Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 天使内核公益主频道(第五人格/王者荣耀)

Channel

天使内核公益主频道(第五人格/王者荣耀)

@ssoo66668

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

116,797subscribers

+1,928 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002075647024
TypeChannel
Usernames@so66666 @ssoo66668
Description交流群组:https://t.me/ssoo66666 禁止搬运,二改,倒卖,此频道破解的所有发布的资源 免责声明 本频道中的所有内容均来源于网络,仅供个人学习和研究使用,请在24小时之内删除,请勿用于任何商业用途或非法用途。如果您喜欢该资源,请支持正版,购买正版资源。如有任何内容侵犯了您的权益,请及时联系我们,我们将立即予以删除.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held35
On Telegramt.me/ssoo66668

Topic

Software piracy — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

114,031116,797115,4147 August 2026 — 114,869 subscribers7 August 2026 — 114,874 subscribers8 August 2026 — 114,766 subscribers9 August 2026 — 114,633 subscribers10 August 2026 — 114,557 subscribers11 August 2026 — 114,433 subscribers12 August 2026 — 114,279 subscribers13 August 2026 — 114,222 subscribers14 August 2026 — 114,031 subscribers16 August 2026 — 114,772 subscribers18 August 2026 — 114,886 subscribers19 August 2026 — 114,890 subscribers20 August 2026 — 114,942 subscribers22 August 2026 — 115,015 subscribers24 August 2026 — 114,896 subscribers25 August 2026 — 114,901 subscribers26 August 2026 — 115,043 subscribers27 August 2026 — 115,182 subscribers28 August 2026 — 115,321 subscribers29 August 2026 — 115,452 subscribers30 August 2026 — 115,537 subscribers31 August 2026 — 115,599 subscribers1 September 2026 — 115,618 subscribers2 September 2026 — 115,574 subscribers3 September 2026 — 115,665 subscribers5 September 2026 — 115,727 subscribers8 September 2026 — 115,892 subscribers11 September 2026 — 115,869 subscribers13 September 2026 — 115,896 subscribers14 September 2026 — 115,852 subscribers16 September 2026 — 115,880 subscribers18 September 2026 — 115,783 subscribers24 September 2026 — 116,060 subscribers26 September 2026 — 116,797 subscribers26 September 2026 — 116,797 subscribers7 August 202626 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net +1,928. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 113,616–117,212 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 15:22116,797no change
26 Sept 2026, 14:47116,797+737
24 Sept 2026, 20:39116,060+277
18 Sept 2026, 20:15115,783-97
16 Sept 2026, 14:59115,880+28
14 Sept 2026, 18:59115,852-44
13 Sept 2026, 03:57115,896+27
11 Sept 2026, 07:18115,869-23
8 Sept 2026, 13:17115,892+165
5 Sept 2026, 10:38115,727+62
3 Sept 2026, 15:59115,665+91
2 Sept 2026, 09:56115,574-44
1 Sept 2026, 11:04115,618+19
31 Aug 2026, 08:05115,599+62
30 Aug 2026, 09:44115,537+85
29 Aug 2026, 06:35115,452+131
28 Aug 2026, 05:36115,321+139
27 Aug 2026, 05:32115,182+139
26 Aug 2026, 06:26115,043+142
25 Aug 2026, 04:05114,901first reading

Engagement

798 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 122 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.586%
avg views ÷ 116,797 subscribers
Avg views / post
684
369 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
375
of 798 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held798 (4 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total252,393
Reactions total8,375
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 03:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
34
Videos
41
Links
12

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7m 47s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

14,589 reactions across 779 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍13,89195.2%
❤3272.24%
🤔980.672%
🤓710.487%
🤣320.219%
😱270.185%
🥰220.151%
😘210.144%
😭200.137%
❤‍🔥140.096%
🤝130.089%
🥱120.082%
😇90.062%
😍80.055%
🔥60.041%
🙉50.034%
👏30.021%
😡30.021%
🤨30.021%
😁20.014%
1 further kind20.014%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 786 of the 798 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,589 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 798 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 03:17 UTC72 views36 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍35😱1

Signed 天使 王者第五内核开发(慈善家刘子懿)

