А у тебя че как дела, другалек?

👍18🔥9😁4

10 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC≈1,710 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ты тоже можешь быть дрочером А ну.. вернее сказать вайбкодером. И если ты уже вайбкодер (подписан на мой канал) то есть маленький моментик. Вайбкодером считаться должен тот, кто вайбкодит. Но в среднем тот, кто занят иишками. Логично, неправда ли? Есть люди, которые читают мой канал из интереса простого, кто-то немного теряется в моем авторском щитпосте. Такие наверное вообще плохо понимают почему у вайбкодеров н

👍13🔥4😁3custom 54070398691657876523

10 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,750 views28 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Наконец-то я выделил время чисто под генерации А то я то воркаю, то контент пилю, то дома убираюсь, то ухожу на 20 тыщ шагов ходить кругами. Помниться, что не малая доля моей аудитории, даже и просто знакомых, удивляются подобным фотокарточкам. А мне хочется впечатлять и вас. Все что вы видите перед глазами это 100% AI. И мои чатерсы знают, какие пикантные снимки можно увидеть в чатике канала. Сделано из одного т

🔥13custom 54070398691657876526😁5👍2custom 54069761275561471702

10 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC≈1,900 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Любой осьминог это вайбкодер Если эта мысль вам кажется бредовой или непонятной, то просто внимательно вдумайтесь в принцип устройства его тела, а точнее его управления. Две трети всех нервных клеток осьминога находятся в его щупальцах. Они называются ганглии и развиты на столько, что работают аналогично нейронным связям мозга. Из-за этого мозг самого осьминога шлет лишь общие команды, а их обработка и выполнение

😁42🐳8🔥6👍1custom 54070398691657876521

9 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC≈2,070 views17 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Русской культуры тред Проснулся в 5 утра и глаза красные. Это я плакал о России. Вот и решилось мне с вами немного задать вайбика. В комменты скиньте от 1 до 4х треков в любом жанре, но от разных авторов, которые на ваш взгляд идеально описывают русскую душу, культуру и быт. Это может быть о русской хтони, могут быть угарные панковские треки. Это может быть что-то около политичное. Или просто что-то понятное всем

👍8😁5🔥2custom 54069761275561471701custom 54070907645282437081

8 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC≈2,210 views87 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Хуй.

custom 540697612755614717053🐳12custom 540703986916578765210👍3🔥3😁3custom 54070907645282437083

8 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC≈2,280 views75 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ради таких реакций я работаю каждый день Вернее сказать, меня просто прет делать контент, закидывать приколы и билдить полезные утилиты для вас. Однако, я совру если скажу, что мне похуй на позитивный фидбек. Нет конечно же. Я радуюсь как ребенок и мне очень-очень приятно! Я тоже вас очинь люблю пон. Вы прекрасная аудитория <3

🐳38custom 540697612755614717017custom 540709076452824370811🔥4👍2😁2custom 54070398691657876521

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @deployladeploy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 10,842 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 33 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Киса | Deploy la Deploy” (@deployladeploy), 7,200 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deployladeploy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.