评论送AORUS/GWTO/疾风卡密活动进行中!!! 活动链接: https://t.me/QYSJZFZ/843 评论完假卡/不给钱全家出门被车撞死!!!
👍4

Channel
@QYSJZFZ
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
11,523subscribers
+1,084 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1003847814328 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @QYSJZFZ |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/QYSJZFZ |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 11,523 | +105 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 11,418 | +75 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 11,343 | +425 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 10,918 | +260 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 10,658 | +5 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:22 | 10,653 | +70 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 10,583 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:03 | 10,585 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:35 | 10,587 | -22 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 10,609 | +4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 10,605 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 10,616 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 10,622 | -20 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 10,642 | +25 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 10,617 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 10,614 | +21 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 10,593 | +48 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 10,545 | +18 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 10,527 | +59 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 10,468 | first reading |
42 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 42 (13 August 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 15,429 |
| Reactions total | 179 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 20:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
612 reactions across 42 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 546 | 89.2% | |
| ❤ | 46 | 7.52% | |
| 😍 | 15 | 2.45% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 😘 | 2 | 0.327% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 612 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
评论送AORUS/GWTO/疾风卡密活动进行中!!! 活动链接: https://t.me/QYSJZFZ/843 评论完假卡/不给钱全家出门被车撞死!!!
👍4
🥰三角洲行动【AORUS猎鹰/root】用户反馈 真的太稳了 完全吊打那些拉闸项目 购买链接: https://mall.682fk.cn/shop/R2XX832T 评论领取天卡/8.00红包: https://t.me/QYSJZFZ/843
👍6
😃😀😃失控进化[GWTO直装/注入双版本]已更新最新版本⚠️ 1️⃣本次修复用户闪退问题,修复上号10年,修复网络波动 2️⃣修复吃举报闪框,修复下载模块失败,修复卡屏问题 3️⃣GWTO没有跑路某些傻逼不要在那里乱传😙不信谣,不传谣! 5️⃣这次更新太久,导致用户卡密失效,为了表达歉意,卡网价格已大降价 抢到就是赚到! 🔵🔵🔵🔵下载链接: https://wwbfz.lanzout.com/b019w3viij 🥰GWTO购买链接: https://mall.682fk.cn/shop/R2XX832T 评论领取GWTO天卡/8.00红包: https://t.me/QYSJZFZ/843
👍7
😃😀😃卡网已上架🫡三角洲行动【疾风直装】重磅来袭!😈实力作者打造⚠️ 🔈给全部的三角洲科技玩家带来不一样的体验✅ 🔵功能介绍:人物射线 血量显示 人物距离 名字显示 人物自瞄 物资显示 ❤️疾风直装全网唯一不拉闸不闪退不闪框的直装⚠️ 👍所有功能丝滑流畅 不掉帧不发热 全新UI完美兼容所有机型🔥 🥰疾风直装购买链接: https://mall.682fk.cn/shop/R2XX832T 评论领取疾风直装天卡/8.00红包: https://t.me/QYSJZFZ/843
👍15❤2😍1
失控进化【GWTO】8月30号用户反馈 全网唯一还能稳定连打的直装 搭配星辞端口 告别十年 GWTO购买链接: https://mall.682fk.cn/shop/R2XX832T 评论领取GWTO天卡/8.00红包: https://t.me/QYSJZFZ/843
👍15❤1
😃😀😃失控进化[GWTO]已更新国际服!!! 注:不能用谷歌那个版本的包 要从7723好游快爆里面下载 😙下载过国际服的 打开GWTO才会显示国际服出来 ☺️给全部的失控进化科技玩家带来不一样的体验✅ 😙功能介绍:骨骼显示 人物方框 血量显示 名字显示 人物射线 人物背敌 人物透视 物品绘制 触摸自瞄 📣我们团队已经解决了市面上解决不了的问题 网络环境问题/追封问题封1天/封7天/封十年问题 我们【GWTO】已经全部解决这类问题🥇 🫡GWTO直装全网唯一解决不闪退不拉闸不闪框不封号⚠️ 👍所有功能丝滑流畅 不掉帧不发热 全新UI完美兼容所有机型🔥 🥰GWTO购买链接: https://mall.682fk.cn/shop/R2XX832T 评论领取GWTO天卡/8.00红包: https://t.me/QYSJZFZ/843
👍11
白嫖7.99或卡密红包活动进行中 不弄虚作假 全网最真实 活动链接: https://t.me/QYSJZFZ/843 (送假卡不给钱出门全家被车撞死!)
👍15
😃😀😃失控进化【GWTO】已更新最新版本!!! 😙删除旧版本下新版本! (不可覆盖安装) 😙此版本百分百没有问题 1️⃣解决马绘制问题,以及地图无人区绘制问题 2️⃣修复个别用户闪退问题,增加回以前的稳定性,无视ACE检测 3️⃣修复模块下载失败/修复进度条闪退问题 🌟新版本下载链接: https://wwbfz.lanzout.com/b019w3viij 😙已给全部激活卡密的用户加时2小时 🥰GWTO购买链接: https://mall.682fk.cn/shop/R2XX832T 评论领取GWTO天卡/8.00红包: https://t.me/QYSJZFZ/843
👍26😍3❤2
😃😀😃失控进化[GWTO]已适配国际服😈越南实力作者开发❄️[直装注入双版本]全网首发唯一适配国际服项目!!! 😙下载过国际服的 打开GWTO才会显示国际服出来 ☺️给全部的失控进化科技玩家带来不一样的体验✅ 😙功能介绍:骨骼显示 人物方框 血量显示 名字显示 人物射线 人物背敌 人物透视 物品绘制 触摸自瞄 📣我们团队已经解决了市面上解决不了的问题 网络环境问题/追封问题封1天/封7天/封十年问题 我们【GWTO】已经全部解决这类问题🥇 🫡GWTO直装全网唯一解决不闪退不拉闸不闪框不封号⚠️ 👍所有功能丝滑流畅 不掉帧不发热 全新UI完美兼容所有机型🔥 🥰GWTO购买链接: https://mall.682fk.cn/shop/R2XX832T 评论领取GWTO天卡/8.00红包: https://t.me/QYSJZFZ/843
👍24
☺️失控进化【GWTO】给全部的失控进化科技玩家带来不一样的体验 拥有直装跟注入双版本 碾压市面上的任何项目! GWTO购买链接: https://mall.682fk.cn/shop/R2XX832T
👍17❤1
✅失控进化【GWTO】用户反馈 无视任何检测 拥有双版本 哪个版本都稳定! 👍GWTO科技 功能齐全 稳定顶尖为您排忧解难!! 🥰网盘已上传全套小白教程 售后无忧 稳定无疑 欢迎各大代理一起推广吃肉!! 🥰🌟购买链接: https://mall.682fk.cn/shop/R2XX832T
👍17❤3
👑失控进化【GWTO】8月24号用户反馈 依旧稳定连打功能齐全 流畅不卡顿!想要玩稳定项目就选【GWTO】 🥰🌟购买链接: https://mall.682fk.cn/shop/R2XX832T ✅评论领GWTO天卡/8.00红包: https://t.me/QYSJZFZ/843 😙合作/批卡/售后❤️@JHsae8
👍8❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @QYSJZFZ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@QYSJZFZ edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“星辞/grok/AORUS官方频道” (@QYSJZFZ), 11,523 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QYSJZFZ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.