Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 暗区LS内部官方频道

Channel

暗区LS内部官方频道

@LS00889

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,882subscribers

+1,535 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003886955708
TypeChannel
Usernames@LS00889 @NEXUS6677
Description客服 @UU0088_BOT 唯一提卡渠道自助提卡网 免手续费 https://shop.bromk.cn/shop/NVGE2CHC 交流群:https://t.me/ls99883
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 September 2026
Measurements held13
On Telegramt.me/LS00889

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,90511,8827,893.516 August 2026 — 10,347 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,335 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,312 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,353 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,302 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,257 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,215 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,167 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,122 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,033 subscribers12 September 2026 — 5,944 subscribers16 September 2026 — 3,905 subscribers28 September 2026 — 11,882 subscribers16 August 202628 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net +1,535. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,708–13,079 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 17:2211,882+7,977
16 Sept 2026, 04:363,905-2,039
12 Sept 2026, 16:375,944-89
9 Sept 2026, 00:586,033-89
3 Sept 2026, 06:366,122-45
31 Aug 2026, 05:056,167-48
28 Aug 2026, 15:326,215-42
25 Aug 2026, 17:486,257-45
22 Aug 2026, 20:136,302-51
19 Aug 2026, 08:436,353-3,959
18 Aug 2026, 09:0310,312-23
17 Aug 2026, 12:2310,335-12
16 Aug 2026, 16:4510,347first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 16 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.64%
avg views ÷ 11,882 subscribers
Avg views / post
433
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.433%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held25 (16 August 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total5,196
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Sept 2026, 17:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 17s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

22 reactions across 12 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍22100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Sept 2026, 15:42 UTC29 views2 reactionsread 28 September 2026

现在满满的全都是反馈 还不下手 名额满了就不出卡了

👍2

28 Sept 2026, 15:42 UTC972 views2 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

暗区全网独家网页雷达效果展示

👍2

28 Sept 2026, 15:42 UTC27 views2 reactionsread 28 September 2026

🤡暗区全网独家网页雷达效果展示 可以队友一起进来看哦🤓

👍2

28 Sept 2026, 15:08 UTC351 viewsread 28 September 2026
Photo

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️🎮暗区突围内部 【Ls】裸奔内核自瞄解密⭐️ 👉周卡588RMB或88USDT ⚡️必须要过完环境之后再买!暗区的环境检测很强 推荐之前使用过别的辅助的全盘刷机 因为不确保别的垃圾辅助的残留可能会导致暗区扫盘封号 本项目无敌稳定 只会最多乱杀因被AI检测行为一天 1️⃣当前支持5.1-6.6 全部内核版本 2️⃣裸奔陀螺仪自瞄/触摸自瞄 两种方式自瞄 3️⃣解密不会被任何方式检测 和谐不会出现任何封号情况 4️⃣独家功能大地图雷达 看人更方便便捷 开卡名额80个!满人无!可大号 开卡认准UU,谨防诈骗! 支持私信客服 USDT付款!免手续费 🎚️内部聊天群:(下单私信客服进内部项目组)@SJZNB6688 👉限时额外服务:包刷机+环境一条龙 双向客服:😃😃😃😃@UU0088_BOT 🥰🛒官方认证 免手续费卡网 点我➡️ https://shop.bromk.cn/shop/NVGE2CHC ❤️卡网进…

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @LS00889. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“暗区LS内部官方频道” (@LS00889), 11,882 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LS00889.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.