Я — Елена Чернявская, химик-технолог косметического бренда
Рассказываю как сделать так, чтобы косметика приносила результат
Бренд👉 https://lenelstore.ru
YouTube👉 https://clck.ru/3LV52W
Сотрудничество @Boriska_work
Номер регистрации канала: 4917099737
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
39 measurements spanning 70 days, net -644. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,971–42,029 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 39
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Oct 2026, 01:57
41,093
-10
15 Oct 2026, 03:48
41,103
-62
14 Oct 2026, 01:41
41,165
-87
11 Oct 2026, 05:38
41,252
-120
6 Oct 2026, 22:58
41,372
-35
1 Oct 2026, 23:56
41,407
-2
18 Sept 2026, 15:19
41,409
-70
16 Sept 2026, 04:00
41,479
+5
14 Sept 2026, 09:17
41,474
+144
12 Sept 2026, 17:17
41,330
-65
10 Sept 2026, 17:58
41,395
-90
7 Sept 2026, 14:22
41,485
-42
4 Sept 2026, 17:58
41,527
-34
3 Sept 2026, 01:46
41,561
-26
1 Sept 2026, 22:08
41,587
-10
1 Sept 2026, 01:04
41,597
-37
31 Aug 2026, 03:29
41,634
-33
30 Aug 2026, 03:12
41,667
-18
29 Aug 2026, 00:28
41,685
-32
27 Aug 2026, 22:34
41,717
first reading
Engagement
68 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 134 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.63%
avg views ÷ 41,093 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,310
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 68 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026
Posts held
68 (24 July 2026 – 16 October 2026)
Views total
62,455
Reactions total
1,572
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Oct 2026, 07:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,390
Videos
≈850
Links
≈816
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 00m
Average length
2m 39s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,792 reactions across 68 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,446
59.5%
🔥
980
16.9%
👍
658
11.4%
😁
211
3.64%
🎉
190
3.28%
👏
131
2.26%
🥰
68
1.17%
😱
33
0.57%
🤩
28
0.483%
🤔
21
0.363%
😢
15
0.259%
🤯
11
0.19%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 68 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,792 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 16 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мне тут написали- «неужели женщины действительно такое могут забыть?»😂 видимо да🤷🏻♀️
Хотя, конечно, первый раз так вышло. Обычно я помню и заранее покупаю подарок🙈
Ну а мы уже дома💪
В понедельник опять улетать, но на этот раз не на отдых, а в командировку.
Нет, это вообще не про то, что стайлинговые средства опасны и их срочно нужно чем-то заменять. Совсем не про это!
А про то, что, оказывается, для фиксации завитка можно обойтись и без дополнительных стайлинговых средств. Особенно это здорово в путешествиях, когда не хочется брать с собой лишние баночки.
К стайлинговым средствам я отношусь совершенно нормально. Они наносятся на стержень волоса, а не на кожу головы. …
После вашего крема я стайлинговыми средствами перестала пользоваться. Похожая ситуация произошла. Всё закончилось, остался только крем. И мне его вполне достаточно оказалось. Волосы у меня тоже тонкие, пористые, волнистые.
На отдых я не взяла ни одного стайлингового средства для волос. Просто забыла 🙈
Сначала, конечно, расстроилась. У меня тонкие, стекловидные волосы, которые без укладочных средств вообще ничего не держат. Думаю, ну всё, буду теперь ходить с прямыми, как палки, волосами.
Но наш крем-уход для волос LENEL я, конечно же, взяла. И решила попробовать использовать его вместо стайлинга. Нанесла перед сушкой побольше обычног…
ДАРИМ мастхэв осенней аптечки!
🎨🎨🎨✔️Для ухода за
🎨🎨🎨проблемной кожей
🎨🎨🎨✔️Для ухода за кожей
🎨🎨🎨головы
🎨🎨🎨✔️Для ароматических
🎨🎨🎨процедур
🎨🎨🎨✔️Один флакон — много
способов применения
Натуральное эфирное
масло чайного дерева Lenel — универсальное SOS-средство, которое полезно иметь дома
До 17 октября дарим флакон
5 мл к заказу от 5000 ₽!
Условия акции: соберите корзину с любимыми средствами Lene…
Я крайне редко вижу эффект от чего-то. Но тут решила попробовать сыворотку. Реально волосы стали меньше выпадать. Я купила серию все … в общем мою 2 месяц и сыворотка. Сегодня была у парикмахера. Она говорит очень много новых волосиков по голове
Считаю, что большая часть компонентов шампуней смывается в канализацию. Просто потому что не успевает сработать за условные 2 минуты процедуры мытья волос. А дольше держать моющее средство на голове не стоит, так как ПАВы, какими бы они мягкими не были.
За что действительно стоит платить в шампуне - это сами ПАВы. Еще успеют сработать противовоспалительные и увлажняющие компоненты. На них я делаю акцент в шампуне «О…
Многие до сих пор удивляются, что наш SPF 22 так хорошо защищает от солнца.
Это не волшебство, а химия, если что. Просто дело в том, что для достижения SPF 50 часто используют химические фильтры, потому что на одних физических получить такую цифру технологически невозможно. Физические фильтры максимально фотостабильны и не разрушаются под действием ультрафиолета так как химические.
Поэтому его не нужно обновлять. Есл…
Некоторые сомневаются, что наш SPF 22,2 справляется с активным солнцем.
Так вот я наношу его утром, весь день не обновляю и не добавляю, смываю только вечером.
У меня через месяц приёма Вашего коллагена колени перестали болеть, не то чтобы у меня была какая-то тяжёлая стадия, но я их чувствовала при ходьбе, ощущения были неприятные, спасибо
🔥24❤12😁4
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @lenel_ya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Восстановление после родов и женское здоровье с Лидией Величко @ya_zdorova_poslerodov · 1,712#76
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Юлия Сайфуллина 💫Фея Красоты💫 @sayfullina_beauty_julia · 19,366 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 October 2026
Alexey Sibirsky @alexey_sibirsky · 24,982 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 September 2026
Надежда Асанова|Психология @asanna_news · 34,372 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
Владимир Животов - остеопат @zhivotovvladimir · 101,317 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 August 2026
Екатерина Шрейнер | SchreinerKate | Психолог @schreinerkate_life · 64,792 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 August 2026
Личный тренер в вашем телефоне @flex_mybody · 112,407 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lenel_ya” (@lenel_ya), 41,093 subscribers as measured 16 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lenel_ya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.