Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for may crypto {🦅} | Мэй Крипто

Channel

may crypto {🦅} | Мэй Крипто

@may_crypto

On this record: Topic · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

907subscribers

-109 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002213438116
TypeChannel
Username@may_crypto
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/may_crypto

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

9071,040973.57 August 2026 — 1,016 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,016 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,015 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,011 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,008 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,040 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,039 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,036 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,032 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,028 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,027 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,014 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,010 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,005 subscribers30 September 2026 — 1,001 subscribers7 October 2026 — 1,002 subscribers16 October 2026 — 999 subscribers23 October 2026 — 971 subscribers29 October 2026 — 968 subscribers6 November 2026 — 965 subscribers14 November 2026 — 907 subscribers7 August 202614 November 2026
21 measurements spanning 99 days, net -109. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 887–1,060 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 01:44907-58
6 Nov 2026, 05:50965-3
29 Oct 2026, 20:49968-3
23 Oct 2026, 00:31971-28
16 Oct 2026, 12:18999-3
7 Oct 2026, 10:181,002+1
30 Sept 2026, 20:171,001-4
16 Sept 2026, 08:151,005-5
12 Sept 2026, 09:591,010-4
8 Sept 2026, 12:171,014-13
2 Sept 2026, 22:161,027-1
30 Aug 2026, 11:541,028-4
27 Aug 2026, 16:171,032-4
24 Aug 2026, 11:431,036-3
21 Aug 2026, 03:561,039-1
18 Aug 2026, 10:341,040+32
15 Aug 2026, 00:251,008-3
11 Aug 2026, 11:351,011-4
8 Aug 2026, 08:051,015-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:321,016first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
28s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,657 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🎉16610.0%
❤1649.90%
🔥1629.78%
👏1498.99%
👍1338.03%
🍓1227.36%
🥰1187.12%
🍾1156.94%
🤩1126.76%
🌭1056.34%
💯845.07%
🆒784.71%
🐳754.53%
🗿744.47%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,657 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC160 views94 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

и я ведь этого достоин

🎉46🥰13💯10👍9🔥9🌭7

7 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC162 views97 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

аи-агенты итоги

❤51🍾11🎉10🔥10👏8👍7

7 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC163 views51 reactionsread 8 August 2026

конкурентам должно быть плохо с того, насколько ты много и стабильно воркаешь, а клиенты должны радоваться, потому что имеют дело с ТОБОЙ

💯11🔥11🗿10❤7🌭7👍5

7 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC163 views98 reactionsread 8 August 2026

конкурентам должно быть плохо с того, насколько ты много и стабильно воркаешь, а клиенты должны радоваться, потому что имеют дело с ТОБОЙ

🍓53🗿13🍾10👏8👍7🥰7

7 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC164 views117 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

погодите это реально? погодите это реально?

👍49🎉16🐳15🌭14🔥13🗿10

7 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC164 views100 reactionsread 8 August 2026

я сглупил потому что уехал в деревню не форкнул агента по ведению X с ПК на макбук. там у меня агент по генерации контента, который делает четкие посты за 5-15 минут по фирменной методичке. главные фичи: - сегментация по темату - направление (смарт, вирал) - очистка ai-паттернов - polymarket research - анализ конкурентов - проактивность после такого просто открыть claude в вебе и попросить написать пост выглядит …

🌭51👍14🥰13❤9👏7🆒6

7 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC164 views88 reactionsread 8 August 2026

щас в X заваривается сочная тема - kalshi развивают свои перпы и платят по $150 за реферала (еще по слухам официально 30% с комиссии) ссылку берите на Kaito. кто хотел качать X - сейчас самое время чтобы начать, думаю с осени оч вкусные профиты начнут идти

🐳42👏16🌭8🥰8🔥7🗿7

7 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC164 views88 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

claude code итоги

💯34🍓13🤩12👏11🐳10🥰8

6 Aug 2026, 21:55 UTC165 views95 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👏55👍13🥰9🐳8🍓5🗿5

6 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC165 views51 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤12🔥11🍓8🎉8🥰7🤩5

6 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC166 views96 reactionsread 8 August 2026

вот эта мразь!!! не записалась на марафон ИИ 6.0. я второй день не могу расслабиться и просто жить. постоянно загоняюсь - не продолжит ли она все делать руками? не сожрут ли ее конкуренты? не останется ли мучительно наблюдать, как люди зарабатывают с помощью ai? о, нашел! теперь покупай👇 https://marathonai.ru

🎉46👏16🍓10🆒10❤8🔥6

6 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC165 views90 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

забавный факт… она кстати живет у меня 23 года уже

🆒43👍13🎉11🍾10👏7🗿6

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @may_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“may crypto {🦅} | Мэй Крипто” (@may_crypto), 907 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/may_crypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.