Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 心悦三角洲公益UDP解密

Channel

心悦三角洲公益UDP解密

@XY_kernel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

154subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 26 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004226878835
TypeChannel
Username@XY_kernel
Description三角洲/UDP解密大王频道 心悦交流群: https://t.me/XYJM_kernel 多种纯算法解密,已完成全部机型解密,实时同步游戏更新,多条链路兜底,多种高端功能,掩体漏打 AI 压枪,网页雷达等等 欢迎体验 #三角洲内核
Created25 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded26 September 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/XY_kernel

Growth

15426 Sept 2026, 05:47 — 154 subscribers26 Sept 2026, 06:22 — 154 subscribers26 Sept 2026, 05:4726 Sept 2026, 06:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 153–155 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 06:22154no change
26 Sept 2026, 05:47154first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 25 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
647.1%
avg views ÷ 154 subscribers
Avg views / post
997
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held5 (25 September 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total3,986
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 06:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Videos
1
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍562.5%
❤337.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 06:01 UTC85 viewsread 26 September 2026

自瞄绝对嘎嘎好用 目前适配性比较低 还在写着 枪枪一个点上

26 Sept 2026, 04:03 UTC716 views5 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

稳定性大家放心中就完事了 本人亲测一个星期发布

👍5

26 Sept 2026, 03:39 UTC≈3,100 views3 reactionsread 26 September 2026
File

🎮心悦三角洲UDP解密内核 ✔️带有完整的算法触摸自瞄 ✔️ 支持所有角色职业绘制 ✔️ 二种触摸自瞄方式选择 ✔️ 适配全机型完美UDP解密 ✔️ 全英雄全技能正常显示 ✔️ 独家灵动岛绘制 独家绘图绘制 ❌如果内存解密作者死全局 🩵官方交流群组 https://t.me/XYJM_kernel ⭐卡密:@XY_kernel ✉️作者 @XYJMKF 🔝更新频道 https://t.me/XY_kernel https://t.me/XY_kernel https://t.me/XY_kernel

❤3

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @XY_kernel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“心悦三角洲公益UDP解密” (@XY_kernel), 154 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XY_kernel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.