Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

vimol: Web3

@vimol_web3

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,859subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001891967946
TypeChannel
Username@vimol_web3
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vimol_web3

Growth

3,8593,8803,869.56 August 2026 — 3,880 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,876 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,867 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,859 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,856–3,883 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:153,859-8
10 Aug 2026, 12:523,867-9
7 Aug 2026, 04:523,876-4
6 Aug 2026, 09:183,880first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 30 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.1%
avg views ÷ 3,859 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,660
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held21 (30 April 20266 August 2026)
Views total8,309
Reactions total111
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

667 reactions across 21 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥24737.0%
👍22433.6%
🔥9914.8%
😁446.60%
custom 5942829115127106836284.20%
👾253.75%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 667reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
131
across the posts below
Posts paid on
21
of 21 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vimol_web3. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 April 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC749 views18 reactions7 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ИИ-МОНТАЖЁР НА GITHUB 😔 Я тут опять залип на гитхабе. Нашёл FreeCut — open-source видеоредактор, который работает прямо в браузере. Если кратко - это тулза, которая позволяет вашему ИИ-агенту монтировать видео как профессиональный монтажёр. Схема простая: ты описываешь, что нужно сделать с видео → агент правит проект → рендерит → смотрит результат → двигается дальше. Без API-ключей, без подписок и без лимитов. Э

👍9🔥5❤‍🔥2👾1custom 59428291151271068361

3 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC≈1,400 views14 reactions8 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

AXIS ROBOTICS | РОБОТЫ И ПОИНТЫ Давно не писал про новые проекты, но тут решил сделать исключение. Попался Axis Robotics — проект на стыке AI, роботов и крипты. Причем не в формате “мы прикрутили AI к лендингу”, а с нормальной механикой для активности. На прошлой недели они анонсировали раунд на $12M, а уже сегодня у них запустилась система поинтов. ➡️ Суть простая: • Заходишь в браузер • Управляешь роботом в си

👍8🔥2❤‍🔥1👾1😁1custom 59428291151271068361

28 Jul 2026, 17:35 UTC≈1,530 views22 reactions7 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нейрокомментинг | Вводный пост 🥸 Что-то я сильно разленился, 20 дней уже прошло с момента первого поста по нейрокомментингу. Ну и у меня были на то веские причины, большой переезд, и спустя полтора года я вернулся в свой родной город. Ну сейчас не об этом. Я полностью доделал софт, уже запускал его тестово, и все пока что гладко: без блокировок, комментарии действительно похожи на живого человека. Я собрал такой

❤‍🔥11🔥4👍3😁2👾1custom 59428291151271068361

20 Jul 2026, 10:00 UTC≈2,090 views12 reactions7 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

AIGATE — 50+ AI-МОДЕЛЕЙ В ОДНОМ API Если вы постоянно прыгаете между OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek и прочими моделями — рано или поздно начинаешь считать не модели, а сколько денег они сжирают на запросах. И вот для этого как раз AIGate и нужен: на некоторых моделях цена может быть до 80% ниже, чем через официальный API. А если у тебя много повторяющихся запросов — кэширование ещё сильнее режет расход. По сути

👍5🔥3❤‍🔥1👾1😁1custom 59428291151271068361

17 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC≈2,540 views45 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚘 ПРОМПТЫ ДЛЯ CLAUDE CODE Думал, что после релиза своего бота под промпты я вообще закрыл для себя эту тему. Но тут прямо апдейт, который грех не показать. Листал сегодня твиттер, и наткнулся на вот это — code.claude.com/docs/en/prompt-library Библиотека готовых промптов прямо от самих Anthropic. Если честно, ни у кого еще пост про это не видел, могу ошибаться, но все же решил закинуть первым, пока не протухло. К

❤‍🔥35🔥3👍2😁2custom 59428291151271068362👾1

11 Jul 2026, 11:21 UTC≈2,510 views25 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026

НЕЙРОНКИ ПО ЦЕНЕ КОФФЕ Речь пойдет о магазине @apel0sin_market_bot. И там реально смешные цены: ❤️ Gemini Pro 18 мес - 1.4$ 😶 Super Grok 12 мес - 20$ ❤️ Chat GPT Plus Edu 12 мес - 19$ Оплата есть через СБП, крипту и CryptoBot. Большая часть выдачи автоматическая, поэтому не нужно долго ждать ручной обработки • Отзывы • Их канал, там промокоды на деньги Я сам закупился большой пачкой аккаунтов, подарю родственник

