Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 蝎子官方频道

Channel

蝎子官方频道

@RSAH66

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

30,196subscribers

+18,777 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003755290001
TypeChannel
Username@RSAH66
Description合作批卡售后客服联系 @XZNBH6 蝎子交流群: https://t.me/XZAH666 如误封私信机器人解封 @yx_codexbot 三角洲市场最稳定的项目频道之一 欢迎各位前来体验
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RSAH66

Topic

Software piracy — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,41932,70022,059.57 August 2026 — 11,419 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,419 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,445 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,495 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,497 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,533 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,565 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,602 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,725 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,905 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,975 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,129 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,256 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,323 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,436 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,559 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,605 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,627 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,618 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,609 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,576 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,563 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,374 subscribers1 September 2026 — 32,584 subscribers2 September 2026 — 32,605 subscribers4 September 2026 — 32,599 subscribers6 September 2026 — 32,700 subscribers9 September 2026 — 32,259 subscribers12 September 2026 — 31,729 subscribers13 September 2026 — 31,438 subscribers15 September 2026 — 30,941 subscribers17 September 2026 — 30,196 subscribers30,1967 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 41 days, net +18,777. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,227–35,892 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 20:5930,196-745
15 Sept 2026, 16:2130,941-497
13 Sept 2026, 23:1631,438-291
12 Sept 2026, 04:1831,729-530
9 Sept 2026, 22:0032,259-441
6 Sept 2026, 14:5632,700+101
4 Sept 2026, 02:3632,599-6
2 Sept 2026, 14:1432,605+21
1 Sept 2026, 14:1332,584+16,210
31 Aug 2026, 11:3516,374+3,811
30 Aug 2026, 09:4412,563-13
29 Aug 2026, 09:1312,576-33
28 Aug 2026, 07:1312,609-9
27 Aug 2026, 03:3912,618-9
26 Aug 2026, 03:4712,627+22
25 Aug 2026, 03:4112,605+46
24 Aug 2026, 00:4712,559+123
22 Aug 2026, 07:5712,436+113
20 Aug 2026, 22:1412,323+67
19 Aug 2026, 21:4412,256first reading

Engagement

398 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.32%
avg views ÷ 30,196 subscribers
Avg views / post
702
185 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.762%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
195
of 398 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 180 of 185 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held398 (6 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total129,862
Reactions total983
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 17:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
447
Videos
13
Links
53

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5m 55s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,891 reactions across 303 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,12059.2%
❤19910.5%
🤩753.97%
🔥733.86%
🎉713.75%
😍713.75%
🥰713.75%
❤‍🔥683.60%
💯613.23%
🤔402.12%
🖕90.476%
🤬70.37%
🤮70.37%
😁60.317%
💩50.264%
🤓50.264%
👏20.106%
👎10.053%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 306 of the 398 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,891 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 398 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 10:36 UTC292 views5 reactionsread 27 September 2026

📣蝎子算法解密已云更新 ❤️坐标解密己优化 ❤️修复所有已知Bug 蝎子提卡地址✅ https://luoye.yjsfk.cn/shop/XZNB666 合作批卡售后客服联系 @XZNBT6 包还是原来那个包 蝎子官方网盘 https://pan.quark.cn/s/6b2e46d29a2f

👍5

27 Sept 2026, 07:05 UTC451 views5 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

反馈红皮号连打蝎子的恩情还不完

👍5

26 Sept 2026, 14:36 UTC657 views12 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

蝎子算法解密稳定性这一块毋庸置疑 随便接单吃豆啊 现在蝎子反馈图也是多到根本发不过来了有些没有质量的都懒得发了 有任何疑难杂症优先先看网盘使用教程 蝎子提卡地址 https://luoye.yjsfk.cn/shop/XZNB666 蝎子官方网盘 https://pan.quark.cn/s/6b2e46d29a2f

👍11😁1

26 Sept 2026, 14:26 UTC618 views8 reactionsread 27 September 2026

哥,你这个是真稳定啊解密也不会出现漏人和脱框必须一辈子支持蝎子

👍7❤1

26 Sept 2026, 12:57 UTC452 views11 reactionsread 27 September 2026

大家目前有任何问题请重新联系此下方这个专属客服号 ​@XZNBT6 ​原客服号被限制了回不了信息了 望各位理解

👍11

Showing the 12 most recent of 398 posts we hold for @RSAH66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@RSAH66 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
31 August 2026
Most recent edit
6 September 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTCAnonymous Poll411 voters

蝎子是公益还是收费

  1. 公益(不公益,我们学生党怎么玩)81%
  2. 收费(以防泛滥提高稳定性)19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 398 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“蝎子官方频道” (@RSAH66), 30,196 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RSAH66.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.