庆祝频道人数142k 给大家发一个红包
👍6

Channel
@luoyeop
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
142,969subscribers
-46 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001678849424 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @luoyeop |
| Description | 广告联系 @luoyebay 同频道主 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/luoyeop |
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 142,969 | -46 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:31 | 143,015 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (13 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,411 |
| Reactions total | 172 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 03:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
172 reactions across 22 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 168 | 97.7% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 1.74% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.581% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 172reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
庆祝频道人数142k 给大家发一个红包
👍6
💰 转账给你 23.89 U 请在24小时内领取
👍7
✅频道主推荐 TG最全soso资源搜索群🔍 免费开户 千元红包 免费数据号 公益内核 破解美化 免费看篇 八卦吃瓜 抖音热搜…… 🥰点击下方按钮加入即可搜索🥰
👍9
庆祝频道人数142k 给大家发一个红包
🎉🧧红包发送成功🧧🎉 ✔️达利客服-娜娜 发送了一个红包 💵总金额: 5888 U💰 📊 剩余: 188/398 🥇 76.88 USDT - nbns 🥈 56.10 USDT - 不凡 🥉 55.95 USDT - 辣椒免费公益
庆祝频道人数142k 给大家发一个红包
👍3
🧧@WIKIktbot🎰恭喜发财!马到成功!🧧 🕴达利担保发了个70000RMB💰的拼手气红包,剩余红包个数286/288 大家快来抢! 🏆584.01RMB💰(19:14:40-用户***凡) 🏅476.07RMB💰(05:47:42-用户***宇) 🥫469.56RMB💰(01:06:34-用户***懂我) 🧧466.20RMB💰(01:10:39-用户***赁】) 🧧465.29RMB💰(01:08:11-用户***姣-)
👍3
🔤🔤🔤🔤黑盒已公益 全网独一家 ⬇️手机号定位 ⬇️支付宝码反 ❄️补齐身份证/手机号 ❄️个人大头 🛡手机号反姓名 🛡v反/Q反三件套 🖥刑侦全户 🖥短信轰炸 📱无违规永久思路 🛰️无违规概率永久思路 新增几个功能:ai脱换衣,破解梯子大全,酒店摄像直播,照片人脸扫描,精准模糊猎魔... 点我进入频道获取卡密 点我进入频道获取卡密
👍3
❗️❗️soso搜索资源群 🥰 🥰🥰🥰 🥰🥰🥰 ✅频道主推荐 TG最全soso资源搜索群🔍 https://t.me/+HW1WlJwttZhjMjBl https://t.me/+HW1WlJwttZhjMjBl 🥰点击链接加入🥰
👍5
Signed hoh .
落叶公益 pinned a file
爱玩系列全系公益内核启动器3.9 1.增加cfm手游内核绘制 CFM介绍如下: 方框绘制,陀螺仪自瞄。默认解密坐标 当加密了自动会使用解密坐标。如果还是没效果就可以考虑是不是被强标了。这游戏不同机型不同的加密。解密纯换其他链条读取, 辅助不动任何内存, 自瞄为陀螺仪自瞄(跟其他游戏一样,打开游戏陀螺仪,灵敏度就是自瞄速度。如果出现不自瞄反而往外推就把游戏陀螺仪XY轴反转打开就行了) 2.经过测试爆破换边后会没效果,目前暂时没解决,少玩局内换边模式即可。其他模式没遇到。 内置 1.lolm 2.无畏契约 3.失控进化 4.和平精英 5.cfm 集成多款爱玩系列辅助,只是一个启动器,本质还是内核,不影响稳定性 内置 1.lolm 2.无畏契约 3.失控进化 4.和平精英 5.cfm 全部都为内核,需给启动器root权限,才可以正常使用。 内置解密全都为算法解密,不动内存 具体辅助驱动请查看历史记录找到对应游戏的压缩包里有对应驱动下…
👍11❤1
Signed hoh .
🚀 New Update #Game和平 Game和平 Update: ✔️解决自瞄移动跳频问题 ✔️过滤掉无人机的空投箱子 ✔️解决异常卡顿问题 公益卡密:@luoyenb521 更新网盘: https://wwbll.lanzoul.com/b0188jmrwj 密码:6666 tips:可以一键获取配置,还有一些其他的可玩性功能你们可以自行研究如迫击炮落点 落叶数据号 luoye.chyidc.cn/shop/luoye 频道 @luoyenb521
👍11
Signed 陪我久一点
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @luoyeop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 901,224 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“落叶公益” (@luoyeop), 142,969 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luoyeop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.