❤‍🔥15🔥5custom 59428291151271068362👍1👾1😁1

6 Jul 2026, 12:20 UTC≈2,460 views78 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нейрокоментинг | Новый источник трафика Начну с небольшой предыстории, 3 месяца назад я познакомился с человеком, который с помощью нейрокоментинга перегоняет в свой канал по 50-150 человек в день. И тогда я максимально отвергал эту идею, и не верил в такие цифры. Спустя еще полтора месяца, я увидел как его канал с 2500 ПДП вырос до 6000. И как раз тогда и появились мысли, а почему бы и нет. Нейрокоментинг - я бы

👍54🔥11😁6custom 59428291151271068365❤‍🔥1👾1

29 Jun 2026, 17:52 UTC≈2,760 views19 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

НАШЁЛ РЕПО, КОТОРОЕ УЧИТ AI-АГЕНТА НЕ ПЕРЕУСЛОЖНЯТЬ ПРОСТОЙ КОД Одна из самых главных проблем в AI-кодинге — просишь мелкую фичу, а агент тащит новую либу, лепит абстракции и пишет 80 строк там, где хватало одной. И с такой проблемой я сталкивался неоднократно, и уже думал делать агента-ревьювера, который будет взаимодействовать с основным агентом, перед написанием любого кода. Но когда начал серчить эту тему, уже

👍14❤‍🔥1👾1🔥1😁1custom 59428291151271068361

17 Jun 2026, 13:56 UTC≈3,260 views21 reactions7 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ЛУЧШИЕ ПОСТЫ ЗА ПОСЛЕДНЕЕ ВРЕМЯ За последние несколько месяцев в моем канале накопилось много полезных постов. Поэтому решил собрать небольшой навигатор в одном посте. TT-ФЕРМА / HERMES / БОТЫ / OBSIDIAN и др Разделю каждую тему по блокам, и внутри каждого блока будут посты связанные с конкретной темой. 1. ТТ-ФЕРМА: ПОЛНАЯ АВТОМАТИЗАЦИЯ ТРАФИКА • Вводный пост, рассказал как все работает • Пост с анонсом бота по

👍10❤‍🔥3👾3😁3🔥1custom 59428291151271068361

12 Jun 2026, 14:29 UTC≈3,150 views20 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ФЕРМА TIKTOK: Как вставить ссылку без 1000 подписчиков ? Да, это одна из главных проблем для новичков. TikTok не даёт просто так вставить ссылку на любую платформу, пока на аккаунте нет 1000 подписчиков. А если ты ведёшь целую ферму, то раскрутить даже 1 аккаунт до 1000 пдп — спокойно может занять пару месяцев. • В арбитраже трафика всем нужны быстрые деньги. Поэтому самый первый вопрос, который встаёт у любого, к

❤‍🔥10👍4🔥3👾1😁1custom 59428291151271068361

5 Jun 2026, 12:08 UTC≈3,010 views30 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

МОНЕТИЗИРУЕМ НАВЫК ВАЙБКОДИНГА 😯 Речь пойдёт о хакатоне от Mantle, и это не та история, где идут просто “ради опыта”. Тут уже есть реальный призовой фонд, за который вполне имеет смысл побороться: • $120K кэшем • $103K в API-кредитах • $9K гранд-при • 6 треков с выплатой по $8.5K за 1 место • ещё $20K просто раскидают 20 финалистам за деплой То есть даже без победы там вполне можно отбить своё время. ➡️ Вот катег

👍19🔥4❤‍🔥3😁2👾1custom 59428291151271068361

4 Jun 2026, 16:33 UTC≈2,620 views21 reactions12 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ФЕРМА TIKTOK: Мой финальный стэк Перепробовал наверное все альтернативы, Depp-Research от Perplexity выдал большое количество всех возможных расходников: эмуляторы/ антики / прокси / vpn-ы/ селлеры и тд... Я тестил и самое дешевое, и самое дорогое, и в этом посте честно распишу, где вообще есть смысл переплачивать, а где наоборот стоит сэкономить. 1. Антик — PhoneGrid А точнее сервис облачных телефонов, пробовал

👍12👾3❤‍🔥2🔥2😁1custom 59428291151271068361

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @vimol_web3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 215,895 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“vimol: Web3” (@vimol_web3), 3,859 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vimol_web3.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.