解密关闭了服务器,太多人了,cpu一直是满的跑不动
👍123🤬14🖕5🤮3👌1😍1
Signed 五月飞雪

Channel
@TPKernel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
97,552subscribers
+23,692 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003831295700 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TPKernel |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 8 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TPKernel |
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 14:55 | 97,552 | +7,616 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:00 | 89,936 | +533 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:55 | 89,403 | +309 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 89,094 | +560 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 88,534 | +1,188 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 87,346 | +729 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 86,617 | +1,543 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:41 | 85,074 | +546 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:55 | 84,528 | +436 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:26 | 84,092 | +254 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:04 | 83,838 | +332 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 83,506 | +475 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 83,031 | +603 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 82,428 | +435 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 81,993 | +457 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 81,536 | +396 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 81,140 | +297 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 80,843 | +485 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 80,358 | +346 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 80,012 | first reading |
196 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 111 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 196 (8 July 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,891,808 |
| Reactions total | 11,052 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 05:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 29 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
19,961 reactions across 196 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15,097 | 75.6% | |
| 🤣 | 1,025 | 5.14% | |
| 🫡 | 920 | 4.61% | |
| 🤬 | 615 | 3.08% | |
| 💩 | 531 | 2.66% | |
| 🤮 | 452 | 2.26% | |
| 👎 | 299 | 1.50% | |
| 🤡 | 284 | 1.42% | |
| 🤩 | 226 | 1.13% | |
| 😍 | 219 | 1.10% | |
| 🖕 | 155 | 0.777% | |
| 🤓 | 83 | 0.416% | |
| 👌 | 55 | 0.276% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 196 of the 196 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,961 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 196 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TPKernel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 196 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
解密关闭了服务器,太多人了,cpu一直是满的跑不动
👍123🤬14🖕5🤮3👌1😍1
Signed 五月飞雪
😀❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ 😀裸奔漏打 免Root网页共享雷达 ⚫️算法解密 无视游戏最新坐标加密 😀精美UI ➡️可选图像/文字绘制样式 ⚙全功能齐全:漏打/雷达/自瞄/物资/容器 ✅不闪框 ✅不聚框 ✅不漏人 ❤️ 加入频道获取公益内核 ❤️ 获取免Root网页3D雷达 ⭐️ 公益卡密:@astradfm ✅人物绘制✅内核自瞄✅漏哪打哪 ✅物资绘制✅容器绘制✅地图雷达 ✅模型漏打✅算法解密✅安全可靠
👍52
Signed 五月飞雪
现在有什么建议吗
👍98🤬4
Signed 五月飞雪
😀❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ 😀裸奔漏打 免Root网页共享雷达 ⚫️算法解密 无视游戏最新坐标加密 😀精美UI ➡️可选图像/文字绘制样式 ⚙全功能齐全:漏打/雷达/自瞄/物资/容器 ✅不闪框 ✅不聚框 ✅不漏人 ❤️ 加入频道获取公益内核 ❤️ 获取免Root网页3D雷达 ⭐️ 公益卡密:@astradfm ✅人物绘制✅内核自瞄✅漏哪打哪 ✅物资绘制✅容器绘制✅地图雷达 ✅模型漏打✅算法解密✅安全可靠
👍85👎2
Signed 五月飞雪
Sticker, posted without a caption
👍112🤮7🤡6😍4🤬3🤣1
Signed C.C
中秋快乐
👍228🫡21😍11💩5👎2
Signed 五月飞雪
三角洲公益解密 @astradfm
👍91
Signed 五月飞雪
疑似服务器被挤炸了 云算法连接失败 st一样
👍88
Signed 五月飞雪
tp已更新5.9新增暗区解密国服卡片仅支持安卓16+ 由于算法在服务器,并且服务器配置一般,来回传输速度可能延迟较高 有实力的黑客可以自行逆向服务器源码 解密不动内存,动内存4000+,拉修改是行为和吃举报太多导致 https://t.me/TPKernel/1384
👍168🤩3
Signed 五月飞雪
😀❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ 😀裸奔漏打 免Root网页共享雷达 ⚫️算法解密 无视游戏最新坐标加密 😀精美UI ➡️可选图像/文字绘制样式 ⚙全功能齐全:漏打/雷达/自瞄/物资/容器 ✅不闪框 ✅不聚框 ✅不漏人 ❤️ 加入频道获取公益内核 ❤️ 获取免Root网页3D雷达 ⭐️ 公益卡密:@astradfm ✅人物绘制✅内核自瞄✅漏哪打哪 ✅物资绘制✅容器绘制✅地图雷达 ✅模型漏打✅算法解密✅安全可靠
👍102🤬4
Signed 五月飞雪
理解一下 我不想到时候暗区项目全是解密泛滥售卖 因为不是内存也不是udp解包更不是断点
👍124🤬9😍4
Signed 五月飞雪
第一个视频是我本地解密包无延迟无闪框 第二个是发布的服务器算法 算法在服务器来回传输延迟有300ms左右 适合单透 自瞄跟不上 但是几百个人几千个人同时在线我不能保证延迟低,只能说延迟比这个视频的还高
👍109😍7
Signed 五月飞雪
Showing the 12 most recent of 196 posts we hold for @TPKernel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@TPKernel edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TP通知频道<有问题置顶找解决>” (@TPKernel), 97,552 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TPKernel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.