Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 落叶公益内核

Channel

落叶公益内核

@luoyenb521

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

63,899subscribers

+7,065 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002003624686
TypeChannel
Usernames@limee666 @luoyenb521
Description来自于落叶旗下的分项目落叶公益内核 柠檬王者/和平精英/三角洲/无畏契约公益内核 问题反馈或bug反馈 @luoyebay 交流群 @LMkernel
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/luoyenb521

Growth

263,89931,950.57 August 2026 — 56,834 subscribers8 August 2026 — 56,821 subscribers9 August 2026 — 56,731 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2 subscribers11 August 2026 — 58,217 subscribers11 August 2026 — 58,416 subscribers13 August 2026 — 59,482 subscribers14 August 2026 — 61,381 subscribers15 August 2026 — 63,899 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net +7,065. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:3463,899+2,518
14 Aug 2026, 05:2861,381+1,899
13 Aug 2026, 00:1959,482+1,066
11 Aug 2026, 22:1258,416+199
11 Aug 2026, 18:0158,217+58,215
10 Aug 2026, 10:182-56,729
9 Aug 2026, 02:1256,731-90
8 Aug 2026, 02:2656,821-13
7 Aug 2026, 22:4556,834first reading

Engagement

175 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.98%
avg views ÷ 63,899 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,260
157 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
175
of 175 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 156 of 157 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held175 (27 July 202616 August 2026)
Views total198,190
Reactions total2,322
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
79
Videos
6
Links
25

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 45s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,322 reactions across 154 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,01086.6%
1717.36%
🌭281.21%
😁170.732%
😍160.689%
👏150.646%
🥰140.603%
🍌110.474%
💯80.345%
🔥80.345%
🍓40.172%
🎉40.172%
😢40.172%
😭40.172%
🥱40.172%
🤩20.086%
10.043%
🎄10.043%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 156 of the 175 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,322reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 175 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 157 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @luoyenb521. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 175 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 01:33 UTC121 views7 reactionsread 16 August 2026

庆祝频道人数64k 给大家发一个红包

👍7

Signed 实名 八弟

16 Aug 2026, 01:33 UTC68 views7 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @LDL123Photo

😀起点钱包 马年福利季已达到! ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 豪礼相送!⚡️ 🤥起点空投钱包【疯狂送钱中】 发送了一个空投红包🤑 🪙总金额: 50000 USDT💰 剩余:2132/6888 🥇 533.52(10:22:29) 💰 - 落花流水无 🥈 433.10(10:22:31) 💰 - shieie264w 🥉 421.34(10:22:32) 💰 - 顾青川

👍7

Signed 实名 八弟

16 Aug 2026, 00:53 UTC363 views17 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍14🥰1😁1😍1

Signed 陪我久一点

16 Aug 2026, 00:47 UTC393 views15 reactionsread 16 August 2026

下个版本更新算法无后

👍15

Signed 陪我久一点

15 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC675 views11 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍92

Signed 陪我久一点

15 Aug 2026, 22:53 UTC712 views7 reactionsread 16 August 2026

😙今天我整合了挂圈各大热门频道! 以下频道是挂圈热门频道大合集 库洛米公益频道 enen内核频道 林羽内核频道 小雪内核频道 狗头公益破解频道 光头强工艺内核频道 雪花工艺内核频道 TP工艺内核频道 葫芦娃工艺频道 互推日进500+用户 参加联系 @didb431 (频道主联系) 参加互推要求:频道10k+日浏览800 全网收广告位联系 @didb431 ------------------------------------- 点我一键加入全部频道🗡️ 点我一键加入全部频道🗡️ 点我一键加入全部频道🗡️

👍52

Signed TG最强高质量互推

15 Aug 2026, 21:50 UTC860 views4 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

✔️蜜雪高质量无限授权源头自营✔️ ➡️😃😃退游号😃😃退游号 ➡️😃😃😃😃 源头直营最低价格 ➡️😃😃不鉴别、无人脸、不冻结 🥇一年诚信经营,三年售后兜底 😙😍😗😋😝🙃😜🤨😜 👍👍购买链接: https://new.818fka.com/shop/MH6 https://new.818fka.com/shop/MH6 👍唯一售后客服 @MXSH678 🤝 📱唯一频道: @MXSJH6 🔥购买必须录制全程视频 方便售后 支持首次登录任何问题售后 ⚠️二卖出门被车撞死⚠️ ⚠️跑路出门被车撞死⚠️ 📱数据号通知频道【务必加入】 https://t.me/MXSJH6

2👍2

Signed 牛子鸡

15 Aug 2026, 21:22 UTC841 views11 reactionsread 16 August 2026

⭐今天我整合了挂圈各大热门频道! 以下频道是挂圈热门频道大合集 LV公益内核频道 落叶公益内核频道 爱玩多内核公益频道 enen内核频道 林羽内核频道 小雪内核频道 吴迪公益破解频道 光头强工艺内核频道 雪花工艺内核频道 TP工艺内核频道 葫芦娃工艺频道 互推日进500+用户 参加联系 @qxnbg686 (频道主联系) 参加互推要求:频道10k+日浏览800 ❤️已加入超多百K大频道共享流量 ------------------------------------- 点我一键加入全部频道🗡️ 点我一键加入全部频道🗡️ 点我一键加入全部频道🗡️

👍101

Signed hoh .

15 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC908 views18 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍15🍌21

Signed 陪我久一点

15 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTC≈2,310 views13 reactionsread 16 August 2026

能发视频愿意直播的可以加一下这个群 落叶传媒正在招人 并且在快手评论区评论-评论必须得是挂圈的视频且流量必须得高 落叶内核神秘代码 @luoyenb521 每个评论按0.1 发视频保底就有2到10块,可以加入传媒吃保底 传媒群 https://t.me/+LFCbeCgBt8hkOGM0

👍13

Signed 陪我久一点

15 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC≈1,090 views16 reactionsread 16 August 2026

反馈 @luoyebay

👍122🥰1😁1

Signed 陪我久一点

15 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC≈1,390 views19 reactionsread 16 August 2026

luoye.chyidc.cn/shop/luoye 落叶数据号

👍172

Signed 陪我久一点

Showing the 12 most recent of 175 posts we hold for @luoyenb521. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTCAnonymous Poll417 voters

hello

  1. 90%
  2. 10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 175 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 16 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 19,176 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“落叶公益内核” (@luoyenb521), 63,899 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luoyenb521.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.