库洛米三角洲/暗区最新版本已上传至网盘自行每日下载 https://drive.uc.cn/s/316265f7583f4?public=1 公益卡密: @kuluomi999 雷达自助机器人 @bbblajibot
👍25
Signed TGBot Pro

Channel
@kuluomi886
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
78,270subscribers
+68,486 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003011374781 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @kuluomi886 @nb117n |
| Description | 无广频道 @kuluomi999 (都进一下) 公益雷达签到机器人 @bbblajibot 广告联系遗憾 @yihan52 官方交流群 @kuluomi777 |
| Created | 21 September 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kuluomi886 |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 21:59 | 78,270 | +54 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 16:07 | 78,216 | +271 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 17:47 | 77,945 | +2,043 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:10 | 75,902 | +342 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 16:27 | 75,560 | +75,533 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:46 | 27 | -75,250 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:56 | 75,277 | +255 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 20:08 | 75,022 | +307 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 17:29 | 74,715 | +496 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:21 | 74,219 | +417 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 73,802 | +380 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:35 | 73,422 | +143 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:27 | 73,279 | +73,254 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 12:50 | 25 | -73,006 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 10:48 | 73,031 | +266 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 11:49 | 72,765 | +183 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:15 | 72,582 | +1,049 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 10:26 | 71,533 | +1,029 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:27 | 70,504 | +625 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:04 | 69,879 | first reading |
758 posts held, back to 21 September 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 191 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 758 (21 September 2025 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,789,176 |
| Reactions total | 43,150 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 20:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
81,178 reactions across 756 posts, in 63 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 65,100 | 80.2% | |
| ❤ | 6,427 | 7.92% | |
| 🤬 | 1,342 | 1.65% | |
| 👏 | 1,193 | 1.47% | |
| 🖕 | 963 | 1.19% | |
| 🤡 | 808 | 0.995% | |
| 🥰 | 736 | 0.907% | |
| 🤔 | 720 | 0.887% | |
| 😭 | 600 | 0.739% | |
| 🔥 | 587 | 0.723% | |
| 💩 | 332 | 0.409% | |
| 😍 | 248 | 0.306% | |
| 🤩 | 240 | 0.296% | |
| 😡 | 230 | 0.283% | |
| 👎 | 171 | 0.211% | |
| 🤣 | 158 | 0.195% | |
| 🍌 | 156 | 0.192% | |
| 🎉 | 141 | 0.174% | |
| 🕊 | 116 | 0.143% | |
| 😱 | 102 | 0.126% | |
| 43 further kinds | 808 | 0.995% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 756 of the 758 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81,178 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 758 most recent posts we hold, published 21 September 2025 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 19 of 363 posts held from the last 30 days (5.23%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
库洛米三角洲/暗区最新版本已上传至网盘自行每日下载 https://drive.uc.cn/s/316265f7583f4?public=1 公益卡密: @kuluomi999 雷达自助机器人 @bbblajibot
👍25
Signed TGBot Pro
点击下面按键教大家如何挣钱.无押金挣钱.免费带你找靠谱项目.让大家变成人才❗️❗️❗️
👍52🔥2❤1
Signed 阿呆 (全网收管理) @adggku
暗区重新写了,之前的太丑,太难用了并且型增多个解密和防设备脸功能,而且还有作者专用解密,因为我明天要开始玩了
👍55❤1
需要内核root网页雷达吗?需要root
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👍66❤2
库洛米三角洲/暗区最新版本已上传至网盘自行每日下载 https://drive.uc.cn/s/316265f7583f4?public=1 公益卡密: @kuluomi999 雷达自助机器人 @bbblajibot
👍76❤1
Signed TGBot Pro
💸HERO黑盒4.0正式发布 · 全网独家 🔍 核心功能 ⬇️手机号定位 ⬇️身份证正反 ⬇️ 支付宝码反 ⬇️全家户籍 ❄️补齐身份证 ❄️精准猎魔 ❄️个人大头 ❄️ai脱衣 🛡手机反户籍 🛡酒店摄像直播 🛡微反三件套 🛡照片人脸反 🖥刑侦全户 🖥抖音去水印 🖥短信轰炸 🖥电话轰炸 📱无违规永久思路 🛰️无违规概率永久思路 🆕 新增几个功能:三角洲每日密码,顶级补齐,开房查询,口令反户,抖音反户...... 等 几百种功能 更快 · 更清晰 · 更稳定 🔽官方获取卡密频道🔽 点我获取卡密 点我获取卡密 点我获取卡密 点我获取卡密
👍109❤2
Signed 全网收集广告@ai520i
半夜想要看片👀找不到的各种资源群里都可以搜索的到 🔍 相关游戏外挂安装包也可以搜的到 关键词:萝莉 黑丝 御姐 少萝 白丝 老师 洛丽塔 JK 等等 ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.me/sos73781 https://t.me/sos73781 https://t.me/sos73781
👍116❤5👏3
我操他妈的电报上骗子怎么这么多啊!!直到我遇到他 @adggnbkefu 我才知道一小时可以挣1988元 目前已经拿下苹果18了😁
👍126❤6
Signed 阿呆 (全网收管理) @adggku
库洛米公益卡密:联系机器人获取 @bbblajibot
👍133❤5
开挂没号玩? 不敢用自己大号开挂? 害怕😨被封? 想体验皮肤? 想要游戏资产多的号? 想免费玩号? ❤️老八高质量三角洲数据号源头自营✔️ ➡️😃😃退游号😃😃高质量号 ➡️😃😃😃😃 源头直营最低价格 ➡️😃😃不鉴别、无人脸、不冻结 ➡️全网最质量最低价格 最强售后😒 🥇一年诚信经营,三年售后兜底 😙😍😗😋😝🙃😜🤨😜 👍👍 ❤️主推-购买地址: https://buy.heevcmlz.cn/ ❤️备用2-购买地址 https://buy.sjhnb.com/ 上面两个卡网都可以用,哪个能打开用哪个 ❤️老八数据号官方频道:https://t.me/xcnb666 ✅客服:@djsjhnb6
👍145❤2🕊1
无广频道没加入的火速加入一下 @kuluomi999
👍129❤1
破解认准--狗头实力破解 投稿99.99%项目都可破解欢迎投稿破解pc端/ios/安卓/直装内核都可以投稿 和平/王者/三角洲/暗区/无畏契约/失控进化/永劫无间/CFM/超凡先锋/迷你世界/火影忍者/香肠派对/vpn类破解类 进频道后置顶查找你想玩的游戏 少点圈💰多点工艺 净化挂圈从我狗头做起! ❗️❗️➡️ @pj7645 ❗️❗️➡️ @goutou46
👍148❤3👏1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 758 posts we hold for @kuluomi886. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@kuluomi886 edited 46 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 4 posts on @kuluomi886 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
需要内核root网页雷达吗?需要root
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
暗区是否适配 4 系
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
需不需要开放无解密版本(睡醒看哪个投票多)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
推荐参考价格
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
是否取消对四系的支持?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
解密和谐了吗
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 758 most recent posts we hold, published 21 September 2025 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 53 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 76 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kuluomi886 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“库洛米官方公益频道” (@kuluomi886), 78,270 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kuluomi886.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.