27 Sept 2026, 03:17 UTC71 views40 reactionsread 27 September 2026

我来反馈了 这个太好用了 1.8 版本完全不卡框了 贼流畅 谢谢谢谢谢谢谢谢谢谢谢 玩李信偷塔玩的贼爽

👍39😱1

Signed 天使 王者第五内核开发(慈善家刘子懿)

27 Sept 2026, 03:15 UTC91 views39 reactionsread 27 September 2026

玩的1.7还没试新版

👍38😱1

Signed 天使 王者第五内核开发(慈善家刘子懿)

27 Sept 2026, 03:15 UTC87 views39 reactionsread 27 September 2026

有时候绘制会卡 就没其它问题了

👍38😱1

Signed 天使 王者第五内核开发(慈善家刘子懿)

27 Sept 2026, 03:15 UTC86 views39 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍38😱1

Signed 天使 王者第五内核开发(慈善家刘子懿)

27 Sept 2026, 03:02 UTC100 views22 reactionsread 27 September 2026

📥内部项目已更新📥 开启内测 广招全网内测员 适配游戏: 🎮和平精英 🎮PUBGM 🎮王者荣耀 🎮三角洲行动 支持root noroot 容器版本 虚拟机纯C 内核版本 内测群组已开放 https://t.me/+B9Xot9ZwdfE3Njdl https://t.me/+B9Xot9ZwdfE3Njdl

👍20🤔2

Signed 阿呆 (全网收管理) @adggku

26 Sept 2026, 19:09 UTC≈1,110 views31 reactionsread 27 September 2026

好了睡觉了下线了,有任何 bug 或者更新建议留言给我,预计明天下午 3 点起床 @facenb

👍28🤔3

Signed 天使 王者第五内核开发(慈善家刘子懿)

26 Sept 2026, 19:08 UTC≈1,310 views29 reactionsread 27 September 2026
File

天使第五公益内核 1.7.zip 更新日志 9.27 🔤1.修复部分人会打一段时间闪退的问题 🔤2.修复一下其他的 bug,有 bug 或者更新建议请及时反馈给我 😁😁永久公益,无任何网络验证,无敌稳定(独家隐藏随机特征),官方交流群@ssoo66666👍👍

👍27🤔2

Signed 天使 王者第五内核开发(慈善家刘子懿)

26 Sept 2026, 19:02 UTC≈1,090 views27 reactionsread 27 September 2026

你们最爱的图片显示也是更新了 好吧😁😁 适配全英雄,全技能

👍26🤔1

Signed 天使 王者第五内核开发(慈善家刘子懿)

26 Sept 2026, 19:00 UTC≈1,070 views29 reactionsread 27 September 2026
File

天使王者公益内核1.8.zip 更新日志 9.27 🔤1.王者小地图名称绘制改为图片绘制,以及 CD 显示也改为图片 🔤2.如果你还是卡框 请将诊断文件私聊给我 永久公益,无任何网络验证,无敌稳定,解密不动任何内存,官方交流群@ssoo66666

👍26❤2🤔1

Signed 天使 王者第五内核开发(慈善家刘子懿)

26 Sept 2026, 18:11 UTC990 views38 reactionsread 27 September 2026

预计几十分钟后第 5 和王者再更新一次

👍36🤔2

Signed 天使 王者第五内核开发(慈善家刘子懿)

26 Sept 2026, 18:04 UTC987 views38 reactionsread 27 September 2026

给大家推荐一个稳定的内核 和平精英LV内核解密追踪 @LV520A

👍38

Showing the 12 most recent of 798 posts we hold for @ssoo66668. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ssoo66668 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
31 August 2026
Most recent edit
31 August 2026

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Sept 2026, 10:32 UTCAnonymous Poll661 voters

接下来适配三角洲还是和平精英?

  1. 和平43%
  2. 三角洲64%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Sept 2026, 17:25 UTCAnonymous Poll431 voters

接下来适配三角洲还是和平精英?

  1. 和平40%
  2. 三角洲67%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Sept 2026, 12:11 UTCAnonymous Poll72 voters

接下来适配三角洲还是和平精英?

  1. 和平44%
  2. 三角洲64%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 798 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“天使内核公益主频道(第五人格/王者荣耀)” (@ssoo66668), 116,797 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ssoo66668.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.